User talk:NaveenJaihind

Welcome!

Hello, NaveenJaihind, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! the panda ₯’ 22:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NaveenJaihind, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi NaveenJaihind!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naveen JaiHind for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naveen JaiHind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen JaiHind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 『Woona』_{Dear Celestia...} 13:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Naveen JaiHind has been reverted.
Your edit here to Naveen JaiHind was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/naveenjaihind) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to write about themselves. It is a different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction. JohnCD (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hi, thanks for message. Several problems. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: a Scholar... He is well-known for his role in Jan Lokpal Bill... He enrolled many like minded... deeply involved in the multiple social activities like... responsible for all the major decisions... huge national movement... have worked tirelessly... I was involved in the following... helped mobilize people for this fast... Due to our efforts... — and so on...
Putting "Mr" before the names of people you like seems unnecessarily obsequious
Not a reason for deletion, but there shouldn't be any url links in the text. Also a bot removed links to Twitter and facebook after your last edit
The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that you are notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I'll shortly post the deleted text here for you to work on.

Although sandboxed versions of articles are given more leeway than posted articles, they cannot be used to store text indefinitely, so you will need to work on the article in a reasonable time.
A bot made an edit after yours, removing a link to Twitter, I think. Obviously pointless reposting such links since they will be automatically removed.
Note that the comments on promotional text above should be taken only as examples. Every sentence needs to be checked for neutrality and objectivity.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the text is still unreferenced, there are still url links in the text, and the language is still pov eg He is the most popular face from Haryana Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I started editing for mos, formatting etc, but I gave up when I realised that large sections are still unsourced, and probably also copyright violations from another document.

The whole thing is a long an uncritical list of his (mostly unsourced) "achievements". Has he never received criticism from anyone. It seem strange that a political activist is universally admired and has no political opponents. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I would suggest is that for now you remove all the sections from "Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 /awareness" to the second "Right to Information". These are the sections that are problematic. They are unsourced, probably copyright infringements and written as lists (which is permitted, but writing in proper sentences is better). You can repalce the text later when it is rewritten with proper sources. If you are prepared to do this, you could then use the "move" tab to move the article back to its original title (don't cut and paste) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the draft to Naveen Jaihind Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but there is no such thing as official approval. You will have to see if other editors find problems with the article Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, NaveenJaihind. You have new messages at Bisswajit's talk page.
Message added 20:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bisswajit 20:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for Politicians

Please see WP:POLITICIAN before working on any other political-based articles. Please also see WP:COI before working on ANY articles about a subject that you have some form of relationship to. Finally, see WP:PROMO. In short: first-time politicians aren't notable, you may not write about your candidate, and do not promote anyone the panda ₯’ 11:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. the panda ₯’ 22:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]