User talk:Natalie47

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Natalie47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for User talk:KSNEMC1. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AniMate^draw 23:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I found on a website that says the Wards would be ressucted

Ward im sorry I only remember one of the wards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.187.146 (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valentine

What has happened to valentine cassidine?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.187.146 (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Its been on that page for months[reply]

Warning problematic editors

Hi Natalie. Thank you for your AIV report, but unless the user being reported is engaging in very obvious and offensive behaviour (stuff like making racist or sexual comments) we'd normally expect to see a history of warnings on their talkpage before blocking them. They need to be properly warned to give them the opportunity to change their behaviour - it might not work that often, but we try to give everyone the same chance to become a good contributor.

If you're not sure about how to warn a user, you can use the templates at WP:WARN. For a first vandalism offence you could use {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}, which is a Level 1 warning. Subsequent offences can be given higher level warnings. Normally a Level 4 warning is needed before we block, though obviously this should be treated with common sense (particularly bad vandalism might warrant a Level 3 or 4 for the first offence, or even a Level 5 "only warning").

If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. In the meantime I've added a templated warning to the IP editor's talk page. If they keep it up after another warning or two, you can re report at AIV and it's likely that they will be blocked. Hope this helps, EyeSerene^talk 13:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, and thanks for your note. I'm not sure what you're getting at though (I'm sorry, I can be a bit dense at times!). The templated warning I gave that IP editor is for when someone has vandalised an article, you've removed their vandalism, and want to warn them not to do it again. The warning doesn't actually revert their edits itself, you still have to do that by hand. It's also a bit general and maybe some bits of the warning text won't actually apply which is why some editors prefer to give handwritten warnings like you first did. I tend to use the templates because it's so much quicker (if you didn't know, there's a tool called "Twinkle" that you can turn on in your preferences that lets you issue warnings and stuff with only a couple of clicks). Does that answer your question? If not, please let me know! Best, EyeSerene^talk 12:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw that you filed another AIAV report. However, there are a a few problems with your report. First, you need to learn to issue warnings on user talk pages before reporting editors for vandalism. We will generally not act on a report unless the reported editor has received several warnings (usually four) and continues to make unconstructive edits. To warn a user, edit their talk page and start a new section with the month and year in the title (this helps us quickly assess the timeframe of recent warnings). Then you can type or paste a warning template onto the page and save your changes. For ordinary vandalism, it is accepted practice to issue a series of warnings or increasing severity using the following templates:

{{subst:uw-vandalism1|article-name}} ~~~~
{{subst:uw-vandalism2|article-name}} ~~~~
{{subst:uw-vandalism3|article-name}} ~~~~
{{subst:uw-vandalism4|article-name}} ~~~~

where "article-name" should be replaced with the title of the article. These will expand to standard warning messages when saved. The "~~~~" will sign and date the warning.

For example, "{{subst:uw-vandalism2|List of General Hospital cast members}}" would issue a level-2 warning relating to the List of General Hospital cast members article. The WP:WARN page contains a list of other messages for more specific problems such as removal of content or lack of sources. I recommend that you give the template a try by going to the WP:Sandbox, pasting the following text, and saving your changes.

== August 2010 ==
{{tlx|subst:uw-vandalism2|List of General Hospital cast members}} ~~~~

Also, please use edit summaries when you edit an article - especially when you are reverting another contributor's edit. We are not mind readers and we are not going to spend an inordinate amount of time sifting through the edits to figure out what is going on. You need to give us a clue. "Reverting vandalism" is sufficient if the vandalism is obvious. Other valid reasons may be "factual errors", "unsourced speculation", "spelling" or anything else to give us and other editors an idea why you made the edit. Without such summaries, it is very difficult to assess what is happening in the article.

If you follow the above guidelines and an editor continues disruptive behavior after several warnings, you may again file a report at WP:AIAV. Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 23:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report

Dear Natalie, please stop filing reports at AIV against those editors in the 71.250.144.60 range. I left you a message here, explaining why I denied your request for a block. It is clear that 'vandalism' is not easy to define in that awful article, and it is equally clear (from your talk page also) that administrators are unlikely to act on those reports. Please stop, before an admin decides that these false charges of vandalism take up too much time and are causing disruption. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Natalie47. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
Message added 02:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just wanted to say....

thank you for helping on the List of General Hospital cast members. That person keeps creating users and IPs to insist Lisa Niles is returning. Briana Brown is already on a pilot for ABC, so she's not coming back. Nor do I see the series recasting again. I've talked to someone about getting the IP blocked, again. And to see if the page can be protected, yet again! _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 22:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kristen Alderson's new character

It says Lauren "Kiki" Jerome on the Kristen Alderson article. Check it out. P.J. (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2013 (UTCA)

Do you know who RH is playing on GH yet? P.J. (talk) 21:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, they're keeping it really secret. Natalie47 (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie I'm going to take a guess at this, RH is playing Robert Frank aka Kristen's Dad on the show again. For one we all know Katherine is really Lauren Frank. This is just me taking a huge guess at this, her last name is Jerome, and Ava mentioned that she had one daughter, than Kiki shows up, and we all know that's Ava's daughter, hello? RH is playing Mr. Robert Frank. It doesn't take a genius to figure it out. P.J. (talk) 04:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When did Ava say she only had one daughter? It may not take a genius to guess that that's what's going on, but you can't say with 100% certainty that you're right. Natalie47 (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying I'm 100% right. This is just my guess or my prediction if you will. But KA comes on during the Lauren Frank storyline as Katherine Jerome, now Katherine could be an alias that she uses. She plays Maura West's daughter on the show, Ava said she has a daughter while she was talking to Luke Spencer. She could have more than one daughter, but I highly doubt it. I could be 100% wrong, but this is my guess at what's going to happen. I would like to hear your prediction on what's going to happen. I wanna know if you agree with me. You know RH's character had something to do with the poisoned relish at The Chew. But the question is why? Maybe becuz he's Robert Frank. Look these are just my predictions, I'm talking to you as a fellow GH fan. I could be wrong, and I could be right. I've been wrong with GH before. P.J. (talk) 22:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True, if he's not Franco, I'm not sure who else he would be. But I don't know why they would bring Franco back when he would mostly likely go straight to prison. It's hard to keep a villain around once that villain has been busted for his crimes. Natalie47 (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Franco did an awesome job as Franco, but I think RH's new character whoever might he be would add some humor into it. Natalie it makes perfect sense that he's Franco, but true, he would go to prison, and the 3 actors signed a contract with ABC. Of course they could pull off the plastic surgery storyline which would explain the recast. How much do you wanna bet that Silas Clay is really Stephen Clay? P.J. (talk) 00:29, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie I was right, I told you Roger Howarth was Robert Frank, I was so right. I kinda figured it out before but wasn't sure. Now I know. P.J. (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Natalie47. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Natalie47. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Natalie47. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Montgomery aka Andre Maddox

Anthony Montgomery returned in February 2018 and March 2019 correct. But I think they were just guest appearances, I don't think he should be listed as a recurring cast member for a guest appearance. P.J. (talk) 05:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Recurring" doesn't mean on for a set amount of time. It can mean someone who makes occasional appearances, like Kimberly McCullough. Either way, there is a history of editors removing people from the list without a source, and it needs to stop. You can't make edits just because you feel they're right. Natalie47 (talk) 12:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Natalie47. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. JasonSS22 (talk) 04:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO!! I just wanted to let ya know I sent you an email message. Please check it out when you have a free moment. Thanks!!! -Jason

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Hey, just wanted to send a brief reminder that when removing cast members from cast lists, they should be moved to the previous cast members list! :-) livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]