User talk:NicolasRTucker

Welcome!

Hello, NicolasRTucker, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:St.Regis Hotel Wan Chai Hong Kong, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Qcne (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:St.Regis Hotel Wan Chai Hong Kong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:St.Regis Hotel Wan Chai Hong Kong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article: Draft:St.Regis Hotel Wan Chai Hong Kong

Hi @@NicolasRTucker

Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for any type of self-promotion or advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia: not an advertising platform, directory, or a way to promote a subject. Currently your article Draft:St.Regis Hotel Wan Chai Hong Kong appears to be Wikipedia:Spam.

If you are connected in any way to St.Regis Hotel Wan Chai Hong Kong then you must declare your Wikipedia:Conflict of interest immediately.

It might be worth reading Wikipedia:Your first article which gives you the dos and don'ts of creating an article, and Wikipedia:Five pillars which detail the fundamental principles of Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here: Get help at the Teahouse

Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 09:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

uhh...I am not self promoting...information reliable source. If i were promoting my self would read MOST HANDSOME BLOKE WITH THE BIGGEST .....IMPECCABLE STYLE EVER SO COOL.... NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary information provided as you seem to be so aware 10mmsocket that it provides information in regards to financial stakes of outside partys rights. gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. maybe 10mmsocket you are not arriculate or at a comprehension level of understanding it does not provide information in reards to mandaroty paid editing disclosure but you 10mmsocket are at violations of paid advoacy as it refers to external stock and state retuns. NicolasRTucker (talk) 09:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NicolasRTucker. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:St.Regis_Hotel_Wan_Chai_Hong_Kong, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NicolasRTucker. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NicolasRTucker|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Qcne (talk) 09:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:NicolasRTucker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Do not make personal attacks as you did on QCNE 10mmsocket (talk) 10:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean like 10mmsocket and QCNE are making attacks.. NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NicolasRTucker

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:NicolasRTucker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qcne (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NicolasRTucker (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NicolasRTucker. Under the Wikipedia:Civility#Dealing with incivility policy I am asking that you strike through your uncivil comment about me, or re-word it calmly and neutrally. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @QCNE the only uncivil comment is your willingness to reply and contradict yourself.. Under the Wikipedia:Civility#Dealing with incivility policy I am asking that you strike through your uncivil comment about me, or re-word it calmly and neutrally. I am asking you to never write and publish post or waste anyones time.

Please do not engage further if you are not able to comprehend then write statements of not understanding and soliciting incivility. strike through before you comment and refer to your own user page.

Under the Wikipedia:Civility#Dealing with incivility policy I am asking that you strike through your uncivil comment about me, or re-word it calmly and neutrally. thanks! NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QCNE has no idea of user information and information act of rights which is not a personal website or blog QCNE is probably a vindictive mobster whom thinks wikipedia is his own website...

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NicolasRTucker (talk) 09:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NicolasRTucker. Under the Wikipedia:Civility#Dealing with incivility policy I am asking that you strike through your uncivil comment about me, or re-word it calmly and neutrally. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to WP:AIV. Very clearly WP:NOTHERE. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qcne targeting as a contributor seems to not understand the word defined as contributor or the user page information of contributor of credibility. QCNE needs to be a life..

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QCNE contradicts and the information provided exceeds the comprehension level of QCNE.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:St.Regis Wan Chai Hong Kong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:St.Regis Wan Chai Hong Kong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

do you and QCNE run targeted remarks of your own experiences out of anger and lessons learned?!? NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a good example of a hotel article, look at Royal Hibernian Hotel, which I created. Notice how it cites multiple respected journals and books, including The Encyclopaedia of Dublin and Dictionary of Irish Biography. You should start off with source material similar to that before attempting to create an encyclopedia article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rithcie333 thanks for the tips and suggestions its not really a hotel article its supporting information in regards to existing hotels with backed up credible sources I did include the US court and Washington. NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not really a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

are you aware of wikipedia having to fit the government systems of courts in regards to being a website in public domains.. NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you want a credible source of (Redacted) you reckon your hotel article is a good example?!? NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333can you rev-del the above comment? Serious BLP infringements. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I came here being nice, but you're clearly not interested in writing an encyclopedia, so here is an indefinite block. Have a nice day. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He's being disruptive on Wikimedia Commons too, so perhaps the admins there will also sort him out. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack page or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... (your reason here) --NicolasRTucker (talk) 10:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion actually my entry fits but the contesting are all breaching the:

This talk page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page that serves no purpose but to disparage or threaten its subject or some other entity. This includes libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person, or an article about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the history to revert to. See CSD G10.