User talk:Nescio vos

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Nescio vos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! nableezy - 15:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 15:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

Hello Did you ever edit under any other user names in wikipedia?Thanks--Shrike (talk) 17:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I never had other accounts. Why? Have I done anything wrong? Nescio vos (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know becouse I have not checked your edits in depth anyhow as there is a lot of banned editors its a letigamate question.As the I/P area is a convtreversal one please be aware that if you don't edit according to wikipedia rules you may face sanctions.--Shrike (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many of Necio vos's edits are undue, in the sense that he is adding extensive, cherry-picked details from very minor, borderline news-worthy articles to a lot of I/P pages. I'll sift through his edits to make sure he following wiki policy. In an number of edits he also practises WP:OR. For example adding articles about "Jewish only car parking" to the Israeli apartheid analogy, even though there's no mention of apartheid in the article that he is citing. Avaya1 (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nescio vos, one thing that would benefit your editing habits would be if you did not create entire new sections across multiple articles on the basis of a single incident mentioned in a newspaper. As User:Avaya1 pointed out, oftentimes this leads to issues of WP:UNDUE. It also is resulting in WP:RECENTISM at various articles you've edited, as well as WP:OFFTOPIC. Remember that Wikipedia articles are in essence encyclopedia articles: their structure should be integrative, not fragmented; cohesive, not erratic. Not everything that sounds interesting in the news needs to be mentioned on Wikipedia, and in fact "most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion." Regarding WP:OR, that is above all the most serious criticism relating to your edits, so be particularly careful not to incorporate your own interpretations as part of the process of adding information to articles. I have suggested that if you don't acknowledge the issues raised here or don't adjust your editing patterns to take these issues into account, a WP:RFC/U may be necessary down the road.—Biosketch (talk) 12:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will be mindful of the above comments from Avaya1 and Biosketch, in particular about WP:OR, though I am not sure I agree with all of them.Nescio vos (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Nescio. I have reverted some of your edits because you mention some works as famous, ground-breaking, etc. but only provided a self-reference to support your claims which is against WP:SELFSOURCE. Please be careful when you make claims of fame. Other editors have already notified you about it. Thank you. EternalFlare (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alstom

Hi - no real problem - but it's not usuaal to report contracts a company didn't win eg diff (becuase this happens all the time..) unless there's a special reason. I assume it's mentioned it the right places and will delete this from Alstom unless it is a special case. Thanks.Oranjblud (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I noticed you have already deleted the relevant text. In fact there was a special reason: there was a call for boycott of Alstom as a result of its work on the Jerusalem Light Railway. See Abbas Al Lawati (2009-11-17). "Plea to boycott firms with Israel link". Gulf News. I should have been more explicit perhaps. Nescio vos (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Scjessey. I noticed that you made a change to an article, State religion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 14:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now provided the citation and reinstated. Hope that's OK.Nescio vos (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Torriano Primary - main gate through Gatehouse Building.jpg

Hello, Nescio vos. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Torriano Primary - main gate through Gatehouse Building.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Torriano School Junior building.jpg

Hello, Nescio vos. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Torriano School Junior building.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Torriano Primary - Infants building.jpg

Hello, Nescio vos. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Torriano Primary - Infants building.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Torriano Primary Cloud Kingdom.jpg

Hello, Nescio vos. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Torriano Primary Cloud Kingdom.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Torriano Primary - main gate through Gatehouse Building.jpg

Hello, Nescio vos. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Torriano Primary - main gate through Gatehouse Building.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps Andy Mingay) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nescio vos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nescio vos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nescio vos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Torriano Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torriano Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torriano Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Torriano Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torriano Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torriano Primary School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]