User talk:Nedvol

Welcome!

Hello, Nedvol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the HBF Stadium page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Adam Armstrong, from its old location at User:Nedvol/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Armstrong (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Armstrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nedvol, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adam Armstrong has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adam Armstrong. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Armstrong (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

Please see the AFC reviewer comment by Theroadislong. "This appears to be a family history project written in an essay style and not really suitable for an encyclopedia it includes a lot of unreferenced, original research and not enough in depth coverage in reliable sources"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Armstrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh

you have been through the hoops - please note that we have a group of editors here in WA who can help - when and if required - see

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Western_Australia

JarrahTree 06:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Theroadislong. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Nedvol, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Theroadislong (talk) 07:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adam Armstrong has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adam Armstrong. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gallop family (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gallop family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Just wanted to say a quick thanks for creating the page about Captain Adam Armstrong. I had made a couple of unsuccessful attempts at this in 2014, so it's great to see that you were successful and Mr Armstrong finally has his place on wikipedia. Very well written article, good job! MadMark80 (talk) 10:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gallop family concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gallop family, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gallop family

Hello, Nedvol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gallop family".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cons_4912_CD_0449.jpg

Hi Nedvol,

The copyright to this image "is owned by or licensed to the State of Western Australia through the State Records Office of Western Australia (SRO) and State Records Commission of Western Australia (SRC), unless otherwise stated." So the image may need to be removed. If I got it wrong, please accept my sincerest apologies.

I’m sorry you seem to have had a rough time getting stuff up. Betterkeks (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hot pool plan.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hot pool plan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.