User talk:NewGangnamStylesUnited

Unblock requests

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NewGangnamStylesUnited (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PSY'sGentlemanIs66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

According to WP:ISU, the new name does not violate the username policy.

Decline reason:

As noted, the concern is no longer your username. Kuru (talk) 14:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin: The latest entry in the block log clearly shows the username is now irrelevant. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cdctmom6712.
NewGangnamStylesUnited, you really need to post an unblock request from your original account, not a sockpuppet account. And your unblock request should address the reason for your block, which isn't your username. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NewGangnamStylesUnited (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PSYRocks679 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

According to my new username, it does not violate the username policy.

Decline reason:

This really should have been logged as a sockpuppet block, per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cdctmom6712. —DoRD (talk) 13:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, NewGangnamStylesUnited, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category talk:7th century in fiction, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 17:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category talk:7th century in fiction

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 17:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block

First, a question: What other accounts have you had on Wikipedia? I had the "WidgetsUSA" account. NewGangnamStylesUnited (talk) 11:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Second, notwithstanding your "no templates" message, you should really read this one, considering what you have written on your user page:[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]