User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 9

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Biostudentgirl. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.PinklBabe 11:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Southbank Image Uploads

I have been given express permssion by the Southbank Centre to use a number of images to improve their Wikipedia entry. They provided me with the images, and the photographer in each case has been stated, and I believe I have chosen the correct copyright choice. Why have they been deleted? Thripman 15:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Medicine Comedy Troupe

This page was deleted for being a non-notable student group. I'm a somewhat concerned by that it was stated as the only comedy troupe in the nation that is entirely written, performed and produced by high school students. Now, it doesn't support that claim with a source. Nonetheless, the group has done research and is relatively positive that is a fact - until we provide a legitmate source will the page continue to be deleted, or with sources is it still likely to be deemed non-notable?Schlichtinator 03:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate on the above comment...the fact that Bad Medicine Comedy Troupe is the only comedy troupe in the country that is entirely student produced, written and directed and performed on a regular basis was highly researched and found to be most likely true. However, while I understand that "most likely true" isn't acceptable, it is--without a doubt--the only comedy troupe of that type in the state of Florida. I believe that that in itself makes it notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. An article about the troupe has been published in a local newspaper...is that a notable source? If the page is resotred or re-created, will it continue to be deleted? In addition, I cannot understand why the article on Lake Howell Theater Company was deleted. It is (again, without a doubt and easily proved to be) the only high school theater company in the state of Florida (and, again, most likely in the nation) to have performed over 150 shows in the past 10 years. In addition, they have won several awards and participated at the state level multiple times. Both pages were still being worked on on a daily basis--they were not complete and were deleted without so much as a note being left on a talk page or anything. Please consider...thank you. KennyBee 11:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I am new to wikipedia (as you could easily tell by looking at my contributions) and I cannot simply erect a new page in a day. I spent several long hours and days checking and reviewing sources, planning, sandboxing, and checking criteria. I (and others that edited the two above mentioned pages) made the mistake of not citing sources appropriately, however that is because both pages WERE STILL IN DEVELOPMENT. Under the guidelines of the Wikipedia:Attributions page I did use several acceptable sources however, including personal interviews with both several current and past members of both the theater company and the comedy troupe (primary source), in addition to the newspaper article(secondary source), research from the student and sponsor run Myspace accounts("questionable"-but as I understand it, acceptable-sources), information from press releases (again, secondary) and etc. I believe that both of these pages were unjustly deleted. And my apologies again--my "no note left on the page" comment referred to the fact that it was deleted and THEN the comment was added not the comment was added, given time for discussion and THEN deleted. KennyBee 13:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are the above sources adequate??? KennyBee 13:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the above corrections and citations were included, would the article be acceptable??? KennyBee 17:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Predator DNC

I know that I'm new to Wikipedia but I thought I was following the rules. I purposely made my article similar to other software products. Why did my Predator DNC article get deleted?

Ginny Sanchez

An article that I started (and you graciously approved) about the disc jockey Ginny Sanchez has a new notability dispute from a user who is a Ron and Fez and Opie and Anthony fan. The criterion used, based on this user's contribution history, appears to be whether or not Ms. Sanchez is a current "show character" on the specific radio show the editor listens to. ("wackbagger" is a term used for a fan of the Opie and Anthony or Ron and Fez shows, who also is a message board poster to wackbag.com.)

I am not about to remove this tag myself, but rather ask you to revisit the page to make a decision about user:whackbagger's notability tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glubdamn (talk • contribs) 13:58, 1 March 2007

Delle piane

The same user, using two different accounts, User:Chrysalis83 and User:Chrysalis99, has created this article four times today with the same nonsense content. Delete and salt? Thanks for looking into this. Darkspots 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D. Mikels Revisited (Briefly)

In just 5 minutes, I have found four articles about authors D. Mikels knows personally. All of them have self-published their books. Thanks once again for demonstrating your: 1) Inconsistency; and 2) Incompetence. Is it any wonder this website is not viewed with any credibility? Rock on, Wiki!

Demonstrative2627 15:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regards to the vandalism

Sorry this IP is used by every studen in the school over 400 computers.... It would be the students vandalizing the pages. - 66.240.30.54 13:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but you should not go deleting my stuff i put up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerry89 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 2 March 2007

Red Croatia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Serbian agresion on Montenegro. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. NawlinWiki 17:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC) I copied the preceding paragraph from this edit entitled "Testing in the article Serbian agresion on Montenegro". — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Red Croatia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 17:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC) I copied the preceding paragraph from this edit. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell are you doing?????

WHY do you destroy my work?

Do you really think that was "testing"??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GreaterCroatia (talk • contribs).

Why did you delete my question and ignore it??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreaterCroatia (talk • contribs) 17:52, March 1, 2007 (UTC)

I didn't delete your question, I archived it (I archive my talk page at the end of every month). As for a response, I explained my deletion of your pages above. In short, they both expressed a non-neutral point of view in violation of WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki 18:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC) I copied the preceding paragraph from this edit. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

? No they didn't. You violated Wikipedia's deletion policy simply because of yur personal agenda.

Yes, they (the pages) did express your point of view. Also, the statements you made were not backed by neutral point of view research. In addition, they were not verifiable. Thus, they constituted original research. I think NawlinWiki was correct in deleting them. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore my contributns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreaterCroatia (talk • contribs) 20:44, 2 March 2007

Since you have failed to convince NawlinWiki (the admin who deleted the Serbian agresion on Montenegro article which you created), you can list the page on Deletion Review for further discussion per the Wikipedia undeletion policy. You can also try to revert this edit. Instead of doing either of those things, if I were you I would find sources you can quote that can help you to create and improve those articles. And please, if you try to recreate an article on Serbian aggression on Montenegro, spell "aggression" correctly. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National Penis Day

Still waiting for that apology... --Nick Scratch 23:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The apology was posted to User talk:Nick Scratch in this edit. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, apology appreciated and accepted. --Nick Scratch 00:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drone (band)

hmmmm, I asked for a little more time, but you couldnt! I think its very rude of you just deleting my article on that foundation - I WAS FIXING IT GOD DAMIT! Now I will do it all over! Ramus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dronedk (talk • contribs) 13:05, 3 March 2007

Was it you removing all that I have spend my intire day on? drone (band) has been totally removed! THANKS ALOT FOR RUINING MY DAY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dronedk (talk • contribs) 15:25, 3 March 2007

Korilog

Ok, I undestrand the removal of the page. Apology... but why are there so many others pages about companies that are not deleted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KdOlivier (talk • contribs) 16:26, 3 March 2007

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 22:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Deletion of Page for Tero

The subject and entry I created regarding the global Tero currency was deleted for no apparent reason. This article was of international significance and represents the efforts, writing, and concepts of many people in the field of economics and global banking.

Please inform me as to why the article was deleted, and what needs to be done to recreate it.

The action seems to be malicious, unjust and petty.

Thanks. Jake Jacobs

--Kljacobs13 02:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Page for Grammarpalooza

The article that you deleted was not eligable for deletion due to the fact it was 'notable' - as the Grammarpalooza rock concert is a medium through which many bands have performed and used as a stepping stone on which to launch themselves onto the world music stage (see Dappled Cities Fly). It is quite possibly the only concert of its type in Australia where minors can perform to a large audience through such a medium. Also, it has lead to many bands now playing around Australia, as they were formed at Grammarpalooza. As you do not live in Australia, I must ask how you decided if the article was notable as you do not understand the context...

Reiterating the comments of Jake Jacobs, you seem to be deleting articles for no reason at all so I would suggest that you discuss the notability of the article with the author before you decide that is is not notable to yourself as you have not heard of it.

Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shagudiga (talk • contribs) 03:02, 4 March 2007

--Shagudiga — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shagudiga (talk • contribs) 03:04, 4 March 2007

74434

thanks for deleting that article. I had no idea what that nonsense was about. Mcoop06 03:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Creek Rage Crew

Hey i have another question. I'm a recent changes patroller and I noticed the artle "The Creek Rage Crew" I don't believe there is any notability to this article. maybe you could check it out since your an admin. Mcoop06 04:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! =] Mcoop06 04:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

David Robertson (wrestler), in my opinion, asserted notbility, so I have restored it. It can of course be "prod"ed or AfD'd. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 19:13 4 March 2007 (GMT).

The ghetto revival?

U are going to be sorry that you deleted the article because they are a growing band and company. It is important cause he was on TV and it was on a show enjoyed by millions. Ur lame for doing that. I hope you feel bad cause you hurt my feelings. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrownMorristown (talk • contribs) 23:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hank Braxtan

Hank Braxtan - I'm having a hard time understanding why the article on Hank Braxtan was deleted. Under the guidelines I read here on Wikipedia, filmmakers only need a significant fan base or notable works. Actually, he has both. First off, he is published under the IMDb, and they are quite specific on whom they will allow into their database as well. His movies have been premiered at Independent Film Festivals as well. Additionally, I checked to make sure the article would be allowed prior to starting it. Finally, I am confused as to why the article was "speedily deleted" when there might've been some question as to his notability. It was my understanding that in that situation, there was supposed to be some contest to it, or some discussion to take place. Please let me know what the issue is, and I can spend another 4 hours rewriting the article. Thank you. Steven Williamson 22:35 4 March 2007 EST

The Flypaper Cartel

Hello this is in regards to a deletion made sunday march 04, 2007. The page I created for the band The Flypaper Cartel was removed under the grounds that it did not meet criteria required for a page on a musical artist. In fact, there was an article published online and in the paper Los Angeles Alternative on friday, august 25th 2006, at 10:56 am. The article was titled "Side Stage" and subtitled "spotlighting the best of local music: The Flypaper Cartel." While creating the page, I searched the online records for a citation of this article and found that the newspaper deletes its archived articles after a certain period of time. This is a band I care very deeply about, and recognition on Wikipedia would be an exciting achievement. --User:MARTINtheHIRSH 03:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Zion (IRC)

Hi there.

You deleted my Zion (IRC) article.

As mentioned, it was work in progress.. I had to restart my computer. Maybe if I had posted that it would have made a difference? In any case, I'd like to rewrite it, this time making sure that should I save the page, there is significant assertion of notability.

Could you post the contents of the page in my talk page or email it to me@fusionstream.org.

Thanks a bunch,
Shawn.
BlueStream 15:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Admin; Should be banned

Yeh You deleted my topics about Creekers. Why? it was a description of the people in West Virigina. and Further more Dont delete my stuff with out asking — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerry89 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 March 2007

Well don't delete people's articles for no reason if you don't want people pissed at you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiManGreen (talk • contribs) 17:16, March 5, 2007 (UTC)

Gary peach

The difference in this story is that Gary Peach is a child worker and worked with very young children. Like I said in the discussion more info will be adding shortly, with quotes etc etc. Also how can u say its not important enough the whole idea of wikipedia is for people to come on here and find things out they didnt know before. If a paedophile that has been playing around with children isnt important enough then why is Michael Jackson or Gary Glitter on here. You owe it to the people of Surrey/London to keep this up for safety if nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarshaltonNews (talk • contribs) 16:57, 5 March 2007

I AM CHIEF BLIZZLE

hey, this is a school server so please dont block this address. i dont know who is vandalizing wikipedia here but im sure that whoever it is, has a very small penis. good day —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Negrodamuz (talk • contribs) 18:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A question.

I was wondering why you deleted my article on Aghast? I read the thing about notability, and mine followed more than 3 of them. Aghast are featured HEAVILY in Warning magazine and they've toward America more than once. I was wondering if you could tell me why you took it down.

Thanks,

xtheblademaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtheblademaster (talk • contribs) 23:23, 5 March 2007

Micheleo's not viable?

Hi there. SamGisu is actually a group of four college students working on an assignment to show the history of something in the area of our college. That was our first point. Second point: Micheleo's Pizza's article was very obviously about a restaurant and NOT a group of people, a band, or web content. The address was listed, as well as history on the establishment in question. There's many different wikis on restaurants, including Jimmy John's, McDonald's, Pizza Hut, Papa John's (pizza restaurants, who knew?), etc. Just wanted to let you know that you made a mistake. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samgisu (talk • contribs) 11:13, March 6, 2007

Brian the Stunt Bum

One of society's lesser known icons is Brian the Stunt Bum. For you to quick delete his page before his greatness can be spread like the seedlings of Adam throughout the land, is a hasty decision that you will regret until the ends of time.

I plea for you to look past yourself into obvious knowledge and restore faith in humanity.I for one will fight the good fight and allow the deciders to decide if the decision decided by you was decided correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Braveheart13 (talk • contribs) 11:57, March 6, 2007

Notability of films

Does a film only become notable if it is Star Trek then? Moron. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.23.24.158 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 6 March 2007

Deletion of Internaitonal Gaming Community

This article isn't about a group of people but it is about an organization. Halo 2 players would want to know about this community so that they may find a place to play that doesn't have racism and disrespect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indubididly (talk • contribs) 16:44, 7 March 2007

Wow...

You're really fast! I've been meaning for a while to post something thanking you for all the good work you do, but today I was finally inspired to do it... THANKS! :) At least twice today you've managed to delete a page I tagged for speedy and put a message up about it before I could get as far as posting the notice on the user's talk page, much to my astonishment. Anyway, just to save you the time, if you see one where I haven't done it, don't worry about it -- I'm undoubtedly in the process. :) Pinball22 17:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia Tech article deletion

I don't know what you were trying to delete under CSD R2, but you ended up deleting the actual Georgia Tech article. You must be more careful in your deletions in the future because something of an even higher magnitude could occur by careless mistakes. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 18:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of myGreenElectronics

myGreenElectronics is a public service in much the same way that any consumer oriented portal is concerned. I will edit the page to include no reference to the founding organization, but the portal itself is a not-for-profit public service that has recieved wide media attention. I will resubmit this page and I implore you to reconsider before a "speedy deletion". — Preceding unsigned comment added by CEA (talk • contribs) 19:08, 7 March 2007

Deletion of Simpleton (Oklahoma Band)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Simpleton (Oklahoma Band). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 74.195.229.184 19:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simpleton is a growing local music group based out of Central Oklahoma. Their notability has been established through several media articles from local newspapers, college newspapers, and local magazines.

Soloway Jewish Community Center

Seems like mine aren't the only pages you've deleted. Leave my Soloway Jewish Community Center page alone or I will start deleting your pages B'Shalom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eternalsleeper (talk • contribs) 03:31, 8 March 2007

TVO online

An editor has asked for a deletion review of TVO online. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 07tghard 03:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished..

the article you deleted was un finished.. well done.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plank92 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

explanations are good

A)why is this band page ok http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deerhunter

mine atleast looked "professional"

and

"My gut feeling is that the band is too new for notability. With no recordings noted and apparently playing only local dates, I just don't think they pass."

thats what another wikiadmin person said about deleting another bands page. thats all someone had to put, instead of deleting without a reason.

is this all you do all day —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chriswilson22 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenage Cancer Trust

Hi old friend. I wondered if you'd consider early closing this AfD for me. Cheers, --Dweller 21:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way someone's posted some offensive comments at the top of this page above the archiving and TOC. I'm reluctant to mess with someone else's user space or I'd give it a whack meself... --Dweller 21:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Team Lightening Page

I do not believe this should be deleted as it is about a charity Trampoline Club, and therefore people should be able to know about it. Other similar clubs/schools have pages so I do not understand why this one should be deleted. I added ciatations to the page to proove its credibility. Please reconsider and get it undeleted. Thanks x — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beefysteak (talk • contribs) 22:06, 8 March 2007

I included weblinks to show what the club is about. People may be interested in the club and want to know more about it, or infact its members may want to find out about the history of the club. I would appreciate it if u reconsidered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beefysteak (talk • contribs) 22:10, 8 March 2007

This may be so but my reasons are above. New members of the club may be interested in it's history, and as a information source wikipedia is where they would go to to find this information. At a later date, when i have more information on the history I will add this so it builds up and members can be further informed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beefysteak (talk • contribs) 22:16, 8 March 2007

Isn't the whole point of wikipedia to give information of what people want to know about? If people want to know about a big business like Alan Sugar's, they can find out about that. Or for a more connected example, a big football club they can. Why is it that small clubs should be excluded? I, and I'm sure others would be more interested in Team Lightening than Chelsea Football club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beefysteak (talk • contribs) 22:22, 8 March 2007

Ethnic-group lists deletion discussions

Hi, I noticed you participated in at least one of these three deletion discussions:

All three discussions have similar issues but are leaning in different directions, so you may want to participate in the others, if only for the sake of consistencey and to avoid accusations that Wikipedians are being unfair to some group or groups (which is something that concerns me). I'm asking everyone who participated in one discussion to participate in the others. I apologize for bothering you if you already have participated in the others. Best wishes, Noroton 04:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devin Tran

You deleted this page earlier today; the author has re-created it. I tagged it for speedy deletion; can you do whatever it is that prevents it from being created again? Thanks! --Proofreader J-Man 05:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Barrymore Halpenny

Can you take a look at this article Baron Barrymore Halpenny I believe it is suitable for speedy deletion being a promotional page with no notability [only his own sites come up in google] and it has the look of a spoof page?!

Deletion of FUNtastic!

Hi Some college friends of mine are in a great band for Children called FUNtastic! I'm trying to make a wikipedia article for them and it keeps getting deleted. The article is informative, detailing who is in the band etc, and I have even tried following the templates of other bands listed on Wikipedia. Why do you keep speedily deleting my article? Thankyou —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Osussat (talk • contribs) 17:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki. In response to your initial reply, addressing each of the issues in turn: RE Notability : A quick search of google would have revealed a press release from the book Publisher. Also, with due respect, how would you know of whether a UK Children's band was notably known or not? Are you in the market to be a potential consumer of such products? I believe that a search of the internet will reveal more articles like this. Afterall, they've sold 80,000 books in the UK, and have reviews on Amazon, iTunes etc. RE Bands in general and Wikipedia not being a promotional tool, I did not try and put any direct links to products etc, just explained who the band was, where you might know the members from, what they do, and put a link to their website for more information. Please feedback and let me know how I can post this article to your satisfaction.[[[User:Osussat|Osussat]] 17:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)]

Hi NawlinWiki. I am struggling to see how to resolve the first issue of notability (I assume that as you have not commented RE me using the article as a promotion tool that you have reconsidered that decision following my points?). Because this band is essentially a commercial product, me pointing to independent sources (who are going to be online bookshops with reviews, iTunes reviews etc), will you not deem this as self-promotion? Looking forward to resolving this. [[[User:Osussat|Osussat]] 17:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)]

NawlinWiki. In response to your last message comment of "It'll be a lot easier than me having to write it out verbatim in response to your questions." Who exactly will it be easier for? Not for me. If you are unable to take the time to justify why you have deleted my article, please kindly leave it alone. Please refer me to somebody else who is more willing to help me in successfully publishing my article. Thankyou {Osussat 17:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Brooke Photography

Well i couldn't find anything about Brooke photography for my art homework, and they are supposed to be quite influential in the photography world in the UK. So do you want to write the article? Because i don't believe that it should have been deleated. Please get back to me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ukuser (talk • contribs) 17:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

ADC Theatre

ADC Theatre was not begun in 1855; the group that performs there was. This article is just about the building. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 12:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case, then why not propose the article about the building and the group that performs there be merged into one? There is lots of good and overlapping information there that should be kept. Is tagging an endless amount of articles as requiring 'speedy deletion' the only way you see to improve things? There are ways to be constructive and positive in edits without sweeping in out of nowhere and passing instant judgement. Why you continue to behave this way on Wiki baffles me. --SpyMagician 15:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable usages of the phrase "I love you"

Hi NawlinWiki, I undeleted the article Notable usages of the phrase "I love you", which you speedy-deleted. I think you didn't realize that the user was in the process of factoring another article. I changed db to prod so this article doesn't fall through the cracks; merging back or AFD may be appropriate. There is a thread at WP:AN/I#Very-very-speedy deleting of an article; please let me know if you don't agree with what I did. Regards, —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-11 02:25Z

Andy Marsters

You have recently deleted a page about a radio DJ called Andy Marsters. Not only has this page been created by the listeners of the show that he presents, he has also done other things unrelated to the radio station he currently works at. Numerous reviews of his shows at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival were about to be linked to the page, and you will see that if you like at the 'Kingstown Radio' page on wiki, that he is listed as a current DJ for this station also. Surely if a person is looking at the 'Kingstown Radio' page, and would like some more information on a selected DJ, this source of information would be valuable.

The page also contained a history of Andy's shows on the radio, including a guide of each feature present. Is this not in-depth information?

Finally, Andy was starting to create a profile for himself on numerous forms of media, he appears on stage, radio and also is about to try and have a go at cracking television. I believe that Andy is starting to attract note, even if he is not notable now.

The listeners of Andy's show would really appreciate it if you reconsidered your decision to delete this page so quickly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.215.80 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 11 March 2007

Soldier Front

Do you have anything to do with Soldier Front and it's Wikipedia article?Henry8000 23:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Barrymore Halpenny - PROOF

I wonder if it’s jealous rivals that want his deletion from Wikipedia? If you want proof I can e-mail you some newspaper cuttings. Independent proof. Or why not e-mail the artist yourself! I have but unfortunately not had a reply yet, though you may be more fortunate. Have you tried? Goldburg 08:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Nike sponsored soccer teams

Why did you delete that page? I was not the only contributor to that page. I actually removed the list from super-cluttered Nike, Inc. page and put it on a separate page, and then you deleted it saying, I "was the only contributor". Undelete that page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tri400 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Alerting you to conversation

Please take note of the conversation at User_talk:Majorchaos. He's a newbie, very frustrated by his initial interactions. I'm hoping he'll become a productive contributor. Please do chime in, particularly in response to Bubba's spot-on interaction. --Dweller 16:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving my sandbox

It's been one of those Monday mornings. Usually I'm the user nominating articles for SD. Guess the joke's on me! Ronbo76 17:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

db-userreq...

Just a housekeeping note...I deleted the picture that was in that article just now. TTYL :-) --HappyCamper 17:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

Dear NawlinWiki,

I've written an article about keyword research which was deleted. Can you please look into this. It was not an experiment it was a serious thread.

Thanks, Yaniv.bl 18:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got your reply and I am sorry to say, your explanations do not relate to my article. It can't be spam because no one can benefit from it and it's original (I checked once more to be sure). Please reconsider your deletion and let me know why you thought it didn't deserve to be included in Wikipedia. Yaniv.bl 07:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Watkins

It has nothing to do with being notable. Perhaps remedial reading will work? THE ARTICLE IS PLAGIARIZED. There is a zero tolerance for that. STOP. Groanio 21:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have deleted this page. It was unquestionably copied from http://www.cielodrive.com/family/watkins/index.html. A few words here and there were changed, but it is without a doubt the same article. http://web.archive.org has had the cielodrive.com article since 2003, so it predates the Wikipedia article. --BigDT 22:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland, MS μSA

The Cleveland, MS μSA is the abbreviated form of the Cleveland, Mississippi Micropolitan Statistical Area. This abbreviated form is used primarily for redirected links in tables. See the Table of United States primary census statistical areas. μSA is pronounced mu-es-aye. You are welcome to type the entire name out in the long form. --Buaidh 21:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of redirects

As you can see from Table of United States Micropolitan Statistical Areas, you deleted a redirect that was not only not an unlikely name for the subject, it is even an official designation for Pottsville, PA μSA. {{db-nonsense}} is perhaps the most widely abused of the speedy deletion tags. It is frequently applied incorrectly. Always double-check that it really applies. Uncle G 21:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)kk ty[reply]

Talk:Broken ipod still active

The talkpage was not deleted. This is the second time this user has created this article. Recommend Protected Delete. Ronbo76 00:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artist Stub?

Should I create Baron Barrymore Halpenny as an Artists stub (trim the info down) to at least keep it active and useful for people looking him up on Wikipedia. Would this not be the best of both worlds and at least have an anchor for material in the future?

Goldburg 12:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting My Article

I was in the middle of uploading historical information about the Salem Witch Trials for the Witchcraze article page, when you deleted my article. I am new to Wikipedia and am learning how to do the formatting, so I am not as proficient or as quick as others. I guess others can create a whole page in less than an hour. I was uploading information that is historically based on my research of the Salem and European Witch Trials, with academic references and links to universities, the Library of Congress, and various museums dealing with the subject of the Witch Trials, including Arthur Miller's "The Crucible". Why don't you wait for someone to finish their Wikipedia page before you go deleting? --Witchcraze 18:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Gives?!

I was also in the middle of an article aria c jalali!, and you deleted it before I had time to add sources. I cannot fathom why though. I already had a couple sources and you claimed non notability. He has several albums released in stores, is absolutely HUGE in the san francisco music, and has 22,000 fans at the least, readily available to see! It is just absurd to me that I am trying to contribute information into this encyclopedia and you guys would delete it claiming nonnotability. thats like deleting arcade fire or someone. can I please have that page back the way it was so I don't have to completely begin from scratch? I wouldnt even know what to change about it if I began it again. Or at least can I have a more comprehensive explanation please? I stayed up until five AM working on that, as my first article, as I was listening to his vinyl record and you just came and deleted it. How can you justify 90% of the bands that appear on wikipedia and then delete this one? most of your musicians are gold selling artist. As a matter of fact, rarely are indie musicians gold selling artists. So by making SUCH INTENSE notoriaty to be the basis to justify being on wikipedia, then you are completely marginalizing the indie movement and taking their voice away. Now wiki users can only be exposed to corporate giants. It is so ridiculous. Please put my article back and tell me what needs to be changed instead of just deleting it. I even added a holdon tag and defended it. Scenehands 19:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay, I understand that you have given me the guidelines, but with my article still deleted, how am I to implement these guidelines and add the new sources/signifigance? thanks,

Scenehands 19:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My whole question is, can you give me back the original page's contents? If not by just putting it back up, then to me so i don't have to completely start over. also the exclamation point is part of the musical groups title. its like the band "adult." or the other band "!!! (chkchkchk)." If I took out the exclamation point, it would just be the musicians name rather than stage name / title under which his albums are released. If you look him up on itunes, or the internet, or in magazine, there is a ! that follows everytime.

finally, when trying to make this article, i used the page for rising_dissent as my template. I am curious to know what the rationale for keeping their page up and not the one I made is, considering they are basically the exact same page, with different pictures and group names, and when the musician I chose to write about has MUCH more fans, has toured EXTENSIVELY (I have seen him live twice in New York, and once in California), and has more albums. sorry for bugging you, but I had been up until five or so, when I woke up today to finally finish the sources in the article, everything was gone and lost and just put me in the worst mood. bleh. thanks again,

Scenehands 19:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ah! thank you so much. I will improve the article indeed. thank you again! Scenehands 19:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Incredibles 2

Why Did You Delete My "The Incredibles 2" new page?, I wanna Create my New Page and I Wanna Back. -DelarionDavis89 20:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In creating the 28thday page I used the existing Chilluminati page.

Since they are both regional collectives that exist for the same function, why is 28thday suitable for deletion when Chilluminati is not?

Great, you may as well delete everything else related to psytrance too, it is all far too unsubstantial for Wikipedia.

Thanks for the demotivation. I'll be sure to take without giving in the future.

ALBA Graduate Business School

Thanks for the move.--FocalPoint 02:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intopia

Hi, I believe you speedy deleted the article on Intopia against wikipedia policy, as this is neither a real person, group of people, band, club, company or web content (although it is proprietary to a company). I have restored the article, although as per your suggestion, I have added additional comments as to it's notability. If you still believe that this article should be deleted, please list it on articles for deletion to be debated. Baiter 03:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help please

Could you look at Alice Anderson in Contemporary artists. Now this seems like self promotion.

By the way I have done the Artist Stub on Baron Barrymore Halpenny, please check this out as well and see if it's okay. Freshacconci was even in favour of this and it allows others to expand. Hopefully have got there at last. Also pleased to see someone has expanded my Peter Brant stub.

Thank you for your help, it is appreciated.

Goldburg 13:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Irina Grabarnik

recently added self promotion page? Irina Grabarnik speedy delete? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.111.67.149 (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Happy Holiday! Happy Holiday!

This user would like to wish you a happy St. Patrick's Day.

Trampton 03:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G7 of Sage Day School

I could have sworn that I had edited Sage Day School (or was about to do so), which would negate the G7 qualification. Either way, could I request that you userify the article so that I can make my planned changes. Alansohn 06:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Barrymore Halpenny

This article Baron Barrymore Halpenny is nonsense/self promotion there is NO evidence for anything mentioned in it. A search of Google comes up with nothing about him apart from his own website. Delete? 88.109.2.74 08:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to delete as recreation after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Barrymore Halpenny but noticed your copyedit. A first check of the ISBN numbers drew a blank, but found one after. Agathoclea 12:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to Amazon.co.uk and type in Ghost Stations in the books, you will find them. Under Bruce Barrymore Halpenny, you find a list of some of his books and you will find Little Nellie 007. Buy a copy. Buy some of the Ghost Station Books. Goldburg 11:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my RobotFest page?

Q: Why did you delete my RobotFest page? A: "because it was a non-notable event" - strongly disagree - it is a Festival held in Maryland, which is a Category that many use to discover regional festivals to attend. This in itself is important. In addition, you may have noticed that I had just created the page within the hour and am still editing it. Also note it had the "Stub" marker, noting it as in progress. If I am off base please let me know I am new here, but don't delete it before I can finish it! Is there a way you can restore it? Thanks, --CarlosFlys 14:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Government Pages

I am disappointed with your overuse of power on Wikipedia. I am creating articles which describe an up-and-coming band in Westbrook, Connecticut. They have created an EP and are performing regularly. In Connecticut they are becoming well known. The information is absolutely relevant and I would appreciate a talk session regarding the pages before they are deleted. I will revert the pages to their edited form and expect a discussion on the matter. Thanks. Stripslashes 15:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that. I was probably a little more testy than I should have been. Also, I have this violent urge to press "delete" whenever the phrase "up-and-coming" is used. It's just a nice way to say "not at all notable". But you're right, the page moving was out of line (and very pointy). -- Merope 15:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see this. -- Merope 16:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

I wanted to tell you that 65.254.5.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) continues to vanalize Mendelevium. I was going to block this user, but I was not sure for how long and if it was even appropriate for me to do so. I thought the best thing to do would be to tell you, though I have also reported them to the administrators' intervention page. If you could get back to me about blocking, I'd be thankful. I just want to know if it's ok to block repeat offenders that have been warned multiple times.
Thank you, and have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 15:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

StripSlashes

Please see User_talk:Merope#Blocking, as my latest concerns are there. Ss2 16:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying very hard to follow all this. (My god, someone picked up on WikiLawyering real quick like.) When blocking StripSlashes, was there an autoblock? It doesn't look like it, so I'm not sure what he/she's talking about. -- Merope 16:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

StripSlashes

I agree to not edit the article until I have discussed it in the right forms and abided by the credability standards of Wikipedia.Ss2 16:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3lab

Why did you delete the 3LAB page? This is not an advertisement! It is clearly discussing the company background and uses the same language as all other cosmetic companies listings!! Your response is needed ASAP.

Air Secure (moved from user page)

Air Secure is not self promoting. They are a US corporation that is of high prominence in the Us aviation security industry the fact have only been listed. Along with the OWNER Rob Riddell, only his facts were listed. A speedy deletion is not required. If you want some verbage change please let me know aht you want changed?

Air Secure, Inc 19:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of Christian music videos

So what? You expect the creator to include a complete list of videos immediatley? --E tac 20:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at how this page looked when it was created, and look at the current article. I'd say it was incomplete when it was created and look at it now.--E tac 20:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, my article on Mitchell Oldschool Danger Bennett Mallory III (MODBM3) was deleted. I don't see what more I need to add to make it "reputable." Please inform Cheers, -Dave Ross —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Davidjohnross (talk • contribs) 00:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Talk:Scoutzknivez still active

Recommend protected delete as this user has re-created it two times. Ronbo76 03:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been misled - Kororinpa

You deleted Kororinpa: Marble Mania in place for a non-controversial move. This is however, not the case. It is true that I vandalized the redirect, however, beforehand User:TJ Spyke unilaterally moved the page to Kororinpa: Marble Mania and then vandalized the Kororinpa redirect. I had to get an admin to revert that said move, and then resorted to the vandals own measures to stop a move war (even my deleted edit summary at Kororinpa: Marble Mania will show this, and the deleted edits at Kororinpa will show the original vandalism, something which Spyke denies as ever). Although I regret joining him in his low brow tactics, I have moved the page back. - hahnch e n 10:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calling me the vandal? Haha, that is a laugh. Submit a move request if you want it at just Kororinpa. TJ Spyke 10:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not believe that breaking redirects with a seperate non-edit constitutes as vandalism, then that's your perogative. I'm afraid you'll find it's you who should be making the request. NawlinWiki, being an administrator has access to deleted edits, I'm sure that they will be able to make up their own mind, nonetheless. - hahnch e n 10:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Barrymore Halpenny is correct

I would really like your positive input on the Baron Barrymore Halpenny debate please. Laugh isn't it. Artists are trying to get on here and one that isn't they want to remove!

The following has been put on your page:

This article Baron Barrymore Halpenny is nonsense/self promotion there is NO evidence for anything mentioned in it. A search of Google comes up with nothing about him apart from his own website. Delete? 88.109.2.74 08:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I was about to delete as recreation after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron Barrymore Halpenny but noticed your copyedit. A first check of the ISBN numbers drew a blank, but found one after. Agathoclea 12:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I must make clear it is NOT a nonsense or self promotion and the books can be bought on Amazon.co.uk and older copies are on ebay. You have edited the article to make it conform, so I really don't know what the problem is? I also have some newspaper cuttings from the achieves, so I know the sources are correct.

Goldburg 10:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joxquiz

I confused as why you conclude that the page was nonsense when there was a reference to a published journal (The Galpin Society Journal) supporting it's usage as well as online sources and discussions. -- Ashley VH 16:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tahnks for your note but you really do not need to be so rude to me . i am very put down by you comment about my lovely article:-(- saddened (contact me)--Laeia Was Here 17:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well yeah i'm new to all this. but you have to understand my frustration. i'm just trying to have a giggle with myself, my mates and my gf by making it an official article. no worries tho

The Continuum

I don't think I adaquately understand the "notability" argument in the case of items such as films and videogames if the article I had for the continuum was worthy of deletion. Entries such as The Number 23 or Horse Isle RPG both contain essentially descriptions of what the item is, and a small amount of information about the item. The continuum page did exactly that. In fact, I would argue the continuum page was at least three times as notable as the Horse Isle page, and asserted equally as much significance as something like the dofus page. Llanwar 18:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, after reading the notability page, the primary criteria is independent, reliable sources writing non-trivially about the subject. I would argue that both the GameZone and GameDaily sources I referenced in the article are established sources of gaming news. Also, IGN has written an article about the company, furthering the amount of published information on the subject. Llanwar 18:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need to receive copies of deleted articles

I need to receive copies of deleted hoaxes (e.g. Jibbert Michart Macoy, Monk (Cartoon Network), etc.) from these users listed in the CheckUser, so I can add them to the latest bad jokes and other deleted nonsense page. Those hoaxes would really be useful there. Squirepants101 19:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

24 season six articles

I'm going to have to disagree - I think CSD takes priority over AFD consensus (or lack thereof). Plus, I {{db-empty}}ed them as, in my opinion, two nav boxes, one sentence, and a pitiful excuse for an infobox falls under A1. I have a few other reasons why they should be deleted, but I'll keep them to myself for this moment in time. Will ^{(Speak to Me/Breathe)}_{(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash)} 12:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jagwire

I'm sorry, but wasn't that article just a redirect page to Mac OS X v10.2 why would it be deleted? To tell the truth I don't really remember creating it, but if I did I'm sure it was only a redirect.TrevorLSciAct 16:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Saber girl08 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Saber girl08 04:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look ...

... at a note I left here. I believe I have had a prod request plus an unreferenced and an orphan tag removed without any change in the article content. Since I'm 100% certain about the orphan aspect, I am putting that back in now ... Thanks for your time! --Keesiewonder ^talk 11:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gangster Dolphin

I had started to add an article about the Gangster Dolphin Sound System, but you keep deleting it. I was adding the article as the sound system had been referenced on another article. Gangster Dolphin were a long running sound system in the 90's who gained many column inches, in both local and nation press and who featured in a number of documentries about the time. I wonder why you are so against this entry being included on the site.

MattBro 14:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Actors and Filmakers

Hey see my proposals at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Actor and Filmmakers and the main WP Film and Biography talk page. Know anybody who is interested? Actors and all film people articles need a body on wikipedia to upkeep them asthey need more focus -it would be a part of Biogrpahy and Film. If you are interested or know somebody who would be, please let them know and whether you think it is a good progession for the project or not. Please leave your views at the council or biogrpahy main talk page. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 14:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karazus Centuri

Speedy deletion for a band/group/googlefronk? HUH?! It's a game! BEING MADE!! FNAAAH LuGiADude 13:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it time to archive??? ;-) - CobaltBlueTony 17:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? LuGiADude 13:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ah, it doesn't work.

LuGiADude has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

But I hope you look at it upsidedown.FROWNNESS

Grape Vine Social Page

Hi there-can you clarify why this page is not allowed when pages like plentyoffish and mysinglefriend are allowed, as this page was modelled on these articles which have not been deleted. Please help. sparklinguk. Thanks for responding. Does the article on Urbansocial qualify because it has an external link to a press release?

Linguisticks

Hi there, thanks for contacting me to let me know why the article had been deleted. I hadn't finished creating the article. I left it as it was because I had to leave urgently to do something. Is there any way I can carry on from where I left off, or do I have to start again? Thanks Gibmetal77 19:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3LAB

Dear Editor:

Thank you for your feedback on the entry, "3LAB." However, would you clarify the reasons for speedy deletion? In comparing this entry to those for other commercially available skin care brands, the submission does not seem to be substantially different nor more promotional. Care was taken to ensure that subjective or promotional language was not used and that copy was limited to statement of fact. For example, the Olay entry states, "Olay's marketing was also unique." This is clearly a subjective and promotional assessment, yet this entry was accepted. The L'Occitane entry cites, "the core values of Sensorality, Authenticity and Respect are central to every aspect of L'Occitane." How is this less promotional than the cited statement that "3LAB products are formulated to provide multi-functional benefits such as anti-aging, hydration, etc." This is a statement of fact. The products are formulated to provide multiple benefits. Please clarify so that the entry can be edited to meet Wikipedia requirements. If the submission was deleted on the grounds that the brand must be notable, how is this evaluation made? Is it based on availability, sales, years in existence? This seems to be subjective. 3LAB is sold at Saks Fifth Avenue, therefore the brand is known and has been for several years. Thank you for your assistance.

Why'd you delete this page?

I made the page for the Mahwah High School Marching Thunderbirds and you deleted it. Using the fact that I was the only contributor is not valid, in my opinion, because nobody really knows about the subject anyway. Just for arguments sake, I was not even the one that started the page. The person who originally created it created it under the wrong title, so I moved it to the correct one. If you can, please put it back, or allow me to recreate the page. Edit: I forgot to login when I orginially posted this. My username is Superdude1112

user vandalised my UserPage

Sorry to disturb you. User talk:71.209.50.123 just vandalised my userpage, and I would appreciate if you could block them. Thanks. Ilikefood 16:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ilikefood 16:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LondonN

Can you please restore this template. It was in use until an editor wiped a number of articles and redirected them. I am now undoing this so the template is needed.--Osidge 18:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is Sweetwater not notable???

01:00, 17 March 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "Sweetwater Sound Inc." (a7 nonnotable company)

You deleted this page. Please explain in detail how Sweetwater qualifies as a7 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.246.135.90 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

My edits on The Pioneers

What is the reason that you cavalierly reverted my edits to this article?--Drboisclair 19:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from my talk page: I reverted this version, which looked like it had messed-up formatting. It looks like you've fixed that issue. Sorry to intrude. NawlinWiki 19:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, BTW I love "N'awlins" (New Orleans) and its Garden District and French Quarter. I have visted there twice, and I enjoyed it. That was before Katrina. There is still a problem with the large space in the "external links" section. I guess that when we fill in more text for this article that problem might take care of itself. Thank you for responding to my query.--Drboisclair 19:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the band Space Bee

Hello. I recently wrote a note on this band. I still don't know how to provide you with the source, so i'll try to show it here. About the band: www.thespacebee.com

About their participation in the Glastonbury Competition: http://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/information/index.asp?id=453

The short list for the John Peel Stage, of the Glastonbury Emergent Talent competition, is a selection of 15 bands among about 2000 participants. This might show the band has its relevance.

Eastern Front (WWII)/Rewrite

Why did you delete Eastern Front (WWII)/Rewrite? --Philip Baird Shearer 20:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kettle Moraine High School

stop deleting our stuff, we have to do it for a school project about how many students use wikipeida. we will stop changing things within a few weeks when we are done with our study. peace out nig! -ky

Just making sure you know this group is on AN/I as a death threat. He's been blocked at [1]. Philippe Beaudette 05:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

May you delete my page I want to start new, [2] cheers. Lakers 04:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Thank you for blocking the vandal User:Blogmister, it was indeed apparant that he was only being used for vandal. I placed the block tag on there and I guess you saw it and blocked him, thank you.

Your deletion of Ciarán Toner

Hi, I suppose you didn't really want to delete that page, so I restored it again. Please have a look. You may have failed to consult the page history. All the best, <K F> 13:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Upper St. Clair High School

Hey there, it seems to me that User:VeryParent and User:BilldWiki are sockpuppets of User:ScullyGreen. Are you an admin? If so, I think it's fair to say they're deserving of blocks. Their edit pattern is totally identical and one seems to pick up where the other leaves off. -- Chabuk ^{[ T • C ]} 16:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Great job on CSDs! The pages were deleted almost as fast as I clicked on "Save". ;) Keep up the good work! --El on ka 19:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

How is a wiki for IBM, 3M or Pottery Barn not commercial? I take it the answer is that their BIG?? I was only putting an image to better represent a wiki entry. Seems somewhat illogical to me but I guess like most information, once you make enough money to control media... you control media. I dig. When is google buying this thing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tortillaface (talk • contribs) 20:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry I didn't sign... Told you I was new.Tortillaface 20:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I do appreciate the response :) You must mean notability like Grynner? Maybe on some planet.

PS. I was not insinuating you were being paid, just that cash = notability, unless you have an admin buddy (see above). select comfort mattresses with a hyperlink! (type select comfort into search box).Interesting logic. Have fun. Tortillaface 16:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.jpg

Hi. There's nothing wrong with the image itself, but it is hosted on Commons. I was just tagging the corresponding empty enwiki image page for deletion, hence the {{db-noimage}} tag. Not a big deal really but... --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's CSD I2. "This is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image." Same goes for Image:US states by date of statehood.gif. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cost of ruling

I am a newbie, granted, by why delete "the cost of ruling"? I have in academic quarterlys seen the phenomenom refered. and I provided a link to a working paper, which provides additional sources. Just curious... Achristoffersen 21:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shnoigal

We Know what you are up to Astrolloger. We've fought you, and your Astrollobeans, you know who IAIN LAKE. Me and Cominoverdahill2(user:cominoverdahill2)are looking forward to defeating you Astrolloger, and I'm sure Shnoigal and the rest of his Army are too!!!!!!!!!!!!Waltonbrongle 15:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Image_talk:Robert_Post.jpg is not a G8 because it "contains deletion discussion that is not logged elsewhere." Hbdragon88 07:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pallywood cover.jpg

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Image:Pallywood cover.jpg. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your hastey deletion of the image just as I was adding it to the Pallywood article (about 8 minutes(!)^[3] after it was initially uploaded) was not a proper move, I suggest in the future that you inspect the time the image was uploaded before you delete it for not having any links.

Now I'm supposed to re-write all the image information because of your poor judgement (low level vandalism). Jaakobou 12:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Things can be un-deleted here at Wikipedia, the way they were when they were deleted. Perhaps if you phrased that a little nicer, NawlinWiki would be more likely to look into un-deleting it. Calling it vandalism though, is not appropriate. Leebo ^T/C 12:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, i did not know it could be restored and allready sat on re-writing the info, i'm sure you can understand how it feels to insert an image and when you add it to an article it's allready deleted. anyways, image was promptly restored and i'm more than willing to remove the un-delete2 tag if you wish me to. Jaakobou 13:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is ASPISBRILLIANT

This is ASPISBRILLIANT calling to let you know that you are an idiot. Give me my ability to edit back now or I will take severe action. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ASPISBRILLIANT2 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

How to make a non-speedy delete entry?

I am a newbie here and I saw an entry from another company I was involved in so I thought it would be ok to put one up about my current company since it has quite a bit of useful info for allergy sufferrers. The next thing I know it was deleted before I could even add useful info to it.

What kind of stuff makes this any different from other companies that are listed here. I tried to start it off neutral, but even that seemed bad. Any help would be appreciated.

Does a company stub make the difference?

Davetan 14:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, excuse you.

Why, sir did you delete an article that I spent ONE HOUR OF MY PRECIOUS TIME CREATING??? I PUT THE HANG ON TAG ON THERE FOR A REASON!!! I WAS STILL EDITING. THIS IS NOT A VERY KIND THING TO DO AS I AM NOW EXTREMELEY AGITATED AND ANGRY AT YOU. Please try to be a little nicer. Get back to me on this IMMEDIATLEY. Your impolite antics are making me quite mad. I want to create this article for an artist, who would LIKE to be SHOWN TO THE GREATER BODY OF PEOPLE! DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND, MR. NWLIN? Please, make me change my feelings about you. I don't care how many barnstars of dillegence you have gotten, but you are extremley harsh. I am your father. 15:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No "Confidence in Reason"?

Hello. Concerning your speedy deletion of my article Confidence in reason,

I am fairly new as a contributor to Wiki, so perhaps I did not annotate the fact that I (meaning the Foundation I represent) ARE the content holders for the content I posted. I am the webmaster of the site you reference. I state this fact on my user page. Perhaps RATHER THAN using speedy deletion you could have perhaps ... contacted me or flagged the page for comment. I have posted the email regarding ownership of copyright to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org.

Since you were so helpful in speedily deleting this page perhaps you could assist me in how to UNDO your speedy delete.

DanBlanchard 16:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update and info on the procedures on this. Much appreciated. DanBlanchard 19:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

50,000+ external pages and still not "notable"

Thanks for for quick reply as to why my entry was deleted.

Just want to say that maybe you might consider being a little slower to pull the trigger in general. I mean my submission was deleted before I even had time to edit and add "notable" info references.

Part of the reason I even spent time submitting is that with a quick search on Google the company shows up over 50,000 times on other sites. About 5,000 are internal pages ie. on the company site.

No doubt many of them are advertising or affiliate type links. This makes it hard to find the non-commercial information. Articles etc. which I thought would work better on Wikipedia. Guess I was wrong. Well live and learn ... I'll head elsewhere where my time is better spent.

Davetan 16:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resurrection of dead race horse

User:Secondontheroad has just recreated the dead race horse article, again. I posted this "editor" as a sockpuppet of User:runningcupcake03, but nobody has said or done anything since I did so. --Orange Mike 19:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for speedy action. --Orange Mike 19:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the article be salted, in case another sockpuppet appears? --Finngall ^talk 19:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salt, perhaps?

(I figured I'd just tell you about this, since you're here right now.) The page Heather whalen should probably be salted -- check out the deletion log: [4]. Pinball22 20:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aldon

Hi Nawlin Wiki, Thank you for your message left on my talk page explaining why you deleted my article on Aldon from Wikipedia. I am truly puzzled, however. I tried to model my article on other similar articles such as

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKS_Inc.

The MKS article and many others like it seem to be accepted by editors, and I don't quite understand the distinction. It would be a great help to me if you could explain to me the difference. In the mean time, I will continue to try to make the article on Aldon encyclopedic because I feel it is an important contribution to Wikipedia. Every day people turn to Wikipedia for information on ... much that is under the sun, including companies.

Aldon is a noteworthy company because, founded 25 years ago, it was one of the first organizations to try to make software development into a process and the first to develop tools to assist developers with creating high quality software. Aldon brought the concept of total quality management previously used in automaking to software, and that contribution has made a significant difference to the role of the developer and the quality of software today.

Any light you can shed will help me greatly. Thank you.

Urchin22 17:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobus Koomen

Hi Nawlin, I was wondering, why did you delete my article about Jacobus Koomen? please answer me. ... added at 01:56, 30 March 2007 by User:Callmemrshowoff (contributions)

Autosodomy

This article, which you recently deleted, has been recreated. I have submitted it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autosodomy

--Tony Sidaway 19:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JavaChecker

Why JavaChecker was deleted ? This is tool for Java source code analysis, references from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis. Analogical pages exists for other tools, such as FindBugs or PMD. Also exists cited publications about one. So, please tell me: why article for JavaChecker was deleted (?) I think that this is error and it must be recreated. Are exists some formal procedure of conflict informing ? If yes, and you think that this article still must be deleted, please, start one.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rssh (talk • contribs) 23:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Let's All Sing Like the Birdies Sing

I posted the lyrics for this portion of Walt Disney's Enchanted Tiki Room just as the lyrics for the Hawaiian War Chant are on that page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaiian_War_Chant), yet mine were deleted. Why? You seem to delete a lot of things. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tericson (talk • contribs) 00:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]