User talk:Neosinan

Problems with upload of File:One of the three concept design of TFX.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:One of the three concept design of TFX.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:One of the three concept design of TFX.jpeg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:One of the three concept design of TFX.jpeg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aster (missile family) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

area defence''" mission requirement. It comes in the form of the [[Eurosam]] '''SAMP'''/'''T''' ('''S'''urface-to-'''A'''ir '''M'''issile '''P'''latform/'''T'''errain. The French Ministry of
345,Turkey dismisses NATO allies’ bids, selects Chinese firm for air defense system tender], 26 September 2013.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Georgy Zhukov may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

how little he care for his soldiers life and how he sacrified his soldilers to win Battles. <ref> {{|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUWLTIXWo0A|</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the TAI TFX page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:One of the three concept design of TFX.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:One of the three concept design of TFX.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing

Please, stop reverting sourced edits made by me or other editor. Use talk pages instead of reverting good faith edits. This warning comes after your disruptive bahaviour at the content on Bayraktar TB2 article. Mr.User200 (talk) 14:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 09:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neosinan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm accused of harassment. The reason I am accused of this was editing I made to Bayraktar TB2 article last year. At the time article was stating 47 Bayraktar drone was destroyed in Libyan conflict. I changed this number because It was from Russian propaganda sources. Right now, This issue has been fixed by later edites made after Russo-Ukrainian War started as this drone is effectively used in that war. So the Point I made is proved correct and I should be clear from harassment charges. So the Block is not necessary anymore. And I am not suckpuppet of any other account. You can google my username and you can find my accounts with same username on twitter, reddit and on varies other forums which some of them are over 10 years old.

Decline reason:

First, just because you were proved right does not let you off the hook for how you behaved before then. Second, I find this Suspiciously Specific Denial of sockpuppetry, which you weren't accused of, very troubling. Daniel Case (talk) 06:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wasn't the whole point of Wikipedia access to correct information? I was literally objecting to Russian propaganda? That's big problem on the internet right now, Isn't it? And secondly you can check my talk page and you can see whether or not I was accused of being suck puppet. If battling with Russian propaganda isn't welcomed here, maybe i shouldn't be here. Neosinan (talk) 11:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]