Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 28

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_____________________________________

From: "Coping With the Adolescent Psychopath", here:

"He honestly does not believe rules of any kind apply to him. He sees any attempt to place limitations on his behavior as a challenge to prove he cannot be controlled. He has no real emotions (doesn't even grasp the concept) and seems to truly not comprehend there is a problem. As long as no one crosses him or requires anything from him he is charming, witty and pleasant. Otherwise he is either acting like we are the problem children he must tolerate or he becomes angry and verbally aggressive."

Remind anyone of anyone? --NW


Why was the article on Gregg Braden removed ?

NawlinWiki ... i apologize if i may not follow the rules here correctly... i am a big fan of WikiPedia and of you guys who look after the quality. in this case - Gregg Braden page - i came up with a small description about this guy by myself and added several book- and other links. the person Gregg Braden himself for sure deserves a page. so i am quite curious why the system removed the page... thanks ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triadic2000 (talkcontribs) 17:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gregg is a well known speaker and author ... please see www.GreggBraden.com ... thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triadic2000 (talkcontribs) 04:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Why you delete David Lazzaroni... per A1

Why do you delete my article about David Lazzaroni. It was three lines written and he has been on top 15 in world cup at least 10 times and is because of that notable. So why you deleted it? AlwaysOnion (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! AlwaysOnion (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why you deleted The Judas Syndrome??

the band member Phil Vibes of Irate has an international fanbase having played all the major festivals in the european summer tour circuit. Additionally the other members of the group were in bands that lapped around the USA a number of times with dedicated fanbases nation-wide as is evident by the combined almost quater million hits to their myspace pages.

in short, people are interested in what happened to these people.

so can you give the page back and let me finish it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred Edmund (talkcontribs) 00:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Why you delete The iphone unlock history ??

Codegear (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


ok i read that. but you can remove the ads like text from it instead of removing the entire page! Not all edits on this page are done by me! Codegear (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GroupSwim Deletion

Greetings - I saw that you deleted the GroupSwim entry I submitted/created because it was advertising. My company, a publicly traded investment firm, is piloting GroupSwim and it shows a lot of promise. GroupSwim has a unique and effective approach to helping us gauge client sentiment. Note that GroupSwim was my second Wikipedia post. My first post, Balsamiq, was also deleted because it lacked "significance" (Balsamiq is a groundbreaking tool for allowing non-technical users easily create mockups). How do you evaluate advertising versus significance? I also see posts on other software applications (e.g. Apple Mail) so is significance based on widespread adoption or something genuinely unique? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkingbking (talkcontribs) 02:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hagger articles landing on my watchlist

NawlinWiki, a while ago I asked you how various Hagger vandalism articles could have ended up on my watchlist, and as you remember, you didn't know how, but asked me to tell you if I found out. Well, a little while ago I figured out how the articles got there, and the explanation is actually rather simple: those articles got there because articles already on my watchlist were being moved by Grawp and then those new article titles remained on my watchlist after it happened, because when an article that's on your watchlist gets moved, the new title is added to the list, and remains even if it's deleted. Far simpler then I had suspected at the time.--LWF (talk) 04:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pederasty

I think it is uncalled for to block the article for a month. No one is warring over it, and we may have to do some work on it in the near future. Haiduc (talk) 03:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the above article? I see you have restored it now. But why did you delete in the first place?↔NMajdantalk 19:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Selective deletion. –xeno (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For protecting LGBT pages from vandalism and defamation by anonymous users and single-purpose-account vandals. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you'd deleted this page citing vandalism, and restored it soon after. I checked the page and could see no sign of recent vandalism, though an IP had posted an extensive list of Prince's songs which another editor removed. I'm keeping an eye on this page and the article associated with it and I'm curious what you saw that flagged the vandalism deletion. I am assuming that the complete deletion was an error. Thanks 23skidoo (talk) 22:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please disregard the above. I didn't realize you were dealing with a vandalism page move. Good work on fixing that. Cheers! 23skidoo (talk)

Why was the Offspring page protected? There wasn't much vandalism lately before you protected it, so I assume it's probably safe to unprotect it now. Alex (talk) 03:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

A legitimate request to rename an article (H.R. 1424) that you protected has been made on its talk page. The bill was signed into law as Public Law 110-343. (source)   — C M B J   10:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring this! -- Philcha (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection

Why did you move protect Power Rangers: Mystic Force?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm wondering what the heck is going on, I noticed you had done the same for Sonic the Hedgehog (character). You've move-protected quite a lot of pages in the last few minutes. What's up? NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 21:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And now orkut... I see your point, but I'd also like to note the incongruity between preventive move-protection and the available move-protection templates, which give only two reasons for the protection: naming disputes or vandalism. If this practice of preventive move-protection is acceptable (and the community may indeed be shifting towards this direction), perhaps this ought to be brought up, and adjustments made.
You may reply here; I am watching the page. Waltham, The Duke of 16:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Same response -- for pages where there's no real possibility that the title will legitimately need to be changed, and which have a high edit count such that they are highly visible/viewed pages, and where vandal edit summaries can't easily be removed, it seems prudent to me to protect the page. Note that "high visibility page" is now one of the check-box reasons that can be used for page protection. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is all very well. Having established that protection of this type is indeed an acceptable practice, I am asking whether you agree that the protection-template system should be updated to cover this option. If you do, I could initiate discussion on the matter in an appropriate venue. If not, we could continue here for a little more. Waltham, The Duke of 20:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please unprotect Kid Koala for anon editing. Thanks. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dwayne Johnson protection

Hey there! I believe you only meant to add move protection, right? :) Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thought so. Keep up the good work :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Bopped Kia going to be banned? --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to restore this page? Can I help in any way? GlassCobra 20:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good article that should be restored, but I'm not sure which material needed to be deleted so I won't touch it for the time being. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's fixed now (clear your cache if you're not seeing it). NawlinWiki (talk) 21:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For taking care of Pibo. It's been a while since they were around. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 08:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete this page? There has been no discussion about this that I'm aware of. The Prince (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. The Prince (talk) 12:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Chem Genre

Please can you edit the info box so the genre shows again, i dont know to do it...also please read the discussion 'Emo is Crap' on their discussion page, as I think it is convincing....Thanks!User:Hardocore Punk Rocker (talk) 13:26, 11 October 2008

Restore Irish E-Sports page

Based Jerry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) prior decision that this page can not be put up for speedy deletion and SoWhy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) agreement with Jerry's decision your deletion of the Irish E-Sports page was reverted. It had already been noted on the talk page at the time of your speedy deletion of the page by Jerry (talk · contribs) the the page was a marginal case and that it couldn't be put it for speedy deletion.

In order for the page to be complaint with GFDL, all other versions need to be restored. PolarIce (talk) 18:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalsocialist or Nazi

You wanna do scientific work or propaganda? --Cretino (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Rosenbaum: Explicar a Hitler : La búsqueda de los orígenes de su maldad, Siglo XXI Editores (Mexiko), 1999, Seite 179. «A veces se attribuye a Heiden el haber popularizado la palabra 'nazi'. En sus primeros tiempos, los Nacional-socialistas eran conocidos por la abreviatura convencional 'naso', hasta que Heiden, según se dice, empezó a usar en sus artículos 'nazi', que en la jerga popular de Baviera significaba 'bobo' o 'simple' ...» --Cretino (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So it's time to make use of the correct term and tell the people. Being wrong in a crowd does not make things right. --Cretino (talk) 21:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why Did You Delete the Page on Kida K.Z?

Hiroki-Nakadoi (talk) 04:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

size2shoes deletion

Why did you delete size2shoes. After you posted the speedy deletion notice I posted a halt notice and the reason why it should not be deleted in the article's talk page and you deleted it anyway without reply. It's either recklessness of laziness. Please restore the page and review my note on the size2shoes talk page.--Theosony (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yazidi

Hiya, I noticed that Yazidi has been semi-protected since mid-August... Is it okay with you if I lift the protection? I think things have stabilized. Thanks, --Elonka 18:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remember or track down what happened at this time? [1]. Did a third AfD go through? AfDs on several related articles were skewed by socks of User:Ekajati. Sticky Parkin 20:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, people make an AfD notification instead of just deleting a new article out of hand. I created the article to resolve a redlink. - Denimadept (talk) 01:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki! I was following instructions on my User_talk:Freshmenz page in my last actions. I am not sure why you threaten me again. I really don't feel that my edits are disruptive - Can you provide constructive criticm? I have spent several hours of my time to write each articles. Thanks, I appreiciate your help. What do you suggest for this article? How can I make it more important? I was communicating with Thingg, first, if you wish to read my communications. User_talk:Thingg I would hope that you respect my freedom of speech and openness to communication.

Take good care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshmenz (talkcontribs) 16:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki. You are false on your "PR firm" claim and I would ask do you the same questions... do you work for Mayor Ray Nagin or the City of New Orleans or Ice Records? I am not sure why you make it personal with my postings and attack me like that. I do think that my CigarFox article provides notable information from third party listings (besides one PR listing that was picked up by Army Vet.) I guess that I will give up my effort to complete this list List_of_companies_based_in_Michigan and I will stop in fear of having my freedom of speech shut down on Wikipedia. Unless, we can work together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshmenz (talkcontribs) 16:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One other question is JR_Cigars a notable company? It is the same as CigarFox in my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshmenz (talkcontribs) 17:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know userspace is more lenient than mainspace, but this page seems a bit inappropriate to me. I haven't been around here for long, so I was just looking to see what a more experienced user thought of it. FWIW, the user's edits have been vandalism only.--Terrillja (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sock block evidence

Could you please post the evidence for your block of Up the cross (talk · contribs) to their talk page or user page? They have requested unblock, and there is no way to evaluate the request. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 23:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of User:ßitch

Could you please delete User:ßitch's account (ie. delete him from the index, all user pages, talk pages, their subpages, history, etc., and all traces of him, and also, delete his login name and password so that Wikipedia cannot be logged in with that account)? His owner doesn't need it anymore. - Æåm Fætsøn (talk) 07:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Usernames *cannot* be deleted both for technical and legal reasons (GFDL). The best that can be done is that he can be renamed. -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 07:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TRASH and The Gong Show

Thanks for deleting my page. Also I'd like to thank other Wiki users for leaving degrading comments about my band on The Gong Show page. While I did not make the initial entry on The Gong Show page, I merely corrected the degrading commentary and included the name of our act. Its amazing that Comedy Central found us worthy of being the opening act on their premiere episode yet wiki users didn't think our name or band was worth mentioning. Amazing still is the sheer volume of non-noteworthy bands included on this site. Also thanks to everyone who called me a blatant self-promoter when I just was correcting the entry. Whatever, we have plenty of people who feel we are noteworthy and frankly if I want to self promote, wiki aint the place I'd choose to do it. Trashrocks (talk) 18:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Lutterworth

I am failing to understand why this page has been deleted for lack of notability as Lutterworth's own radio station is referred to in the external links of the wiki article on the town of Lutterworth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutterworth#External_links). Furthermore the template used for content was based on a similar set up in Market Harborough (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harborough_FM), which does not have the local history of the pioneer of Radio Lutterworth. It would be appreciated if you could reinstate the page or provide some guidance as to what is to be added to meet the notability criteria. Whilst it may not be much of a big deal for you, there are people who will value a short article on the brief history of this radio station - it would be much appreciated if you could reinstate the article. Many thanks. Soundrediscovery (talkcontribs) 19:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Page move

I notice you are online. Please could you move Leicester Lions (speedway) over Leicester Lions redirect. It was moved unneccessarily in March and left many links to the speedway pointing at DAB. DAB to the other article is on speedway page. Thanks Waterden (talk) 21:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The orginal article was there but then it was moved to make a DAB page which isn't really needed with just the two articles. Just when you get five minutes. Thanks. Is it me are there a lot of attack pages today on new pages patrol ! Waterden (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section length, Book titles, et al.

Hi. Can you read this section and then offer your opinion on the points raised, specifically the issue of titles in the FCB, length and detail of given sections, what constitutes “fannishness”, etc.? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion review for Warren conrad

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Warren conrad. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. UsaSatsui (talk) 14:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Pen Is a Detonator

There is an album page of Ruet Caelumtoo My Pen Is a Detonator. I'm not sure if that can be speedily deleted considering the status of the artist article. --Clubmarx (talk) 01:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to remove the A7 from that article. I felt that "Editor of the Times of Pakistan" was an assertion of notability. It did need sources though. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I blanked the page in an attempt to remove the redirect which I thought was causing problems with moving the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority page using the move wizard. Everything however has been moved over now. Allan kuan1992 (talk) 03:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tan has offered to oversight this user if we unblock - are you happy for me to trial this by allowing an unblock on this occasion?--VS talk 10:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N'awlinWiki's mutt

Thought you should know about this user... Special:Contributions/N'awlinWiki's_mutt --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection unset

Not sure why the protection was unset on User:NawlinWiki/Barnstars, but I reset it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I forgot about the related talk page. I fixed that, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another sock nest

It's user:Ron liebman. I blocked the IP and a few socks. There was one user in the lot, Brianna Goldberg (talk · contribs), who I was unsure about, so you might want to ask Wknight or someone else who's familiar with Ron's modus operandi. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mind protecting? GrszReview! 05:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've got an unblock request

...from this IP. It looks like it belongs to a school, and you blocked it for the rest of the school year due to vandalism. The current note claims to be from a teacher who would like account creation enabled to let a few students do projects. This came up as a helpme request; I'm just passing the message on. Take care. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Jac16888 went ahead and did it. I was EC'd on the message, so he didn't know I all ready had left you a note. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User talk:Sergey.Lesnikov, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User talk:Sergey.Lesnikov is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:Sergey.Lesnikov, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sock block request

You recently blocked a Swamilive sock, so I assume you know the history. There's an unblocked probable sock at User:Felicity Carpool who made this edit, later repeated by User:72.35.4.220, a known Swamilive IP. The IP is not currently blocked (although I don't know why not). Can you please take a look? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for deleting this. I'm not sure why I'm getting so much grief lately. I've even been "outed" on the Internet by some person or group calling itself "Wikipedia Watch", without any explanation of my "sins". Bearian (talk) 20:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to turn off all bots!

Please turn off MifterBot because this bot is bothering me! GreyMatterEchoUKfan (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Jelly Jon article

Is it ok if I put my Jelly Jon article of myself back up. I'm just poking fun at myself and I would really appreciate it if I could put it back up. It took a very long time to type and I managed to save it before you deleted it. Please consider it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelly Jon (talkcontribs) 22:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title blacklist

You need to change the title blacklist again Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 08:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi
Could you unprotect {{Db-bio-notice}} again? It was vandalized only once, and I'd like to adjust the language there to match A7 and the new {{db-album-notice}} (i.e.this edit). You can do it yourself, too, or I can work with {{editprotected}}, but the notices don't really seem like high-risk templates, not even highly-visible ones since they always get substituted.
Cheers, AmaltheaTalk 12:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --AmaltheaTalk 20:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my article was deletd

i need to have my text back from the article you deleted. that article was under construction but i did not know how to say it Kittycat0143 (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the {{underconstruction}} template to show that it is under construction, however it is better practice to edit it in your userspace, then copy it to the mainspace. Even when an article has the underconstruction template up, it still may be deleted. --Terrillja (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing this page and made an editing error which accidently blanked the page. Before I could react, it was deleted. Could you please restore it so I may continue work on it, thanks. MrHarper (talk) 01:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'd like to make a change to {{NBA player statistics legend}} because it should be slightly different from {{NBA roster statistics legend}}. A user added "Career high" to the latter template but the roster stats are never bold, so the legend may mislead readers into thinking that no players on a particular roster achieved career-highs in a particular year. Please change the redirect to match this revision. Thank you. —LOL T/C 16:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up and a question

Just letting you know that Andrew Blake (pornographer) has been restored. It's back at RFD. The logs say it was deleted, then deleted again, then recreated. How does that work? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 05:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind the question, I figured it out. It was deleted, recreated by a Swamilive sockpuppet, deleted again, and then all of the history restored. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 05:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Real Christian Singles

Hi, I just wanted to know why the page Real Christian Singles was deleted. And why pages like Plenty of Fish and Match.com are allowed to be up. It doesn't make sense and seems like discrimination. I mean, the website was featured on E-True Hollywood Story and the Give and Take Radio Show. User:leesw

Hi NawlinWiki. You declined the speedy request on the Real Christian Singles article stating the founder was notable [2]. As I read the article the founder is Lee Wilson he merely worked once at an organization founded by Joe Beam. Doesn't seem to have any actual claim to importance in the article. Not that declining the speedy isn't well within your right anyway I just thought I'd point out what appeared to be a misreading. In the meantime I've placed a notability tag on the article in the hope we might see some more appropriate references. -- SiobhanHansa 21:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As Lee Wilson myself, I can say that I may not have a Wiki page, but I co-authored a book with Joe Beam that is a best seller (called The Real Heaven). Plus Real Christian Singles is a massive site, at least one of the top five Christian dating website in existence. It's as notable and important as most of the other dating sites I've seen on here. User:Leesw

"Fragile Porcelain Mice" article

Please explain the reasoning for deleting this article. "Band vanity" was cited as cause, but the article was just a history of the band. The original article, in fact, was probably more self-deprecating than anything and was in no way blatant advertising--again, just a history of the two-decade-old band. Fpmwebmaster (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phoebe Price's article deleted?

She OBVIOUSLY a real person, she's a very famous actress/model. Google her to see! Put the article back! Tigermilked (talk) 12:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smart Parking

Hi! I'm planning on starting the Smart Parking page and I noticed that it was deleted in Sept for advertising. I was wondering if you remember why it was deleted as such - I'm trying to avoid COI type issues while making the page, and I figured it'd be a good idea to check. Firemaster67 (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, that is actually very useful, thank-you for the quick and highly specific response! Firemaster67 (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a reason for such a swift deletion of my article, before I even had a chance to explain myself. After reading WP:MUSIC, I can say that this particular band completes criteria 1, 2, 7, 11 and 12. I know the article was no more than a stub, but I just started working on it, plus I have referenced almost everything I had written in the article. So please put it back. Sideshow Bob 19:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Timothy alborn

Was a complete and utter hoax thanks for th speedy SatuSuro 02:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alana Zimmer

YOU DELETED THE ALANA ZIMMER PAGE. I WAS GOING to put a reference but didnt noe how to, it was going 2 link to the fashionmodeldirectory.com alana zimmer page but you deleted it b4 i could, so google her and you will see that she is very famous Canadian model. Wandera4evaluv (talk) 02:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)User:Wandera4evaluv[reply]

Deleted page request

Hey Nawlin, would you be so kind to copy the deleted contents of Template:Belize to my sandbox. I would really appreciate it. Grsz11 →Review! 02:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was kinda disappointing, ha. Oh well. Grsz11 →Review! 02:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]