User talk:Nickjohndoe

April 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, M. A. Yusuff Ali, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|Let's discuss about the plans 06:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rdp060707: I apologise for my ignorance. I have edited the page of M.A. Yusuff Ali with the citation included. Nickjohndoe (talk) 13:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for signing my guestbook!

TheLastClassicist1750 (talk) 07:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @TheLastClassicist1750 for your kindness.Nickjohndoe (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Death Race 2000

Hello!

Usually, pages about movies/franchises have the comics' section simply named Comics, not Comic books nor Comic book series, etc.

So, please, revert your own revert regarding Death Race 2000. Thanks!

Hello User, I checked out other movies/franchise and they had their comics' section named 'Comic books'. For example take The Marvel Cinematic. By the way thanks for speaking up. You can always contact me if I am wrong.Nickjohndoe (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to be tidy - Talk:Post-vaccination embolic and thrombotic events

Hi Nickjohndoe, Could you check out my archiving, please? And here. If all is okay, do you mind putting it back the way it was?

I know people are understandably suspicious of IP users, but it's an article and Talk page to which I have been - helpfully, I hope - contributing, and it was was getting a bit long. It breaks my heart to just have things removed without them being looked into first. For various reasons I cannot register an account, and this is one of my few outlets. I thought I gave a pretty comprehensive outline of my changes in my edit summary, so your edit summary, "Reverting unexplained content removal" really stung. Thanks 49.177.64.138 (talk) 09:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undid reversion - needed to ensure correct Archiving

???Nickjohndoe can anyone hear me? Am I just a piece of crap to me wiped away from ppl who are in position to be allowed to register? The little, very little I can contribute thrown it it away, who cares I;m fooling myself - I am not even useful on WP... Hello, hello? I know this is dumb of me, but this is making me fall apart. When I see so many here just bully others, so much vandalism that isn't reverted, and the only little things I can pathetically do just flicked off like an annoying insect. that will teach me to believe I could be of some use, somewhere.49.177.64.138 (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Clarifying msg to Nickjohndoe updated 49.177.64.138 (talk) 10:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nickjohndoe, I am sorry I was so upset before. I know you are trying to protect WP from vandalism - so am I - but, please, if I could ask you to please, please, please do a little background check of what the edit is before you automatically revert. If you had taken one or two minutes only, I think you might have seen it was a genuine edit to Archive a very long Talk page. I have done it before on the same page. I enjoy editing, and I have very few avenues where I can contribute and which I find stimulating or interesting. WP is just about all I have, because of my circumstances. Pathetic, but true! So I felt for a moment like it was the end of the world. Best wishes to you. 49.177.64.138 (talk) 11:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if I have hurt anybody! I was just trying to do my bit. I will definitely look into the matter and reach out to you at the earliest. Sorry for all the inconvenience I might have caused. Nickjohndoe (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am really really sorry for reverting the changes that you made in good faith. I extremely regret not fully understanding the edit summary that you left. I thought I knew a lot about reverting vandalism(which is my main goal - due to some personal incidents) but now I realise that I know but a little. I am new and inexperienced here and I fully acknowledge that I have a lot more to learn before I can be the editor I always wished to be. Sorry for hurting you. You are doing a great job and I appreciate you for that. Please don't judge me on this single matter. In the conquest of getting much edit counts I have made a grave mistake today for which I totally blame myself. I hope we can forget this and move on. I could not respond immediately sorry for that or else I would have surely reverted it back to your version as soon as possible. Best wishes to you too(please reply so I know that you have read it). I will leave this message in your talk page too. Nickjohndoe (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. I understand, it must have looked like a lot that was taken away from the page. Please do not feel bad: I overreacted, I was upset and hasty. When I thought more calmly, I could see how it happened, and I can see you are a very well-intentioned editor. And you speak very kindly to everyone, too, I have noted. And you are doing good work, I can see from your edits! I will judge you only on all of that good work. I am still learning too! Thank you for your reply, and for being so concerned. Many thanks and best wishes 49.177.64.138 (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Forgot to ping Nickjohndoe! 49.177.64.138 (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for tracking down that Anna Kavan anomaly. Ϣere SpielChequers 23:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar. @WereSpielChequers Nickjohndoe (talk) 06:59, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Indian Air Force

Can you please review the article on Royal Indian Air Force for any errors. Cookersweet (talk) 15:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]