User talk:Nationalismsucks

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Conservative Democrat have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Conservative Democrat was changed by Nationalismsucks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904624 on 2021-04-06T16:07:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harold Stassen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. The article belongs in the Category:Liberalism in the Republican Party (United States) since that information is sourced within the article. If you disagree, discuss the possible edit on the article's talk page. Shearonink (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Nationalismsucks", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you.

The notifier has not provided a reason why this username violates the username policy. If you do not understand why your username could be inappropriate for Wikipedia, please remove this message and leave a message on the notifier's talk page requesting clarification.

Treedrop (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop...

Please stop removing Category:Liberalism in the Republican Party (United States) from articles without some sort of justification, which you've made no attempt to do. Also, nationalism does indeed suck; it's one of the worst diseases of modern civilization. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Libertarianism in the Republican Party

A tag has been placed on Category:Libertarianism in the Republican Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:19, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalismsucks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nationalismsucks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anti-nationalists

A tag has been placed on Category:Anti-nationalists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Joe Satriani, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is silly--and a BLP violation, vandalism, unreferenced, etc. It will get you blocked. Drmies (talk) 00:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for this edit, minutes after I warned you for, among others, unreferenced edits. "he is libertarian if ron paul is a libertarian" means nothing, of course, except that you're engaging in WP:OR. Drmies (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Conservative Democrat have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Conservative Democrat was changed by Nationalismsucks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902219 on 2021-07-10T13:24:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Smith (comedian)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dave Smith (comedian) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]