User talk:NewTestLeper79/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:NewTestLeper79. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!
Hello, NewTestLeper79/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Thanks for catching my categorising mistake in Mike Sheron. Guess which article I was using as a template. Oldelpaso 17:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
An e-mail from Doctor Jimmy
Ahh baba. It works every time ha ha .Nothing though i said is untrue and that i can guaruntee.
And some more...
Just who do you think you are.Do you really think I have a problem with Tony
Ellis signing for Blackpool,it was 12 years ago for god sake.He was and still is to me and many other North End fans a hero and a legend and in my time the best striker Ive seen at the club.I'll grant you one thing,i did at the time have a problem with John Beck for wanting him out in the first place ,and succeeding and also with the board for not being big enough to stand up to Beck in regards to keeping our best player. If though Tony Ellis is such a hero on the Fylde why has it taken until now for someone,and a Preston North End fan at that,to write an article on him.Had he not played for Preston before going to Blackpool he would be classed in the same league as John Murphy, Scott Taylor and the like but due to the fact that he played for Preston he is now seen as some sort of iconic messiah in Blackpool.It seems to me that it is you who have a problem with the fact that Ellis once, nay twice played for Preston and not i should say the other way round.Having said that coming from someone who listens to REM and seems to also follow St Johnstone it really shouldn't come as any surprise. Many Preston North End fans do hold a grudge against Ellis for walking out on us but many more also blame John Beck for forcing him out.To try and replace Ellis with the likes of Mark Sale and Neil Trebble was plain criminal and it was no surprise when he was sacked just 4 months after letting Ellis go.His successor Gary Peters admitted that Beck made a mistake in letting him go solely for the reason that he was bigger than Beck at Deepdale and also more influential in the dressing room.Peters added that although Ellis could be hard work(something Owen Oyston also admitted to me)he could have lived with that due to the fact that he could guarantee you 25-30 goals a season. Believe me if I really did have a problem with Ellis going to Blackpool i would not have started the article as i did or i would have made some rather
derogatory comments about him,which i didnt.
...
Dick
...
Also does my user page say i started [the Lancaster City F.C. article].Look carefully at it and it states that is is part
of "My Contributions".If I had added something to it quite meaningless or just corrected something i would have put it in "Articles I Have Added To".The fact that I put a hell of a lot down is the reason i categorised it as i did.like its your buisness.You must lead a very sad and lonely life to go on as you do.Have
you ever kissed a girl you prat.
Please don't move pages by copying and pasting their content; it doesn't preserve the page's history. --Chris (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've performed the move you were trying to do. The page is back at The 'Burbs. --Chris (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Noted on both counts. Thanks. ~ Dudesleeper 13:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Kyle Clancy/"Category:Year of birth"/"Category:Date of birth"
Greetings, Dudesleeper----same as you, I'm working on a big project and, as they have it in that stub-sorting line, you can help just by continuing to do what you've been doing. My giant project, as I've written in my previous message to an administrator, is to properly organize the thousands of mis-alphabetized names in all of the "Category" listings. As you know if, at the bottom of "John Doe"'s stub or full bio, a "Category", such as "Category:Living people|Doe, John" is input as "Category:Living people" or "Category:Living people|John Doe", then "John Doe" will be alphabetized under "J", instead of "D". You've been doing it properly, but scores of other editors haven't been.
There is also another "Category" problem. We met at the Kyle Clancy edit, over the Category:Date of birth missing/Category:Year of birth missing uncertainty. Ideally for the sake of clarity, but awkwardly sounding, the Category:Date of birth missing should have been called Category:Year of birth present, but month and day missing and the Category:Year of birth missing should have been called Category:Day, month and year of birth missing.
There are nearly a thousand biographies which begin with either, for example, "John Doe (born 1950)" or "John Doe (1950—August 26, 2006)". Since the year of birth is not missing, these can only go into the Category:Date of birth missing. On the other hand, there are about ten times as many bios, especially stubs of present-day individuals, like Kyle Clancy, which then can only go into the Category:Year of birth missing.
Many editors hedge their bets by putting the no-date subjects of their biographies into both the "Date" and the "Year" Categories, reasoning that the "Date missing" Category must mean only the day and the month (August 26), and the "Year missing" Category must mean only the year (2006). At first, it seems to make sense, until we realize that the two Categories are mutually exclusive. If "John Doe" was only in Category:Year of birth missing, but not in Category:Date of birth missing, that would mean that his biography would have to begin with "John Doe (born August 26)", which, while popular when movie magazines write about actors, is never done in Wikipedia.
Also, if we were to use that method, there wouldn't even be any point in keeping both of the Categories — I recently offered a proposal to delete the Category:Year of birth missing and merge its contents into the more-readily-understood Category:Date of birth missing, but withdrew the idea almost immediately, realizing that to search out missing dates, we need every detail sorted in a separate "Category".
For example, yesterday I sorted a short entry on "Samuel Cromwell (died December 1, 1842)", who was hanged on a US Navy ship in mid-ocean on suspicion that he might be planning a mutiny. His bio was under Category:Date of birth missing, instead of the more correct Category|Year of birth missing. We know the exact date of his death, but his birth will probably always remain unknown. So I transferred him to a third, even-more-correct, Category:Date of birth unknown|Cromwell, Samuel, for long-ago individuals whose birthdate will probably never be known.
I hope all of the above provided some room for discussion on the Kyle Clancy "Year/Date" uncertainty and that you would let me know your thoughts on the subject and how you want to handle this "Category" in your future biographies and stubs. Romanspinner talk 07:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Linking to Defender
When you want to link to the article about the football position defender, please do not link to Defender, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the Defender (football) article, by writing out [[Defender (football)|defender]]. Regards, -- Jeff3000 20:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
Well done for your good work on football articles. Do with it what you will, but keep up your good work. --Guinnog 22:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
No full stop is required, the link and article title need not be identical. For your reference, Template:North_West_Counties_1, Template:Scottish First Division, Template:G14 and many others, all omit full stops despite them being included in the article or article title. Kanaye 16:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
After he graduated he "worked in a bakery back in Portland with a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and legal theory."
I grasped the irony in the sentence perfectly. My problem with the statement is not that it's ironic, but that it's badly contructed and doesn't cite a source for the quote. Care to correct? --S0uj1r0 04:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Corrected accordingly.
What? What is the source that you provided? Even if you explained the difference between official and unofficial (and I'm not sure where that was explained either), it's a totally arbtirary distinction that you made up; it's meaningless. Why is one official and another not? Who cares? What if I think other albums aren't official? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 17:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- The source would be the R.E.M. website. If they don't list the three compilations in question, why should we (which we still are, for now)? If you can't take the word from "the horse's mouth" as official, what's the point in trying to reason with you any more? And the official/unofficial difference is explained on the relevant compilation pages (unless you've reverted those too). - Dudesleeper 17:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
R.E.M. discography, personal attacks, etc.
Posted at Talk:R.E.M. discography and User talk:Dudesleeper It's not cute or clever to pick fights with people and then ignore what they have to say when you call them on it (per 3RR complaints below.) A "poll" that lasts for a couple of days with three votes (not including the person who clearly had the dispute in the first place) is neither a legitimate poll, nor is it one with a "huge turnout." [Sarcasm missed - Ed.] Again, I have to ask if this is some kind of a joke.
I'll direct you to Wikipedia:No personal attacks, too, since you've either never seen this before, or think it doesn't apply to you. The article talk namespace is intended for discussion about the template itself, not your personal opinions about or psychoanalysis of me. If you want to complain about me, that's why Wikipedia has the user talk namespace.
Let me "dumb this down" to "your level:" R.E.M. don't release albums. They are signed to record labels that release albums (e.g. IRS Records.) R.E.M. record music that is put on albums and then the record labels release them, with the band and the label making some money. This process is true in the case of all the compilations listed in the article; they're all official, because the band authorized the record label to release this material when they signed their names to a contract IRS Records (and consequently EMI) are appointed or authorized to act in a designated capacity. Does this make sense to you, because I'm still not seeing how this arbitrary division of "official" and "unofficial" is helpful to the reader, an actual division that exists somewhere other than your imagination, or meaningful toward editing this article. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 14:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
scot footy
Hi nice articles and categories but remember not to leave a gap between
Category: and Scotti it needs to be Category:Scottish without space otherwiese your categories don't register. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
- Your categories at the bottom of the page are perfect its just I had to correct the spaces
- Yours was like this Category: Scottish footballers|
- Corrected should be Category:Scottish footballers
no space between any of it is correct
- Its just even though you categorised it correctly it didn't show up at the bottom of the page when you showed it so it looked like it wasn't categrized. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Look at the last page you contributed. If you scroll down now you can see the categories you put them in at the bottom e.g Scottish footballers St Johnstone players etc.
- Before it wasn't there even though you added them in the editing because you left a space between :
- Replied here.
- No I looked at it when you had added them. You didn't notice that when you added them it didn't work because you left a gap between the word category: and the writing Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Everythings fine now.
- Replied here.
- Hi. No I think what happened is that when I initially looked at the page there was no categories as you confirmed so I went into edit to category it. However probably just at that moment I went to edit you saved your categories that you added so when I looked at it, it led me to think that it wasn't registering because you left a gap. No i checked a space doesn't matter it was just bad timing!!!! Sorry to complicate things!! All the best Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
- Hi. No I think what happened is that when I initially looked at the page there was no categories as you confirmed so I went into edit to category it. However probably just at that moment I went to edit you saved your categories that you added so when I looked at it, it led me to think that it wasn't registering because you left a gap. No i checked a space doesn't matter it was just bad timing!!!! Sorry to complicate things!! All the best Ernst Stavro Blofeld 16:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Ellis
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Ellis (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Commented here.
Koavf, etc....
"Dude, he's met R.E.M., therefore he knows it all."
- Oh my... well in that case, who are we to argue with a certified authority on the band? Have they hired him on yet to write their official biography? lol. Cheers mate... BGC 02:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
3RR for Koavf....
He just broke it...so I reported him. [1] BGC 14:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
There isn't actually an error here, even though it looks like there is. The template works fine when included into articles, it's just that it can't do date math without knowing which dates to compare. (Templates often act weirdly on their own page when they take parameters.) What's important is that the template works if it's included into an article (check anything on its What links here, or its talk page). --ais523 13:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Understood. Thanks for the clarification. - Dudesleeper 19:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
ben folds
sorry it took a while to respond, to you. been busy. i didn't, actually. i kind of fell off the ben folds wagon after rockin' the suburbs, i loved ben folds five though. the ep's were pretty good, but it seemed kind of like a hand-out/cop-out for the ben folds five fans after he realized that the hyper-produced rockin' the suburbs formula didn't work out so well. i heard on the radio that he re-recorded and re-wrote a clean version of the song "rockin' the suburbs" for some kid's movie that's coming out. --Friendship hurricane 19:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
The return of KOAVF
He had reverted the REM template once more. I changed it back but I am not going into another 3RR war. Should we contact an admin to deal with him? What do you reckon? BGC 02:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- He's actually gone and broken the 3RR... AGAIN! I've just reported this to the same admin that blocked him. Btw, the template currently lists Koavf's version. BGC 13:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Koavf,one of Wikipedia's most notorious edit-warriors has been blocked indefinitely for keeping on reverting everything that he doe not like, regardless of continousely being blocked.--A Jalil 22:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
And all the better for the photo! Anything on the Fergusson Gallery? BTW on the St Johnstone pages which you've been building, there is a page on Allan Moore though more from his present role at the Binos. AllyD 07:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
Middle Names
Hi Dudesleeper
You may have noticed that all the players affected are of a certain vintage - its an old Scottish Football League Review from 1997-98. I think I’ve got a 1991-92 one kicking about as well somewhere. I'm assuming that as the all the info is correct as the league itself published the books. I don't suppose they make them anymore - like Scotland qualifying for major tournaments, sadly a thing of the past. Caledonian Place 23:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
football categories
On CFDU, there was a no-consensus discussion about the names of some football categories you created. I argued for changing them to the standard format in the ubercategory category:Wikipedian football (soccer) team fans:
- category:Wikipedians who support Blackpool F.C. to category:Wikipedian Blackpool F.C. fans
- category:Wikipedians who support SC Freiburg to category:Wikipedian SC Freiburg fans
- category:Wikipedians who support St Johnstone F.C. to category:Wikipedian St. Johnstone F.C. fans
- category:Wikipedians who support RC Strasbourg to category:Wikipedian RC Strasbourg fans
The nomination failed because some people thought the categories should be deleted entirely. Before I relist them, I wonder if you have an opinion, as they're categories you created. Thoughts?--Mike Selinker 22:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
- Well, some people voted rename and some voted delete. If they were named appropriately, I expect the first group would be more inclined to vote keep, since they already did so for all other sports team categories. But it's up to you.--Mike Selinker 03:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
- I'm not sure you need to vote. As you're the only member of them currently, you can put yourself into the categories with whatever names you think is best, and then we'll sort it out from there.--Mike Selinker 15:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
- Well, some people voted rename and some voted delete. If they were named appropriately, I expect the first group would be more inclined to vote keep, since they already did so for all other sports team categories. But it's up to you.--Mike Selinker 03:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
And it continues....
Our favorite belligerent Wikipedian has returned... and learned absolutely nothing (what a shocker). Naturally, I reverted the template back.... Just giving you a heads up.....
BGC 02:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm from Montreal, Canada. We generally don't use "mate" in our language over in North America, but I've travelled throughout the UK (was just in Scotland in August), Australia and knew heaps of "mate"-sayers when I lived in Japan as well, so sometimes my Brit-slang seeps out... BGC 22:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- What part of America do you reside in? BGC 02:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm from Montreal, Canada. We generally don't use "mate" in our language over in North America, but I've travelled throughout the UK (was just in Scotland in August), Australia and knew heaps of "mate"-sayers when I lived in Japan as well, so sometimes my Brit-slang seeps out... BGC 22:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems he's reverting it once a day now (took him a while to figure out the 3RR rules it seems....). I just switched it back. I guess this'll become part of my daily routine! lol BGC 10:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
RfM
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Template:R.E.M., and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
Template:St Johnstone F.C. squad
Would you consider a format like Template:Angers SCO Squad for a numberless squad? I might have changed it myself but I know you don't like people touching it. sʟυмɢυм • т • c 21:05, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
dots vs dashes....
I like the dots. Good idea. Reckon adding it to REM?
PS - Koavf's on the prowl again. I'd do it, but I'd be starting to approach the 3RR again.
BGC 14:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Jennifer Aniston
Your recent edits to Jennifer Aniston were reverted because you added a copyrighted image to the article without providing the mandatory information (in this case, a detailed fair-use rationale justifying the use of the copyrighted image in that article, as specifically required by the image's license). --Yamla 17:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
James Quinn
I'm not sure; his real name is definitely Stephen, but I've tried looking into it in the past and haven't been able to find out if James is actually his middle name. --The Wilky Bar Kid 14:03, 9 October 2006 (BST)
Re: Catagories
Which specific article(s) are you refering to? I assume you are refering to my disambig of "Forward" or "Winger" where I used AutoWikiBrowser. That tool has a setting for "general fixes" which does stuff like move catagory and stub links to a more consistant position, plus remove underscores and extra spaces in links. I never save the page (at least try not to) when those fixes are the only changes made to the page, but I usually let it go ahead with the minor fixes when there is a main change on the page. --- Jagged 12:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
German standings
That's different. Do you consider the first season in Bundesliga history news right now? Kingjeff 17:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
That still goes back to the point I made. The transfers of SC Freiburg will only be updated during each transfer period. Kingjeff 20:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Facts and legends.
Re your deletion of the Yard squirrel-roasting addition to the Harvard Yard page: It is a fact that fireplaces in Yard dorms are bricked over. It is a fact that new students wondered why. It is a fact that the legend exists re the reason. Besides, the addition was in the "Trivia" section.
-- Bruce Jerrick (Matthews 18, 1967)
- It's requested that facts be backed up with credible sources. I'm happy to have the legend reinstated if references are provided. - Dudesleeper 11:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Football templates
Hey Dude, me again. I changed some of your edits to templates:
- Managers should not be on a separate line; templates should be as compact as poss. Such a thing has been considered but quashed in the past. If a concensus for a br is established, it would be easier to insert one within the manager template.
- Not sure about use of the colon after "Manager". In theory the numbers should then have colons after them, perhaps, but I've no real objection. Anyway, I moved it so it appears even when the "title" option is exercised.
sʟυмɢυм • т • c 20:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Replied here.
- Yeah, I didn't like the manager appearing on them, but I've got used to it over time. sʟυмɢυм • т • c 20:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Scarlett Johansson images
You said: "How about finding a legal image yourself instead of just deleting copyrighted ones? Getting a bit tired of the back and forths here."
- Sorry, I don't have any free images of Johansson. This doesn't mean we are permitted to violate WP:FUC, however. --Yamla 14:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Question on my talk
I responded there -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 19:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Steve Thompson
Birthdate from 'the Breedon Book of Football Managers' by Dennis Turner and Alex White. WikiGull 20:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Place of birth and full name added - will try and expand the stub at some point as well. WikiGull 20:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: Good Will Hunting
Dunno how to message you particularly, but...as far as the Mass Pike Good Will Hunting reference...there are several clues which show the scene to be on I-90 west in Massachusetts. If you pause as the car passes under a bridge, you can easily see that the sign on the bridge is for Pittsfield Road in West Stockbridge (maybe I should change that; I am referencing a map right now). Plus, the Mass Pike only has three full-highway tolls, and two are in urban areas of Eastern Mass (Weston and Allston) where the highway has three and four lanes each way. There is a sign in this scene which shows "toll plaza ahead" so it has to be out there. I have driven that section of I-90 many times, and in fact driven every section of the road which is tolled, and it matches perfectly with the scenes in the movie.
Sorry if this is misplaced...
Cheers. - Ofsevit
Elliot[t] Smith
Yes, I know. I posted this very early in the morning here in the states. I apologize... Rossinicholas 12:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Richard Thompson/Bonnie St. Johnstone
Nice to meet you Dudesleeper.
I'll have another listen, but he's explaining this song, written in the 1500's - 1600's, and notes it mentions Edinburgh, some other town I don't recall, and St. Johnstone of course. He then goes to explain how, in the intervening centuries, the town, once of significant enough import to get its own song, has now been mostly subsumed into Perth but the name lives on the football club. I can't vouch for his knowledge of Scottish history or geography and lord knows mine is non-existent so I apologize if I've got the citizens of St. Johnstone up in arms ("Part of Perth my ass!"), but yes, his point was the name lives on in the football club. I note when I search for it, it directs me to the football club, so he may be right. Perhaps you can add enough insight to support the removal of the word 'mostly' to clear things up.
Two-time/twice
"Two-time: v. be unfaithful to (a lover or spouse)" -- The Concise O.E.D., 10th edition, 1999. It's not a matter of idiom, it's a matter of definition. That said, I've rephrased to avoid this difficulty. (As an aside, three-time, etc. are not defined and so make sense). Cheers, Sliggy 15:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
U.K.
Why is it changing U.S. to US but ignoring, for example, U.K.? - Dudesleeper 03:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Dudesleeper. I think you might be a little confused. I'm actually changing "U.K." to "UK", and leaving "U.S." as is. The reason is mentioned in my talk page archives, it's simply that U.S. is the preferred abbreviation in America, and UK is the preferred abbreviation in the Commonwealth.This is documented in the Manual of Style. Hope this helps, CmdrObot 20:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was tired more than confused. To balance it up, I changed the U.S. to US after the bot had been through, not realising there was a rule against it. I'd change it back if it was of life-threatening importance, which, some will be surprised to read, it isn't. - Dudesleeper 03:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Relevant Talk Channels
Thanks for telling me that deinitly wasn't spelled right not that it makes much of a difference because I still don't know how to spell it. Anyway where would these "relevant talk channels" be located. I know the American college football project, probably wikiproject football, and the proposed wikiprojects list. Do you know any other places? I don't intend to start this until WikiProject Africa is underway, but it would help to know of other "relevant talk channels." XYZ CrVo 20:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- You misunderstood the question or, more likely, I worded a sentence wrong. I was asking if there was a WikiProject on American Soccer. Like the MLS and USL. XYZ CrVo
- I was wondering if their was a project invloving football, not American Football. XYZ CrVo 21:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Name?
You can't say American football project... You can't say American soccer project either because the rest of the English speaking world doesn't say "Soccer," they say "football"XYZ CrVo 21:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- How about WP Soccer in America
- thanks for your help... I've posted a message in main MLS article. Can you make sure I spelled the words. How do you spell definitly as an FYI type thing? XYZ CrVo 21:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ohh I thought you thought I was being arogant because of FYI type thing. Now I do feel arrogant and stupid.
Football (soccer) in North America?
Do you think this name sounds good. It might be too long, but there's that stupid football/soccer problem. Football in America could work also. What do you think? XYZ CrVo 22:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I never thought of that.XYZ CrVo 22:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Endorsment
Hi Dudesleeper, Francis Tyrs, a friend of Koavf, is making a count where you are counted as not endorsing the permanent block. If you are endorsing, please do correct him on the admins incidents board. Thanks--A Jalil 10:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Jennifer Aniston
Your recent edit to Jennifer Aniston (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Your Zinedine Zidane edit
Changing "a career" to "an eighteen-year career" probably shouldn't be considered a "minor edit", since it actually adds content to the article. Just my opinion. Canadiana 19:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
WP Football in America
Please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject/List of proposed projects if you want to be a part of WikiProject Football(soccer) in the USA and Canada. The page is still under construction. (I couldn't find a template.) XYZ CrVo 02:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I know that the scope is bigger, but many American Football leagues also have Canadian teams, so it seemed appropriate to include Canada.XYZ CrVo 21:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- What do you think of WP soccer in America being incorporated into a bigger project? Someone suggested it and I don't understand exactly what it would mean. XYZ CrVo 22:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The page for WP Soccer and America User:XYZ CrVo/WikiProject Football (soccer) in the USA and Canada is up and running, but still in its beginning stages. Please leave any comments on the talk page of the project. Look how long the name is :) all because of political correctness. XYZ CrVo 03:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks and I don't think I can include myself in the list of members yet. XYZ CrVo 19:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Often, the year of birth is already in the article (and often not at the top where you'd expect it). Other times, Category:Year of birth missing is already on the page somewhere. When I notice that neither of those are present, I do try to change the category. If I missed one, please just fix it. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cloak-&-Dagger.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cloak-&-Dagger.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)