User talk:NewJohn

Welcome!

Hello, NewJohn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dloh cierekim 15:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Samsara (2011 film) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Samsara (2011 film) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://vimeo.com/73234721) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contents of Meat Atlas

I reverted your addition of the detailed contents of Meat Atlas. Even if the material is available under CCbySA licensing, that doesn't make it appropriate content for an encyclopedia article. A general overview of the book, and an indication of any notable authors who may have contributed, is sufficient. Anything more starts to become promotional. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice! Do you think I can place the section I just posted in the talk-part of that articl instead? That might still be helpful for somebody (or myself) to write a few summarizing sentences later. NewJohn (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how such material, placed in the talk page, could assist you or other editors. You have access to the book, so you can always reference that if you choose to further summarize it. Any other editor who would choose to summarize the book would do well to obtain a copy rather than rely on the contents summary posted on the talk page. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

Hi John, thanks for creating Meat Atlas. Just to let you know, in case you don't already, that you can nominate that for a WP:DYK spot on Wikipedia's front page. You choose an interesting factoid from the book (did you know that ....?), maximum 200 characters (not counting the words "did you know that"), and it must be in the article and clearly sourced. Also, the new article must be linked in bold in the hook.

So for example, "did you know that, according to Meat Atlas, Brazilian meat company JBS's revenue in 2012 exceeded the gross domestic product of Barbados, Iceland, Mauritius and Zimbabwe combined?"

It's posted on the main page for a few hours, which gets the new article some extra hits. If you'd like to try it, there's a template that's pretty self-explanatory here. The only snag is that you must nominate it within five days of creation, i.e. by 18 January. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SlimVirgin! I'll make a proposal later.... Maybe: did you know that, according to Meat Atlas, the world’s biggest meat company JBS can accommodate a daily slaughter of 12 million birds, 85,000 head of cattle and 70,000 pigs? NewJohn (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the thing Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_January_13. Thanks again! NewJohn (talk) 12:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good! I'll keep an eye on it as it makes it way through. How long that takes varies a lot, by the way. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 16:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Meat Atlas

On 28 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Meat Atlas, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, according to Meat Atlas, the world's biggest meat company, JBS, can accommodate a daily slaughter of 12 million birds, 85,000 head of cattle and 70,000 pigs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meat Atlas. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:13, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Veterinary physician may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

vets really sold out to industrial agri-business?"], Lucy Siegle, The Guardian, 19 January 2014]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Farmageddon (book)

Hello! Your submission of Farmageddon (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ohc ^¡digame! 05:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Farmageddon (book)

On 20 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Farmageddon (book), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the author of Farmageddon travelled the world to investigate what happens when 300,000 laying hens are held or 10,000 cows are being milked on a single farm? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Farmageddon (book). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Panorama

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't vandalize

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my [[ |talk page]] or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Nice new article. Hafspajen (talk) 05:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Civility Warning

Hallo NewJohn. PLease refrain from using wording like 'manipulation of source see afd'. The sources have been handled, and properly so. If you have issues with details, go for the disk. I would prefer not to see the same bullying and hate speech that happened to the topic in the deWP. I would be happy to discuss things in a civil manner. Polentarion Talk 08:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's way beyond details. And why would one head a section here with "warning"? What happens if.... ? You are really not very goog in dealing with criticism. -- NewJohn (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's just about manners, and it's about the rules here. An AfD is not an article disc. Polentarion Talk

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NewJohn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]