User talk:Nicola Caione

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARGET instant payment settlement (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blatant advertising. Tag for Speedy Deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARGET instant payment settlement (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 23:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nicola Caione! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Discuss 23:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARGET instant payment settlement (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional language has gone unaddressed since last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARGET instant payment settlement (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kpgjhpjm was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kpg jhp jm 04:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARGET instant payment settlement (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

blatant advertising totally inappropriate for an encyclopaedia

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Nicola Caione, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kpg jhp jm 15:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpgjhpjm: Dear Kpgjhpjm, I didn't got to witch page are you referring to.... Nicola Caione (talk) 15:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicola Caione: Actually I was referring to your draft , but it looks better now , at least a bit . Kpg jhp jm 15:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpgjhpjm: Dear Kpgjhpjm, I've done a full review, anyway I'll be happy to improve it again if required (in the meantime I'll read the link you posed). Let's see what will happen in the review processNicola Caione (talk) 15:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alipay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zelle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARGET instant payment settlement (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Legacypac were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TARGET instant payment settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 08:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicola Caione (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear K.e.coffman, Legacypac and Athaenara I’m writing you about the Target Instant Payment page and the related blockage of my account. I’m contributing to Wikipedia to improve pages related to payment systems with a focus on instant payment. I’ve edited several pages (e.g. ApplePay, Zelle, Alipay, SamsungPay etc) and created the Instant Payment and TIPS page. The Issue with the latter is probably related to a misunderstanding due to the fact that I’m not native English speaker and I do not perceive the promotional language. The TIPS system is the analogue of Target 2 (which is used for the settlement of interbank payments), but is used for instant retail payments. It is a platform created by Eurosystem without commercial aims, but of systemic integration between the actors of the payment market. I apology if the draft page appeared to be an advertisement it was not my intention, I kindly ask you to undelete the page and allow me to further integrate with your comments --Nicola Caione (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to be glossing over the fact that you have a clear conflict of interest with regards to the TIPS project, since you and your employer are directly involved in its implementation. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicola Caione (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Yunshui, I've declared the potential confict of interests because I work for Banca d'Italia, which is the Central Bank that is developing the project. Please consider that I dont have any commercial relation with the product itself. What would be if an expert of Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan of whatever National Central Banks, review (or edit) e wiki page on a topic related to central bank's business? According to wikipedia policy all this contributions have to be rejected? All the information I've inserted comes from public trusted sources. Of course often the come from the ECB, but because it it the primary source of information. Other sources like web pages and newspaper simply cite the ECB's press release...... I hope this information would help to clarify this issue. Regards --Nicola Caione (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Representatives of any organization should not directly edit about their organization or what it does. Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about article subjects, not in the personal knowledge of experts(directly). Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID, as well as how to make edit requests in the area of your COI. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicola Caione (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Athaenara, I’m writing you about the Target Instant Payment page and the related blockage of my account occourred in 2018. I wrote several articles in the Italian version of Wikipedia (including TIPS https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Target_instant_payment_settlement) and now I would come back to the .en version, but unfortunately my account was blocked due to a misunderstanding on the TIPS page. At the beginning of my work in 2018 I declared the potential confict of interests because I'm working for Banca d'Italia, which is the Central Bank that has developed the project. Please consider that I dont have any commercial relation with the product itself. Anyway I will not edit this page anymore and I leave this task to the Wikipedia community. I hope this declaration will let you to remove the block. Nicola Caione (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The misunderstanding was that you thought it was appropriate to write about subject areas for which you have a conflict of interest. It wasn't appropriate. We've told you this over and over again. WP:IDHT seems to apply here. As you've not convinced me you understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO and you haven't indicated what you'd write about instead, there are no grounds to lift the block. Yamla (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicola Caione (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Yamla, I'm sorry about bothering you, but please consider that I do not intend to edit this page anymore and that at work at certain times I'm a trainer for Italian students in Wikipedia related projects. As an example please visit: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:Coordinamento/Scuole/Banca_d%27Italia_e_Liceo_Cavour This was a project aimed at improving the following page: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criptovaluta . When I've created the TIPS page I've added my conflict of interest disclaimer for trasparency and in good faith. Nicola Caione (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed your unblock request, as I believe you meant to request an unblock. Note that we mostly need to see what you plan to write about instead and you haven't provided that yet. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]