User talk:Navidarian

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Navidarian! Your additions to The Kabul Times have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 18:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not remove the {{copyvio-revdel}} template from articles, as you did with The Kabul Times. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:The Kabul Times/Temp. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates will be blocked from editing. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 19:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The Kabul Times has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Stop adding copyrighted text and stop removing {{copyvio-revdel}} as for legal reasons Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material. You may be blocked if copyrighted text is persistently added. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 19:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Navidarian. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. You may want to see Wikipedia:Autobiography Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 21:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Kabul Times, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not restore unsourced edits. If you have a dispute with the content of the page, please open a discussion at Talk:The Kabul Times. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Thekabultimes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thekabultimes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

who have the right to release the license for an Image?? as source the source of image office, then they did. what is the problem?

Navidarian (talk) 06:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Thekabultimes.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Thekabultimes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://thekabultimes.gov.af/2021/08/pdfs-2021-8-9/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 20:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and dear why you going to delete everything as I explained it was my own jobs to takes the picture because I contacted directly with Kabul time office

then what is the problem??

Navidarian (talk) 06:50, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an employee by The Kabul Times, or are they contracting you to do work for them? If so, then you must read and comply with Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure policy before making any further edits to Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non of them you think such bad my intention to improve the page if I don't, will coming up by others isn't my business but it's very strange such a bad police you act. Because I going to improve the page but coming up and destroyed the land ok thank such a big deal.Navidarian (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please come to gather to improve and reach the page instead of negative vibration Navidarian (talk) 18:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Navidarian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 02:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you should be properly welcomed. Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 02:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Navidarian

Hello Navidarian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Navidarian for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 21:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Navidarian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Navidarian, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Navidarian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Navidarian, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Dears thanks the following I will improve and will complete the page) --Navidarian (talk) 21:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't write about yourself; doing so is a conflict of interest. You are not an objective judge of your own notability, and it's very hard to write about yourself from a plainly factual and dispassionate point of view.

You can write a small amount about yourself on your userpage, but it is not a social media site or personal website. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dear I don't know why you delete my user page profile??? it's my right to have the user profile page and should written something on it, like other users

please restore my user page Navidarian (talk) 06:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a privately owned website, and all users have to abide by its terms of use. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right. We give users a lot of freedom to personalize their userpages, but not unrestricted freedom. You need to stick to the userpage guidelines, or (as you have discovered) the content will be removed. Please review these guidelines, and try writing a new userpage. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

درود

سلام و درود، امیدوارم حالتان خوب باشد. کاربری راجع به شما در صفحه گفتگوی من با من صحبت نمود. مواردی را بیان کرده است که لازم است منتقل کنم. مهمترین آنها، موضوع حق نشر یا کپی رایت است. مطالبی که به مقالات اضافه می کنید، حتی اگر منبع معتبر دارند، نمی بایست شباهت زیادی با متن منبع داشته باشند و می بایست پیش از افزوده شدن به مقالات، به زبان خودتان بازنویسی شوند. در مورد منبع معتبر هم باید دقت کنید. هر منبعی در اینترنت معتبر نیست. بهتر است این رهنمود را مطالعه کنید. در ضمن ویکی پدیای فارسی یا انگلیسی هیچ کدام منبع معتبر محسوب نمیشوند. --Mhhossein ^talk 04:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

سلام دوست عزیز جناب حسین خوبی حالت خوبه در خدمت عزیزم بفرمایید Navidarian (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ممنون آقای نوید، چیز خاصی نیست فقط همین مواردی که در پیام ابتدایی ام ارسال نمودم. توجه به حق نشر و استفاده از منابع معتبر. اگر سوالی دارید من در خدمتم. --Mhhossein ^talk 11:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

سلام اقا حسین متشکرم ، ببینید در مورد حق نشر بله میدانم ولی مثلا لوگوی روزنامه کابل تایمز را بمن فرستادن از طریق ایمیل خودشان که گذاشتم در ویکی و همچنان صاحب امتیاز این روزنامه تصویری ازصفحه اول روزنامه اش که هر روز در مکان عمومی یعنی در وب سایت شان منتشر میشه بمن گفت از انجا بگیرم که دوستا گیر دادن و ولی این بار صاحب روزنامه از صفحه اول عکس گرفته خودش ایمیل کرده به نظر شما دیگه حق نشر را چطوری میشه گرفت؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ یعنی بابتش باید برم افغانستان و نامه کتبی بیارم ههههه. ضمنا من چیز نوشته بودم که صفحه کابل تایمز یک خرده بهتر بشه و والبته کامل نبود و درحال کامل کردنش بودم که بازم دوستان پاکش کرد و منم از خیرش گذشتم بعد رفتم در صفحه کابری خودم راجع به بخودم نوشتم دیدم که اون را هم پاک کرد دیگه تعجب کردم و گفتم بابا این ویکی احتمالا سرش خورده به جای یعنی من به عنوان یک کاربر حق ندارم راجع به خودم بنویسم

به هر صورت ممنونNavidarian (talk) 11:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

سلام دوباره، در مورد لوگوی روزنامه بهتر است خود روزنامه از طریق ایمیل با سامانه پاسخگویی وی آر تی تماس بگیرد و اجازه نشر را صادر کند. البته استفاده منصفانه کمی کار را راحت تر کرده است. ولی استفاده از این حالت بسیار محدود است. در صفحه ~~بحث~~ کاربری هم راستش اجازه نمی دهند موارد غیر مرتبط زیادی نوشته شود. بله خب باید به فضای اینجا عادت کرد. اگر کمکی نیاز داشتید بفرمایید. من در ویکی انبار هم مدیر هستم. -- می توانید این صفحه را مطالعه بفرمایید: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Logos Mhhossein ^talk 13:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]