User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 84

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

The entry I made for The Loco-Motion by little eva is the correct title for the Dimension albm release aas cited by http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/little_eva/llllloco_motion/

Chyezzy2 (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tlaw123 and i wasn't doing any of the stuff u said i was that you very much and my proof is that Katy McBain the oringinal person who helped me make that page on her while we were high out of our mind so I don't need your incorrect comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlaw123 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ampitup Hi - I'm not sure if this is the right or best way to contact you, because, yes - I am a new user. I had started out in the Sandbox , then felt the article was well-developed enough to post. I did not question the validity of the topic. I am a graduate student and as I had found several references to it online and see that this is a rapidly growing field. I do not know the author of the book "Neurobranding," and thought I been careful not to make it all centered kn that as well, since it is a much broader subject. Thank you so much for your comments. Is there anything I can do to salvage this. I did do a lot of reserach and have cite a lot of credible sources... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ampitup (talk • contribs) 22:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

abuseFilter 260, common vandal phrases, currently blocking me

Hello NawlinWiki, you tweaked a problem I was having with #58 back on Nov 11th, and now I'm having a problem with sending my important official information to Gerda.

Okay, it is actually a secret mission, I probably should not be telling you this, but see User:Grey_Knight/Wikipedia_Fun_Police and my handler can explain everything.

As you can probably guess, this one particular satirical jab as overly-officious wikiJustice is not crucial to the survival of wikipedia.

As you can probably also guess, the recent uptick in aggressive AbuseFilter behavior, is well into WP:BITE territory by now, methinks.

Am I just wrong on the merits here? If so, can you explain specifically why, please? 74.192.84.101 (talk) 00:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 14:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Account block

I see you blocked user Trollinyomom for vandalism. Another user made a nearly identical edit on the same article last week (see here: [1]). That user, Ncain19 (talk) should probably also be blocked.Goodsdrew (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bayan Towfiq and Flowroute

In User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_80 you write "both the Towfiq and Flowroute articles were being edited by sockpuppets of a sockmaster who appears to be running a pay-for-articles group." Were you referring to the Morning277 SPI? —rybec 20:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see deleted material, but there's a note at Jjeffmackay's talk page crediting Jjeffmackay with starting the Bayan Towfiq article, before you deleted it. Jjeffmackay has made a new Flowroute article to replace the one you deleted. Perhaps Flowroute would qualify for CSD G5? —rybec 23:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic IP

While I really appreciate the counter vandalism you are doing, I myself, a Wiki user id: Debastein just wanted to give you a heads up that this i.p. seems to be a dynamic i.p. address. I make this reference to your quite polite reversion warning to edit revision on the talk page of this i.p. While I have not done as such and will never do counter productive editing, getting a message for the same means that this probably wasn't from my laptop or my dongle, rather this is a dynamic ip provided by my network. I don't recall if there was a list to put it dynamic ip's for easy reference, but just thought I'd give you a heads up. Thank you by the way, firstly for keeping Wiki free of Vandalism, and secondly, for such a polite temple instead of the harsher ones. Regards, Debastein. Currently writing from ip: --14.96.200.118 (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tsukineko

As you reverted some vandalism on it, I'm letting you know that it's now at WP:Articles for deletion/Tsukineko as as suspected hoax. Peridon (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HD (rapper)

I'm writing to figure out why my page was just deleted. I read your description, and understand now that I had to many outgoing links. This is a nationally-known rapper that deserves a wikipedia page. BearfacedENT (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)BearfacedENT[reply]

You would need to show that this person meets our notability standards for musicians, see WP:MUSIC, by citing to reliable *independent* sources, see WP:V (in other words, sources that are not HD's own pages). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Went ahead and clarified any outstanding circumstances the best that I could, let me know if I can do anything else. Thanks BearfacedENT (talk) 09:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Bearfaced ENT[reply]

Doctor Who: Dalek Invasion

Hi, Because of long-term abuse, please reblock Doctor Who: Dalek Invasion with email access disabled. Thanks! Thewikiguru1 (talk) 18:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toxkäpp!

hi i'm new here and i just wanted to create a page about the band TOXKÄPP! but apperently they all get deleted immediately! Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toxkäpp! (talk • contribs) 15:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two reasons: (1) the article was promotional, rather than neutral - see WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. (2) the article did not show, by citation to reliable independent sources (WP:V), how this band met our notability standards, WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sahil Jain

Sahil Jain was recreated for the fifth time in 3 days the moment you deleted it! Warned editor again about creating autobiograpies. :-o 220 of ^Borg 16:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ashkenazi Jews

Isn't 4 months a little long? Debresser (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was 3 months, but I will change it to 1 month. This is a very persistent long-term vandal. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. :) But still. Thanks for the reduction. We'll just have to deal with this guy. This article is well-watched, after all. Debresser (talk) 19:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KrzysztofRogoza

I saw you deleted the page "ComTechnique". I understood that purpose of that was promotional approach used within article. If I change it to more historical background, could you restore it? How I can gain back the text?

I've moved the text of the deleted article to your userspace at User:KrzysztofRogoza/ComTechnique. In order for the article to be acceptable, (1) all the promotional language needs to be removed, see WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM; (2) you need to find reliable independent sources (see WP:V) that show that this company is notable per our standards, WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible review schedule

Hello User:NawlinWiki; My interest is in initiating or starting a review for a GA or FA wikipage for a medical article. Any possible interest in participating? BillMoyers (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]