Hi. Thanks, for good Wikipedia changes review. You set 2 maintenance templates to PostCSS. I totally agree with them.
I asked other developers to find problems with article neutral point of view, si I think first template is just question of time.
But could you help me with second template about references? Wikipedia:External links is very big rule. Could you point what exactly links have problems?
I fount only that some links could not be avoided, because they “Social networking sites”. But I use it to link official point of PostCSS (Twitter is a official feedback channel for PostCSS) and to prove “recognized authority” words (like Sass author words about PostCSS). Is it only the problem? I need to remove all links to social network?
--A.I. (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
