User talk:Necron681

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CyberPatriot.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CyberPatriot concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CyberPatriot, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Necron681, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Challenge coin. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited in the Sexism article. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 22:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Adding: Your edit warring at Sexism, and your rudeness here, are both unacceptable. Bishonen | talk 22:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

My rudeness, Bishonen? I used no slurs, foul, or other banned language. Any slights Flyer may have felt are due to her interpretation, I was simply making a point. If she gets offended by someone with an opposing opinion, that is not my fault. Also, my edit warring was due to people insisting on putting a spin on the article, cherry picking evidence for their side instead of presenting all of the information in the introduction part of the article.

You're being much too technical about this, Necron; there is actually no "banned language" per se on Wikipedia. Rudeness can be couched in any sort of language, for instance by using a condescending, sneering tone, as you did. I have no idea what "slights" Flyer may or may not have felt, as I haven't discussed it with her; I simply caught sight of your post immediately above the section on her page where I myself was discussing something completely different with her. Whether or not she took offense is beside the point; please don't poison the atmosphere here by attacking users ("I dont know who you think you are", "you can scurry back to your precious mods or admins", "you are perpetrating a lie") over a mere disagreement. As for your edit warring, don't edit war even if you think you're right. The three-revert rule (WP:3RR) is a bright-line rule that you were within one revert of violating. Note, however, that you can edit war without crossing the bright line, and you certainly did, reverting no less than three different users in a space of 13 minutes (!). I join with the SineBot below in asking you to please try to get into the habit of signing your posts. It matter less on your own page, but you don't seem to sign on other people's pages either. It's inconvenient to have to go to the history to see who's talking. Bishonen | talk 17:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid making personal attacks

Please refrain from making personally disparaging remarks and accusations toward other editors, as in this addition to User talk:Flyer22 Reborn. See Wikipedia:No personal attacks for more information. Concerns about the suitability of material on Wikipedia should be addressed on an article's talk page with reference to reliable sources. —Coconutporkpie (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC) Coconutporkpie (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, West Palm Beach, Florida, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 21:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]