User talk:KSNEMC1

Duplicate list

Hi, thanks for your participation, but your new List of One Life to Live cast member was just a misnamed and unnecessary duplicate of List of One Life to Live cast members, and has been redirected. I encourage you to contribute needed material that may not yet exist yet at Wikipedia. Thanks. — TAnthony^Talk 20:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rebecca Shaw, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rebecca Shaw was changed by KSNEMC1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-27T22:37:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jessica Buchanan. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Boracay Bill (talk) 02:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Speculation and blogs

Please don't add speculation to Wikipedia, as we're not here to tell the future. Especially don't link to speculation from blogs like Daytime Confidential. The articles you linked to were simply about "wishful casting". Please be more careful in the future and take a look at our policies on reliable sources. AniMate^talk 02:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your interest and participation here, but again, per WP:CRYSTAL we do not foretell the future here. Your June 2009 departure dates for certain One Life to Live characters may very well be true, but without citing reliable, verifiable sources, they are just speculation of events that have not yet occurred, which directly violates policy. This information is not essential to the articles anyway, so there is no harm in waiting until these things happen or an appropriate source is found. Thanks again. — TAnthony^Talk 16:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Im sagedarko you said that Amanda Dillon was leaving all my children there was no sourse so until u get a sourse i will delete that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.186.22 (talk) 00:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Vacations

Going on vacation doesn't mean someone has stopped portraying a character. Kimberly McCullough is still Robin Scorpio. Her contract status hasn't changed, so please stop putting the break in as though she left the show. FYI, every single actor on that show takes a vacation every single year. They're not notable breaks. AniMate^talk 22:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced misinformation

Your constant addition of unsourced false information is growing tiresome. The additions you made to Rick Hearst and Alan-Michael Spaulding aren't true. It hasn't been confirmed and it was only speculation. In fact it was reported in TV Guide Canada that Hearst passed on a short stint with the show and is now in talks with other soaps. If you continue to make these inappropriate edits, I'm going to block you. AniMate^talk 23:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Once again you have published speculation and rumors as reality in the "comings and goings" section. There is no confirmation that Ted King or Sebastian Roche are returning to General Hospital or that Tom Pelphrey will be joining the cast. Please refrain from treating rumors like they are gospel.--Natalie47 (talk) 23:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Last warning

You've been warned about posting gossip and rumors as facts several times before. DaytimeConfidential is not a reliable source, as you've been told before. The next time you post something that hasn't been verified by a reliable source or the next time you vandalize an article as you did with that Dawn Drako nonsense, you will be blocked for 24 hours. After that 48 hours, after that one week, and after that... I'm fairly certain you get the idea here. Our goal is to write an encyclopedia, not a fan site. If that is what you want, start a blog. AniMate^draw 23:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. AniMate^draw 01:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Daytime Confidential and WP:Reliable sources

Daytime confidential, while a fun site, is not considered a reliable source. They're are admittedly run by fans, not industry experts. You've been told this before. If you continue to site their rumors as facts, I'll have to block you again. Also, you edited Helena Cassadine and made it appear that a reference said she would be returning. The reference did not say that. Stop be dishonest, start siting reliable sources (soaps.com works just fine), and stop messing around. AniMate^draw 00:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to One Life to Live minor characters, you will be blocked from editing. Once again, please stop adding unsourced speculation, events which have not occurred, and non-notable trivia to articles. We appreciate your participation but ask that you focus your energies on the productive improvement of articles rather than adding daily plot updates or other trivia. Thanks. — TAnthony^Talk 01:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Blocked again

I've blocked you from editing for 48 hours. You've been warned that DaytimeConfidential.com is not a reliable source. Furthermore, you lied. Nowhere in that article did it say that Vanessa Marcil is returning. Rather the entire article talked about her as a desired recast on another soap by one blog writer. If you continue to violate our policies you will be blocked for 5 days. AniMate^draw 02:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Starr Manning Thornhart?

The video you linked to does not show Starr and Cole getting married. It doesn't even show her accepting his proposal. We don't change character names based on promos, but on actual events that have occurred on screen. Please be more careful in the future. AniMate^draw 02:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Aside from Natalie marrying Jared, have Viki or Nora actually married the men whose names you are giving them? Has Natalie officially changed her name? AniMate^draw 02:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm asking you to revert your change to List of One Life to Live cast members. It's clearly wrong information. If you don't you'll be blocked. Again. AniMate^draw 02:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Starr Manning has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Eugene Krabs (talk) 02:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

Adding false information to Wikipedia is considered vandalism. You've been blocked for three days. AniMate^draw 02:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Starr and Cole

He asked her to marry him, the are not married ... and even if they were, your page move of Starr Manning to Starr Thornhart is probably inappropriate per WP:COMMONNAME. Please stop adding your fantasy and trivia and continuing your disruptive edits, or you will be blocked for longer periods.— TAnthony^Talk

Blocked again

This time I'm blocking you for a week. Starr and Cole aren't married, they are engaged. Do you understand the difference? Regardless, this is more false information from you and coupled with your page blanking of Babe Carey is more than enough for a long time out. Next time I find you pulling this crap, it's an indefinite block. You seem to be quite confused on several levels. I'd recommend actually using talk pages and user talk pages (like I'm doing right now) to talk with other editors, because if you continue to make these types of edits without discussing it with others, you will lose all editing privileges. AniMate^draw 02:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Babe Carey a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Related article: Babe Carey Chandler — TAnthony^Talk 02:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, good luck getting unblocked, LOL. — TAnthony^Talk 02:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

You've been blocked directly, not autoblocked. User {{unblock|state your reason}} instead. AniMate^draw 03:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

If I may comment on your reason to be unblocked ... you have been warned and blocked in the recent past and have kept up your disruptive editing. Do you think you have given anyone reason to trust your promise to behave better now? Wht don't you just wait out the block, and then prove to the community that you can behave appropriately.— TAnthony^Talk 03:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

You have been warned time and time again about your silly moves. So why do you continue to do them? Babe Carey's article should be titled Babe Carey, not any other variation. Skye Chandler's article should be titled Skye Chandler, not Skye Chandler Quartermaine. Stacy Morasco should be titled Stacy Morasco, not Stacy Morasco (OLTL) or any other variation. Furthermore, you can clearly see that Stacy does not have her own article. So stop trying to get around that by creating an article for her by giving the article a different name than it would be.

Quite frankly, I have no patience for your edits, because I can see that you will not be productive here. In my opinion, you should be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 01:35, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been politely asked and harshly warned about your inappropriate moves, both with the move tool and via cut-and-paste. You also don't seem to understand (or refuse to acknowledge) basic article naming policies. I suggest that in the future you start a discussion on an article's talk page before you move it and get consensus, or you will be blocked for an even longer period of time than before. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 06:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

KSNEMC1, moving Marissa Tasker to Marissa Tasker Carey? It is so time for you to be permanently blocked from editing here. Flyer22 (talk) 21:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Moves

No more moves, period. You clearly do not understand common names. Several editors have complained about your editing style, and yet you continue to engage in the same problematic behavior. The next time I see you move a page, you're going to be blocked for a month. AniMate^draw 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. AniMate^draw 04:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I've blocked you for a month. You were warned and you've continued your disruptive behavior. AniMate^draw 05:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Last warning

Your moves are disruptive and continue to be so. Multiple editors have explained the relevant policies to you time after time and you don't listen. The next time you move a page you will be blocked indefinitely. AniMate^draw 23:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)