User talk:NeviRom

November 2014

Welcome!

Hello, NeviRom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:34, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AVS Video Editor

A tag has been placed on AVS Video Editor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4:Recreation of an article deleted through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVS Video Editor (2nd nomination)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help in recovering AVS Video Editor page

Dear administrator
This page should not be speedily deleted because I am creating the page similar to the previously deleted page, adding reliable, secondary sources about the AVS Video Editor. This is absolutely different page
I have also contacted Missvain before writing the new article in the sandbox. Some additional sources will be added in the near future
I need smb's help in recovering the article
btw the new articles creation has also been requested (using "submit draft for review" option) without any result, thats why I created a new article AVS Video Editor
Thanks
NeviRom (talk) 13:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To have your article restored, go to WP:TEAHOUSE and ask for it to be restored to your sandbox, of to Wikipedia:Draft space. Then you can work on it and submit it for a review. Good luck, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should the article be submitted for a review in the WP:AFC or using the code {{subst:submit}}? Thanks a lot!NeviRom (talk) 08:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I understand your question, you are asking about two different things. I'd suggest you follow the instructions at AFC, and if in doubt, ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. They are more familiar there than I am with AFC rules. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AVS Video Editor has been accepted

AVS Video Editor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Accents 05:41, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AVS Video Converter (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AVS Video Converter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NeviRom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AVS Video Converter (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SSTflyer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AVS Video Converter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

sst^flyer 16:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NeviRom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! sst^flyer 16:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question

The question was archived without any answers. It has just been a couple of weeks since your draft was rejected again, and the problem seems to be that the article is nothing but a list, and does not explain, using indpendent sources that cover the subject in detail, why this software is notable. Once you have done that, the features and capabilities can probably be included but shouldn't be quite as much a part of the article. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, so that should not be your primary objective.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]