User talk:Neutralhappy

Welcome!

Hi Neutralhappy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Variyan Kunnathu Kunjahammed Haji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Investigation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 17:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Malabar rebellion. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recollecting attacks against hindus in Malabar Rebellion into a single section

Hi Neutralhappy! I can see that you have been making a lot of edits to the page Malabar Rebellion lately. I needed your help in recollecting all the attacks , murders , exodus, rape accounts related to this event into a single section in this page called == Persecution of Hindus ==

Currently all such events are scattered over the page in different sections , but considering this is a major point of discussion related to this event , are you interested in this and will you help me with this? Extorc (talk)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am committed to follow Wikipedia's rules and policies and respect page-specific restrictions very strictly. In case you have disagreement with my edits, you need not escalate the issue to get me imposed section on. Rather I humbly request you to contact me to get the problem solved by myself first. Or you can edit, revert, undo et cetera to my edits by yourself without even discussing with me. I am in no way interest in disruption. Neutralhappy (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neutralhappy, it is a bit more complicated than that. The discretionary sanctions regime expects you to learn and apply Wikipedia policies. Failure to do so causes disruption to other editors.

You are now extended-confirmed. So I was surprised that you made a blatantly WP:OR edit this morning, which had to be reverted. I recommend that you take the Wikipedia Adventure tour. It takes may be half an hour, but at the end of it you will feel much more confident of how things work. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion. I believe saying the Popular Front of India is anti-Sangha Privar is not that blatantly original research. Enmity between the two has been widely reported in newspapers. By the way I accept your suggestion for better sources. I think you would agree the Popular Front of India is anti-RSS or anti-BJP more than saying it anti-Sangh Parivar because more sources are available for that.

Neutralhappy (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was adding in the first line. And the term should be mentioned by reliable source not religious websites, PFI's own websites, statements from PFI members and leaders. If Ukraine president speaks against Putin, so his Wikipedia page's first line should not be written as Volodymyr Oleksandrovych is an anti-Putin politician in the first line. This article's talk page edit request history, and protection log shows that some COI editors have tried to removed sourced negative content and show the article positively. Knight Skywalker (talk) 06:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Variyan Kunnathu Kunjahammed Haji. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 10:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you misunderstood. The discussions were started before the page reched here. Most of them either have been solved or no longer needed. The discussion is some months old. After that the page included so much information about the subject and its widely cited so many criticism also have been added. Moreover the page is no longer protected. So any one can edit freely.

By the way because of your opinion, I have decided to just solve the problem with very few deletion. Neutralhappy (talk) 10:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your opinion. Neutralhappy (talk) 10:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page guidelines

Hi Neutralhappy, can you review the talk page guidelines at HELP:TALK and practise them? I find your posts a bit disjointed, with too much white space, and lines with leading space (which causes a verbatim format on Wikipedia). -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, Neutralhappy,

You can not tag pages for speedy deletion and then make up your own reason why a page should be deleted. Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you are aware of what the accepted deletion criteria are and when they apply. For the redirect, you should nominate it for discussion at WP:RFD.

If you have questions about Wikipedia's deletion processes, please bring them to WP:TEAHOUSE. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for deletion is made much easier if you start using Twinkle. It will offer you possible reasons for deletion you can select from, nominate a page for a deletion discussion and, most importantly, post a notification of the deletion tagging on the talk page of the page creator which is an important step in every deletion process. I highly recommend you become familiar with it if you expect to tag pages for deletion or other problems. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onam and Islam

Hey, I'm thinking of spliting the article on Onam section about Islam. It has got enough references for that. Interested? Drop by if so. Thanks and happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Banu Qurayza

Hello! I saw that you had made some edits to the page of Muhammad. I had suggested an edit on the Banu Qurayza section and had provided sources in the talk page. I can't edit the page myself because I haven't been granted permission. If you don't mind, I request you to implement the edit. If there is any problem my suggestion, please let me know. Thank you! QcTheCat (talk) 16:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Onam and Muslims, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samastha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Neutral Barnstar
		The Neutral Barnstar may be awarded to editors that have fixed articles that did not adhere to WP:NPOV. This is for your edits to Muhammad. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Onam and Islamic Preachers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onam and Islamic Preachers, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onam and Muslims until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]