User talk:Jiffles1

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jiffles1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

I love your spelling patrol, Jiffles. Keep up the good work. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:01, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jiffles1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jiffles1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jody Wilson-Raybould

Thanks! GentleDjinn (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jiffles1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides

Thanks for your updates to the article. I rewrote and expanded it several months ago, and have more-or-less been curating it since then. However, I am a dial-up user and struggling somewhat with the recent attention to the sizeable article. I would like to promote it at Wikipedia:In the news when I can get some sources and sufficiently update the article body. One note:

We may need a better source for McArthur is the most-prolific known serial killer in Toronto. as the source was originally hypothesizing on it and is several months out of date (it does not rule out that there has been another more prolific serial killer since then).

Thanks again, and please ping me and let me know if you're going to continue working on the article. Edit conflicts are a major headache for me. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Please familiarize yourself with MOS:INSTITUTIONS. We capitalize a word like "legislature" if it's appearing in the full proper name of a specific legislature — that is, you do capitalize it if you're actually writing "the Legislature of Ontario" — but not if you're just writing "the legislature" as a generic shorthand for a specific legislature. See links like this and this for examples — we follow standard writing style here, not corporate writing style with its constant overcapitalizations. Bearcat (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:34, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Regardless of whether they were defeated last night or retired from politics and didn't even reoffer at all, an outgoing MP's term in office ends with the writ drop. So for an MP who isn't coming back to Ottawa, the end date for their term is September 11, not October 21. Please see WP:CANSTYLE#Terms in office. Bearcat (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jiffles1

Thank you for creating Joan O'Malley.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

An interesting and well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Joan Bamford Fletcher, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Joan Bamford Fletcher, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Joan Bamford Fletcher

Hello! Your submission of Joan Bamford Fletcher at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Joan Bamford Fletcher at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Emma Woikin

Hello, Jiffles1,

Thank you for creating Emma Woikin.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi thanks for creating the article. Please link it to other articles wherever it's appropriate.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rejoy2003}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 06:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Jiffles1, and thank you for creating several detailed biographies of Canadian women. It looks to me as if you would be a useful member of Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. You can join from the link at the top of our Wikiproject page- Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gouzenko Affair

On 27 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gouzenko Affair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Gouzenko Affair marked the beginning of the Cold War in Canada? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gouzenko Affair. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gouzenko Affair), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Graves Article

Jiffles1,

I noticed you edited down some additions I made to the Frank Graves (pollster) page. I appreciate your clarifications on the language and structure. But I worry you also selectively removed critical, unflattering, but well-sourced facts about Mr Graves' past conduct. I hope that is not for the sake of advocacy and promotion.

I note that your first articles created back in 2009 were to create the pages for Mr. Graves and his company, Ekos Research Associates. You have been routinely editing these pages over the intervening years and adding content that it seems only a close relationship or colleague would be aware of. As per WP:COI, directly editing a page to which you hold a personal/financial interest or have an external relationship to is strongly discouraged. However a conflicted party can still propose edits in the talk page which they would like other editors to consider making (see WP:COIEDIT).

Do you have an undisclosed connection to Frank Graves and/or Ekos Research Associates? If so, are you willing to abide by WP:COI? I assume good faith and am happy to discuss the facts with you.

Be well.

Balancingakt (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jiffles1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Balancingakt (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Canada convoy protest

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1191027343 you removed saying that the comment is about vaccine mandates. No, you are incorrect. The professor said that in relation to emergency act invoked by Canada in response to the truckers convoy. Please read the news citation, original tweet to understand the chronology.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1191027159. First comments from other prominent figures were removed (e.g. indocanadian Sikhs and MP) in https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1186892450 then you removed the last one. That's how news are sanitized sadly.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1190595551 the section is about media opinion so you removing it saying that it is opinion is not correct reasoning. The second point is that the backlash was not severe, you are just moving the goalpost to sanitize the document.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1190597999 you claim nyt is already discussed. Fair enough, then remove just that. Why are removing the other news and commentators? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mittgaurav (talk • contribs) 23:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for reaching out. As I'm sure you've noticed, the Canada convoy protest article is running quite long and I've been trying to condense it bit by bit. I've been focusing on removing material that either gets repeated or that I don't feel adds anything to the article.

With regards to Saad's comments, I didn't feel they warranted a mention (let alone an entire paragraph) since he wasn't a major figure in the convoy protests, he isn't a major public figure in general, and he does not appear to be an expert on the subject matter. We can't include every comment that anyone has ever made about the protests and we have to make decisions about what is worth including and what isn't.

Some of the material I removed ran into other issues as well. For instance, I removed this sentence since it runs afoul of Wikpedia's policy on maintaining a neutral point of view; statements like "Several news outlets... pointed out the hypocrisy in the Canadian politicians" are not encyclopedic language. I removed this sentence and this sentence since they run into problems with original research; it other words, we can't combine sources to draw conclusions that aren't mentioned in any of the individual sources. Also, the latter sentence was sourced exclusively to an opinion piece, which are not generally accepted as sources.

Anyways, I hope this clears up my reasoning (I realize my edit summaries can be overly brief at times). Cheers! Jiffles1 (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ed Broadbent

On 14 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ed Broadbent, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kathleen Wynne

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kathleen Wynne, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi Jiffles1. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 09:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi Jiffles1! No worries at all! I’m an active rollbacker on another Wikipedia, and I just wanted to stop by here to help out with some anti-vandalism patrolling. And by the way, congrats on the recently assigned rollback! Cheers! Tres Libras (talk) 02:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was using Huggle and the page refreshed with your edit just as I hit 'revert' - tried to abort, but my reflexes apparently aren't what they used to be. Anyways, welcome to (this) Wikipedia! Happy editing! Jiffles1 (talk) 02:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]