User talk:Nemo 838

Nemo 838, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nemo 838! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

WP:INDICSCRIPT

Hi. Please review the consensus on WP:INDICSCRIPT. Please also note that editing against consensus (which, in this case, means repeatedly adding indic scripts to articles) is considered disruptive and can lead to WP:blocks and/or bans. --regentspark (comment) 17:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander_the_Great, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop edit warring, you've been reverted several times but continue to make the same unhelpful and disruptive edit. UCaetano (talk) 09:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Shimla. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ofcourse, I will keep that in mind. Nemo 838 (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mughal Empire; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. regentspark (comment) 01:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagat Singh

You reverted a removal of mine a Bhagat Singh with this edit. You did not explain why but I did give an explanation for taking it out, which fundamentally is covered by WP:OVERCITE - the source is unnecessary because the next source in the section verifies the information anyway. - Sitush (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do also note that you should not mark any revert you do, unless it is clearly vandalism, as minor. In this case, you reverted an edit that came with a justification in the edit summary as a minor edit, a definite no-no. Please read WP:ME. --regentspark (comment) 13:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest article

I don't remember, and I'm not sure what IP address I was using in those days but I think the first article may have been Wales. Deb (talk) 08:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hi Nemo 838! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mughal Empire that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 19:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 20:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor

You have been adviced about this before. This edit cannot by any stretch of imagination be considered a minor edit. Please see WP:MINOR: Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. Continuing to do so after having been adviced about it several times can be considered disruptive. --T*U (talk) 15:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Your addition to Draft:General Post Office, Shimla has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hut 8.5 18:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratibha Ranta (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references from independent, reliable sources are needed (wiki pages and fan sites are not reliable). Note that reliable sources in other languages can also be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratibha Ranta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pratibha Ranta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copypaste content at Convent of Jesus and Mary, Shimla

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent copyright infringement, disruptive editing and block evasion from your previous account Special:Contributions/John Mactsvish 838.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 07:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]