User talk:NettspendNuggies

November 2024

Hello, I'm 81.2.123.64. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to President of Moldova have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

who are you to decide if my edits are constructie or not NettspendNuggies (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Grigore Eremei, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jiffles1 (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at President of Moldova, you may be blocked from editing. Jiffles1 (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Joyous! Noise! 15:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NettspendNuggies (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was on the wrong article and was trying to make my own I am sorry NettspendNuggies (talk) 21:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have no idea what this appeal is supposed to mean, but it's certainly not a reason to unblock you. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.