User talk:NickCatal

Note- Posts to this page have a very low chance of being seen or replied to

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Loyola University Chicago Expansion Plan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Loyola University Chicago Expansion Plan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hugh (talk) 05:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anne Grauer

The article Anne Grauer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't this article passes WP:PROF. Hence, proposing deletion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 15:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Catalano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Catalano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Catalano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. edg ☺ ☭ 19:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Catalano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Catalano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Catalano (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  crh ₂₃  (Talk) 18:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (IRC) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating IRC, NickCatal!

Wikipedia editor ThePromenader just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

the redirect here was replaced with an article, but I set it back to its former redirect status (leaving a note about it to the article author)

To reply, leave a comment on ThePromenader's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

THEPROMENADER ✎ ✓ 15:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

"Brian Cox (physicist" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Brian Cox (physicist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Brian Cox (physicist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)