User talk:Nequa.s
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Nequa.s, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of Bengali films of 2013. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Tito Dutta (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- You corrected that error very fast! I was also going to correct it! --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Use this article for Bangladeshi films! --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:57, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mumbai Blown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anita Hossain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Something Borrowed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm Macaddct1984. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Anita Hossain, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Mumbai Blown has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirage (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Rahsaan Islam for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahsaan Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahsaan Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 18:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ismat Alamgir for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ismat Alamgir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismat Alamgir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 18:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Deceptive content
[edit]Hi there, this edit of yours at The Spectacular Jihad of Taz Rahim seems very deceptive to me. You made a claim that the film received a 100% rating, which is clearly not true. The value 100% appears nowhere on that page. There are zero critical reviews at Rotten Tomatoes, which makes it irresponsible to claim that the critical consensus was "The film was perfectly cast and Taz Rahim was amazing..." The only prose found on that page is found in a user review. We do not incorporate user reviews into articles. For all anybody knows, you wrote the user review. Please be very careful not to improperly represent facts in articles. While you probably did not have ill intentions, and maybe you were confused, this sort of editing can look very much like an attempt to inflate a subject by adding bogus content. If you do it again, I will have no choice but to seek administrative remedy. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Unexplained removal of sourced content and templates
[edit]Hi, in this edit you removed a useful {{Film date}} template, the content in the template, and the reference that supported the content. Please don't do this without an adequate explanation. The Film date template is intended to make it easier for the infobox to present the content, it's also used by services like Google to interpret the content in the article. Additionally, since the data was sourced, changing it without providing an explanation or another reference is problematic. Please use the talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 15:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You are strongly urged to respond to this talk page discussion, because I'm of the opinion you are adding deliberately deceptive content to this article. I'd like to extend to you an opportunity to convince me otherwise, in case I am wrong, before I raise the matter at ANI. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Curse of the Kohinoor for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curse of the Kohinoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curse of the Kohinoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savonneux (talk) 05:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Nequa.s. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nequa.s. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nequa.s. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bengali Beauty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for March 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Rahsaan Noor
- Kings of Devon
- added a link pointing to Bengali
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Coco & Nut moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Coco & Nut. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because "Generally speaking, and due to the vagaries of film production, films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should usually not have their own articles" (WP:Too soon). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 07:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nice article, but a bit too soon for the mainspace. Film articles are generally made after principle photography has begun. Improve it in draft space for now until June/July :D Justiyaya 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Coco & Nut
[edit]Hello, Nequa.s. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Coco & Nut".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)