User talk:Natalieprocter

January 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to BPP Law School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at BPP University, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Natalieprocter. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article BPP Law School, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The information included is factually incorrect

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

The information underneath 'Unfair Dismassal Tribunal' is factually incorrect in its entirety, and in conflict with the findings of the legal case. The entire section needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natalieprocter (talk • contribs) 13:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point to some sources for that on the article's talk page? You can then use the {{request edit}} template there. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at BPP University, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]