User talk:Neostinker

Welcome!

Hello Neostinker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 17:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ecka.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecka.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rocky_In_Frontroom.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocky_In_Frontroom.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:42, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sn00ker

hi -- thanks for the comment on this page. I totally agree. Note that the page has been tagged with proposed deletion, so it will be deleted in a few days if no one contests it. In the future, if you see pages like that, feel free to tag them with {{prod|reason for deletion}}. best, bikeable (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

images

hi -- do any images appear for you? are you only having trouble with images that you uploaded, or do you not see any images at all on wikipedia? for example, on God, do you see a picture of a Michaelangelo painting, or just an X? bikeable (talk) 21:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Lagoon

Thanks for adding the item on the Blue Lagoon to Milton Keynes. You'll see that I've made the pic smaller and edited the text down a bit. To compensate, I've copied the text and a bigger picture in the Bletchley, Milton Keynes article. The reason for this is that the MK article is rather seriously over-length for anyone with an ordinary modem to download. So it has to have just pointers to more detailed articles. Great pic, by the way! If you are going to the Bowl this summer, the National Bowl article could do with a really good crowd scene. Loads of other articles in [[Category:Milton Keynes]] could do with some more input. --Concrete Cowboy 12:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The major articles have plenty of pics but the minor ones don't have much at all. See WikiCommons

For example, no Milton Keynes redway system pic, we need something maybe at the teardrop lakes, something that illustrates what is being said in the text, ideally with someone cycling on it! better still a family. The Balancing lake article could use a close up of the engineering at Willen, Furzton or Caldecotte as well as some ducks and dinghies. No need to set out to do it, just carry a camera and if you see something interesting, take a pic. By the way the Bletchley, Milton Keynes#Blue Lagoon could do with some history of the place - all I know is that it was a clay pit for Newton Longville brick works. --Concrete Cowboy 17:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kitten_Celeste.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kitten_Celeste.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Affenpinscher Picture

I've fixed the image. I disagree that yours is a better image for the article. It may show the face full-on, but it doesn't show the whole dog. It's also very dark. But there is room in the article for more than one image, I would suggest leaving the full dog image in the infobox and adding your image outside the box. And you can always expand the article to give a better balance of course ;)

By the way, it's usual here to add new messages to the bottom of the page, and you can sign by typing four tildes after your message (~~~~). -- sannse (talk) 07:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Tarjaemppu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tarjaemppu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Help

All you need to do is add the link to the site where you got the image from to the image page. Just click edit at the top of the image information page here and type the url of the site there. That will show the source nicely. -- sannse (talk) 18:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hole in the doughnut effect

Hi, the article that you created, Hole in the doughnut effect has been listed as an article for deletion here on the grounds that it is original research. You may be interested in contributing to the discussion. You appear to know your way around wikipedia but I'd be happy to provide assistance if you required. MLA 12:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help with any particular issues that you might have.

Regarding the AfD discussion, in order to be a wikipedia article Hole in the doughnut effect needs to be a verifiable term, needs to be notable in some way, and needs to be sourced. The onus is on the article creators and editors to show that these criteria have been met. In the case of this article, it's not currently very clear what the effect refers to which makes it hard for other editors to see how it should be kept. For instance, if it is taught at GCSE then there will likely be some textbooks that can be referenced. My understanding of the article is that it essentially refers to centralisation of shopping preferences but I can't see that it's a verifiable and notable phrase but it might be of interest as part of an article on shopping malls. An example of another short article on shopping centers is Gruen transfer which is written in an encyclopedic style and has external links to show sourcing. MLA 12:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You added a sources section to the article but it's not quite what editors are going to be looking for. Taking the above example of Gruen transfer, there's an external links section which has URLs that provide the evidence for the information contained in the article. There's a lengthy page at Wikipedia:Citing_sources that discusses how to cite sources but the best two bets are to either have an external site to link to, or to have a book such as a core GCSE geography textbook as an explicit source. The source that you added would itself be better off being sourced as it's more of a claim that this subject is covered in GCSE geography which you know to be true but other editors can't verify. MLA 07:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile From Slithean

Slithean has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

It's the Fear

Just letting you know that the article It's the Fear which you created has been nominated for deletion. You're most welcome to join the debate at its AfD listing. BigHaz 03:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD discussions

One doesn't have to be an administrator to comment on AFD discussion pages. The main reason that you'll find that some editors there are adminstrators is that someone willing to devote time to such a mop-and-bucket job usually ends up being offered a mop and a bucket. ☺ (Being an administrator just means that the community trusts one, based upon one's record, to wield certain, more powerful, editing tools in the best interests of the project. I've often thought that trusty would have been a better name. ☺) The most important thing at AFD is not whether one is an administrator or not. It's whether one can form a good solid reason for keeping or for deleting an article based upon our Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and whether one is willing to put in the effort of doing the basic research necessary in order to determine whether an article satisfies our criteria or not (Sometimes, it's not a trivial amount of work.) and then write up a detailed rationale. If one does that, then it doesn't matter even if one is a wholly anonymous user who hasn't even created an account. Uncle G 23:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MK Pics

Well, the top priority must be to replace the blank patches on the Commons galleries, since these are the source of the images used on many of the MK pages. --Concrete Cowboy 12:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary Schools in MK

If you have time, the Category:Schools in Milton Keynes is very thin, loads of secondary schools need articles. Try only to use quotes from Ofsted reports as per Stantonbury Campus, no rude remarks! --Concrete Cowboy 17:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff. Don't forget the Category lines. Secondaries should be the priority as there are about 80 primaries! --Concrete Cowboy 12:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Grey School

You need to be very careful when writing about controversial issues to Wikipedia:Cite your sources and be careful that you don't break the WP:NOR rule. It has to be factual, not opinion. Check out the changes I made to your edits of Lord Grey School. --Concrete Cowboy 17:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Despina Pavlou

Even through you are probably right, you can't say she has been sacked unless and until you can cite an independent source. The Citizen has nothing on it. I reverted. --Concrete Cowboy 18:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Koumquat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Koumquat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Random Hand

The article was deleted because there was nothing in it to indicate that the band was notable per the guidelines of WP:MUSIC. If you were about to add such information and I deleted too quickly, I apologize. NawlinWiki 17:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colourful

Sorry, it was an accident; but I'm glad you like it! Your welcome doesn't exactly fit, but the idea is true for this! So, your welcome! Salutations my fellow humans (I think your human at least...) [[User: Randfan|'''Randfan'''[[Image:Inverted Pentagram.svg|10px]]|[[User_talk:Randfan|''click me, speak to me'']]]] 21:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Animals Count"

Hi.I deleted the article on Animals Count and its president, since the party was created in December 2006 as a joke, and hence lacks notability. Hope this is OK with you, but I think this does not belong in an encyclopedia -- Chris 73 | Talk 16:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even the president admitted it is a joke party. I think it is not notable. If necessary,we can put the party through WP:AFD -- Chris 73 | Talk 16:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it is around after a year or so and has some press coverage, I would not mind keeping the article. Thanks for your understanding -- Chris 73 | Talk 16:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support; Animals Count has received a lot of support and media coverage, see www.animalscount.org. Jasmijn de Boo, Chair Animals Count

Image:Part_of_Blue_Lagoon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Part_of_Blue_Lagoon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this image is the one with the blue bag in it (I wondered what that was...). Images must be listed at IFD for 5 days, which is why this image hasn't been deleted yet. I will make a note there that this is a "semi-redundant" image of the Image:Gnarled Tree.jpg. --MECU≈talk 20:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jasmijn De Boo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jasmijn De Boo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kitten Celeste.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kitten Celeste.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Khallos.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Khallos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Core desat 02:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Milton Keynes

You might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Milton_Keynes? --Concrete Cowboy 17:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might now be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Buckinghamshire. We expanded the scope so that more people might be interested, but there are plans for a Milton Keynes specific task force also. Severo^TC 21:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in Sigmund Freud

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please read the manual of style regarding flags before inserting flags in articles in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 22:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mikedickin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mikedickin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image Help

This one's a bit strange... the image you uploaded is fine, but it's actually white "Superdrug" logo on a transparent background. It's pretty useless right now, but I can make it black when I get some free time. east.718 at 01:33, April 15, 2008

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Neostinker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 430 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Martin Kesici - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Issue- 11 Jean Grey. Phoenix.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Issue- 11 Jean Grey. Phoenix.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarja DCW.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tarja DCW.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holne Chase Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holne Chase Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holne Chase Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pit-yacker (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reconstruction of automobile destruction

The article Reconstruction of automobile destruction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable study. The article is more than five years old and still has no independent refs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Despina Pavlou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Despina Pavlou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Despina Pavlou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lead Singer.jpg

The file File:Lead Singer.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused low-quality image. Plenty of high-quality images at DragonForce so it's not necessary to retain this one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of White Spire School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Spire School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Spire School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Morgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Morgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Morgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]