User talk:NewWikiProjects

Welcome!

Hello, NewWikiProjects, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wikipedia:Finding Eigenvectors: Fast and Nontraditional Method, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anita5192 (talk) 02:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Finding Eigenvectors: Fast and Nontraditional Method

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Finding Eigenvectors: Fast and Nontraditional Method requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anita5192 (talk) 02:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uditanalin. Thank you. Anita5192 (talk) 02:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Uditanalin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 03:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== I said in a comment I want to keep this in a talk page or as a sandbox project and didn't know how to do it. I asked your help to move it there. Instead someone deleted the page and blocked me. NewWikiProjects (talk) 07:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NewWikiProjects (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Enough is enough. Some of those admins did not read my comments and blocked me. It is very clear that my intention was to put the page in either as a sandbox or talk page. It is not clear why it was deleted without properly reviewing it. Please unblock my account.

Decline reason:

Requests and comments that contain personal attacks are not considered. Further attacks will result in you losing access to this page. Your request should focus on your behavior, as that is why you were blocked. 331dot (talk) 10:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NewWikiProjects (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to keep the page as a personal sandbox project or talk page and asked your help to move it since when I press the 'publish' tab it automatically created the page, but not as a sandbox page. Without reviewing my comment, someone blocked my account and deleted the page. Please review my first comment and then unblock me.

Decline reason:

This is irrelevant. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NewWikiProjects (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I clearly explained what I was trying to do and my intention. I wanted to keep the page under sandbox. That's my explanation. NewWikiProjects (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. The only place you may gain unblock is on the talk page of your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.