User talk:NickRich21

Please include retired Lt.C. Richard Martin Doezema Navy Cross 1951 in Korea. Proud of my Uncle, and I am a Vietnam Veteran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:404:CE00:1CA0:D0F:707A:29A7:1C84 (talk) 00:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your uncle is included on the list. Thank you for your service. Semper Fi --NickRich21 (talk) 20:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick, I met BG John W. Antonelli many times, I was good friends with his grandson. Thank you for creating a Wikipedia page for him. Men like him need to be remembered and honored. Thanks again 52ndengineerBco (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, NickRich21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @nickRich21. noticed you have updated the @nd Battalion 9th Marines page. Major General Dennis J Murphy was XO of 2/9 on the walk up to Con Thien July 29 1967. He was a Major at the time and some have come forward suggesting he should receive the CMH for his actions that night <he wants nothing to do with it>. He was in country less than 5 days and assembled the counter attack. Bing West wrote a piece for Rand Corporation detailing the story of that night and remembers him well. I noticed the notable members does not include him. He later commanded 2/9 in Okinawa and led the first Desert 1 deployment to Okinawa in 1973. 2/9 is his home. I'm requesting that someone exdit the page <I am incapable and being his son, don't want to grandstand; but a lot of 2/9 Marines will recognize and appreciate the noting of his membership there. He retired in 1987 as Commanding General 2nd Marine Division and held that command longer than any other previous CG save LTG Ormond R Simpson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.61.23.254 (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Medal of Honor instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NickRich21/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:NickRich21/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NickRich21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archie Donahue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas Baker (aviator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinguished Flying Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

		Military Barnstar
		Thanks for your work on USMC command biographies. Always glad to know the corps is on the job. Consider visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. You might find some like-minded editors who can help with resources and assessment. BusterD (talk) 03:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas C. Turner

The article Thomas C. Turner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:SOLDIER and GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Edwin H. Brainard

Hello, NickRich21,

Thank you for creating Edwin H. Brainard.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work on this article!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Samf4u}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Samf4u (talk) 18:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of people named William (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to William Smith, William Woods, William Brown, William Lee, William Wright, William Bell, William White, William Wood, William Shaw and William Long

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please observe WP:INTDABLINKS in the future. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NickRich21

Thank you for creating Nicholas Megura.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Portal:World War II into List of Navy Cross recipients for World War II. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack E. Conger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack E. Conger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack E. Conger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Firstclass306 (talk) 16:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Military History

Hello NickRich21! Thank you for your contributions to military history-related articles.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors who are also working on military history topics, please take a look at the WikiProject Military history—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please add your username here, and a project coordinator will soon be along to welcome you. If you're not sure about joining, why not sign up to receive our monthly newsletter, The Bugle? It is a great way to get a feel for the project. Regards, Kges1901 (talk) 12:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For your much-appreciated efforts related to naval aviation, specifically for improving coverage of USMC WWII pilots. Kges1901 (talk) 12:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Fagan (officer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Fagan (officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Fagan (officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in Infoboxes

Please note WP:INFOBOXFLAG and stop adding back US flags into Infoboxes as you did here: [[1]] as such flags are merely decorative and do not "convey information in addition to the text". Mztourist (talk) 08:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan C. Haerter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan C. Haerter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan C. Haerter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 10:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan T. Yale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan T. Yale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan T. Yale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 09:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John W. Frederick Jr.

The article John W. Frederick Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. [[User:Mztourist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mztourist (talk) 03:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John W. Frederick Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John W. Frederick Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John W. Frederick Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel C. Pollock

The article Daniel C. Pollock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. [[User:Mztourist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mztourist (talk) 09:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bennie M. Bunn

The article Bennie M. Bunn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 14:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John A. Butler

The article John A. Butler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 14:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel C. Pollock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel C. Pollock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel C. Pollock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert R. Klingman

The article Robert R. Klingman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. One Navy Cross and retired a Lt Col doesn't make him notable, nor does downing a plane by ramming

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mztourist (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bobby D. Lain

The article Bobby D. Lain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. One award of the Navy Cross and retired a Major doesn't make him notable. [[User:Mztourist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Robert R. Klingman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert R. Klingman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert R. Klingman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NominationName for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NominationName is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NominationName until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 03:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bobby D. Lain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bobby D. Lain, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby D. Lain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:NickRich21/sandbox

Hello, NickRich21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]