User talk:Nhradek

Welcome!

Hello, Nhradek!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, -- dsprc ^[talk] 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precognition

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.

I've noticed your recent contributions and I'd like to offer some perspective. While Wikipedia has a multitude of experienced editors, it doesn't necessarily mean they are infallible. That said, the likelihood of them collectively acting in bad faith to hinder the dissemination of knowledge is quite minimal.

I understand your perspective on the Precognition topic, especially regarding the citation of Bem's papers. However, there are several editorial policies on Wikipedia that guide such decisions. The intricacies of these policies and their influence on content can be complex, especially for those who are new to the platform.

As a newcomer, you might find it challenging to navigate these policies without a deeper understanding of how Wikipedia operates. Therefore, I'd suggest starting with editing some uncontroversial articles. This will give you a hands-on experience of Wikipedia's workings and its community dynamics. Once you're more familiar with the platform and its guidelines, you'll be in a better position to engage in more contentious topics.

Lastly, I'd like to introduce you to a principle that might be of interest: WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. It's a reminder that while Wikipedia is a platform for knowledge, it's not always the place to right every perceived wrong. Sometimes, understanding and working within the system can lead to more productive outcomes. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The likelihood that Bem, Tressoldi and others are acting in bad faith is incorrect too. Multiple editors have acted in bad faith. I can quote if you wish. Nhradek (talk) 19:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What editorial decisions? You can't cite them. Nhradek (talk) 19:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Nhradek. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]