User talk:Nayab Shareyar

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Hiba Qadir. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 15:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nayab Shareyar. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Hiba Qadir, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nayab Shareyar. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nayab Shareyar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am posting this here since you since you uploaded images on Hiba Qadir and claim to be the copyright holder, I suspect you may have a COI. Please declare. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not a COI and what is mean by that Nayab Shareyar (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm lacking in editing please kindly tell me the Basic edits of wikipedia Nayab Shareyar (talk) 15:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You know it took me a lot of time and effort to remove unreliable sources, yet you added them again despite my clear request. Why did you do that? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a suggestion which websites are belongs to reliable and unreliable sources meanwhile I'm sorry for wasting your time Nayab Shareyar (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ayeza Khan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Again, you will need consensus per WP:ONUS for this. CNMall41 (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Durefishan Saleem. Despite the warnings and being told to review WP:NEWSORGINDIA, you still continue to add these sources. Last warning. Do as you will. CNMall41 (talk) 03:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surefishan Saleem

A subheading is not needed for a single paragraph, especially when there is already a main headings. CNMall41 (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please review WP:NEWSORGINDIA as you continue to add them to pages and they are unreliable to use on Wikipedia. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank You Nayab Shareyar (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sending you this notice because I've observed that you've removed sourced content and added WP:OR using unreliable sources in BLPs. Since BLPs are contentious topics, you should exercise extra caution. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jishnu Raghavan (actor) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jishnu Raghavan (actor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Absolutely not. And adding to the SPI . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]