User talk:Newsameword

thanks

Welcome

Hello Newsameword, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Newsameword, good luck, and have fun. – Ad Orientem (talk) 12:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newsameword, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Newsameword!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

I don't know why you asked me for the reasons I reverted you, as I've told you above. You've added the tag again without starting a discussion - I'll give you a little while to do that and if you don't I'll remove it.

As Dougweller very clearly explained in his comments, that I observe you deleted, you may not add quotes or any material to an article that is not backed by reliable sources. I am reverting the aticle back to it's last good form. Please do not revert this edit or add any material without citing relaible sources to back it up. Your recent editing of Young Muslim Organisation is starting to look disruptive. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Your recent editing history at Young Muslim Organisation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 16:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Young Muslim Organisation. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, revert again and you will almost certainly be blocked. And what does " members are encouraged read them works" mean? Dougweller (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone wrote "his" and then i added "them", ok you can delete other things but i added blue linked names, so please do not delete those things [[ ]] Dougweller Ad Orientem. Newsameword (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC) Now is it OK? First of all I added blue linked names, then I have written about Hassan al-Banna with reference, Dougweller Ad Orientem.[reply]