User talk:Neolexx

Orphaned non-free media (File:Halo (series) bogus screen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Halo (series) bogus screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rather weird to talk with a bot :-) but in case some human reader comes here... The image in question (a screen shot of a Wikipedia page open in Firefox) was uploaded to illustrate my forum notice Halo (series) article hijacked for a few hours. I guess in one week it will be OK to delete it as no actual anymore. In case if I always can reload it. --NeoLexx (talk) 12:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. you sent me here.

[[1]] how I got here

as I understand it, the video recording of the news release with the addition of subtitles in English is not an authoritative source (this is the opinion of the administrator). THIS administrator, without giving arguments called my sources are not respected, even if this news release. even if there is a videotape of the issue. even if this entry has a subtitle translation. even if this video is watched in the United Nations(a source that is so, is there a source that the UN deployed this recording in their investigations).

today corrected 1 source transferring from YouTube on web site (free copyright and not a forum)/ all the same, because actually you can make a request to the fact that the source of authoritative (there are in the forum a special page). and again make my edit? for the sake of democracy ;)

[[2]] page discussion of this issue

here you can in Russian? I can write in English is much better, but it will be long and inconvenient for me. language taught long ago, machine translates across the paragraph so that the lost meaning. Rqasd (talk) 13:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.pressenza.com/2013/01/syria-an-alternate-reality-interview-with-anastasia-popova/ well and put a fix, according to the correspondent of media such)text. because not be able to find fault?

I can write Russian, English or French I don't care. Just I don't think that something going to happen with Syria right today :-) and I'd love to finish my Christmas decorations article in Russian, I have "now editing" template on it. --NeoLexx (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ну буду правила учить тогда) а о в статье глава в ней 5 пунктов о нарушениях со стороны 1 и ничего о стороне 2.Rqasd (talk) 14:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

привет. сможете перевести на *красивый* английский 2 маленьких абзаца?Rqasd (talk) 06:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

‎"An Authentical cyberpunk outfit for the summer 1991"

Hello, this subject is off-topic for the Village Pump. However, you may be able to get comments from elsewhere, such as IRC channels related to fiction. --Pine^✉ 04:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, уважаемый, просьба к вам

Доброго времени суток, Всеволод. 2 года тому назад Вами была удалена статья "Украинцы в Москве" с 30 авторитетными источниками. Некоторое время спустя вы пообещали восстановить ее и даже делали наброски у себя в черновике (песочница). Хотелось бы поинтересоваться, когда эта статья будет восстановлена. Ведь глупо отрицать наличие украинцев в Москве, по переписи 2010 года- это вторая по численности национальная группа Москвы, и это только неофициальные данные. Мы бы хотели дружественных и равноправных отношений. Мне кажется раз есть статьи о русских во Львовской области, русских в Закарпатье и других регионах Украины, то и о московских украинцах должна быть статья. Пожалуйста, решите этот вопрос, тем более вы уже начали писать статью о московских украинцах у себя в черновике. С уважением к вам, Всеволод и заранее благодарю за адекватное решение этого вопроса. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.176.3.232 (talk) 12:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

А что здесь-то, а не на моей СО в ru-wiki, для конспирации? ;-) Статью ту снесли не в рамках всероссийского антиукраинского заговора, а потому что там был полный черт-те что и сбоку бантик. Так что два года ждать вовсе не нужно было, хоть на следующий день какую свою крепкую заготовку предложить вместо удалённого. Вспомнил (не сразу) про заготовку. Готовы ждать (сроков не себя никаких не беру) - ждите. Также можете писать идеи и материал на СО заготовки. Она у меня в списке наблюдения. Только строго по делу. --Neolexx (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canada Centre in Metula moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Canada Centre in Metula, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I will do it. --Neolexx (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Canada Centre in Metula

Hello, Neolexx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canada Centre in Metula".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]