User talk:Triadic2000

Triple Store

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Triple Store, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://rhetoricaldevice.com/TripleStore.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gregg Braden has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BIO and WP:V. The author's own site is not a reliable independent source. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ulrike Reinhard

I have nominated Ulrike Reinhard, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrike Reinhard. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. This is a collective warning for the articles created. This is a low level warning and will help guide you in creating more appropriate pages. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ulrike Reinhard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulrike Reinhard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrike Reinhard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]