User talk:NeoBrute

This is NeoBrute's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:GlorySec has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GlorySec. Thanks! gobonobo ⁺ ^c 08:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GlorySec (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of notability? The majority of citations are to unreliable sources like Telegram, YouTube, Twitter, etc. Large sections of text are completely unsourced. Please remove the external links from the body of the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GlorySec and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 17:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NeoBrute! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 17:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, NeoBrute, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Halelujahsoldier1 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. C F A 💬 17:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I can confirm that I am not editing under multiple accounts, anyone assisting me is simply others who also know about the topic I'm writing about in the cyber world. Seeing as the group was named top 15 threat actors on census, it is understandable that some people want a central place to see all of the information on this group. I began writing simply because I saw it as an opportunity to train my writing skills, contribute and add more to Wikipedia. I was quite surprised to see the heavy contributions of others on this page, but I am happy as it has given me a lot to work with NeoBrute (talk) 22:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]