User talk:Nariman of eSytes

Draft:Ruhshad Nariman Daruwalla

It is definitely not ready for a move to article space, so I have returned it to draft. Favonian (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nishad Patankar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nishad Patankar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Poydoo (talk) 19:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhukar Mahadev Raut (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The9Man was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhukar Mahadev Raut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Madhukar Mahadev Raut, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The9Man | (talk) 10:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esytesinc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The9Man | (talk) 10:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhukar Mahadev Raut (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhukar Mahadev Raut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Madhukar Mahadev Raut, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruhshad Nariman Daruwalla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ruhshad Nariman Daruwalla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Amkgp 💬 17:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ruhshad Nariman Daruwalla. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you for the info Esytesinc (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ACQRO

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ACQRO, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nariman of eSytes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We are not being paid by anyone. Yes the name is that of a company but we are getting insights and adding content, NONE OF THIS IS PAID CONTENT, WE ASSURE YOU THAT

Decline reason:

You forgot to pick a new username, you forgot to address your violations of WP:COI, and you forgot to tell us what you'd write about instead. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And I'll add, if you don't mind, that you forgot that writing in upper case is considered SHOUTING and impolite. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nariman of eSytes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Isn't spam. Isn't promoting. No promotional edits. This blocking is incorrect. Please rectify. Let me know if there is anything wrong I am doing can rectify my errors. Thank you. Esytesinc (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You still have not proposed a new username. I don't believe for a second that you aren't being paid, and your edits are clearly promotional. Until you choose to stop insulting our intelligence and be forthcoming about what is going on here, there is no pathway forward. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nariman of eSytes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

esytesinnovations (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I will mention a million or may be a zillion times that I haven't got a buck of anyone for anything. Not being paid. Esytes Innovations is the company name and I chose this name to start this account on Wikipedia to create a new article for someone who wasn't there, it was a research and the article got approved, what more? I would actually want to know what makes you think I am paid? I love your intelligence but this time it is wrong. I will keep applying again and again because my God knows I am right. All five fingers aren't the same. Please do not compare me with others. Not all is available for money. Thank you.

Decline reason:

No response to multiple posts from 5 days ago about the appropriateness of the desired username. Clearly not listening. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new posts at the bottom of the page, proper flow is top-down. "esytesinnovations" is unacceptable as a username(and frankly is just more evidence of a conflict of interest or paid relationship); your username must reflect that a specific individual is exclusively operating this account(it doesn't have to be your real name). You will need to describe your connection to this company. 331dot (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the director / owner of this company. TBH I'm on a total R&D here. I am checking wiki tutorials on youtube to even reply to this :P Also I would say my name is Nariman and yes I would like my username to be the proper company name. I can give out relevant documents / info if necessary.

You are close to losing access to this page as you are not listening. Company names as usernames are not allowed unless the name identifies a specific person, such as "Nariman of Esytes". 331dot (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

rename to esytesinnovations not done.

I'm afraid that's just a more promotional version of your current username. Please choose a user name that represents a single user, not a company. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for putting it so politely. I shall change the username now.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nariman of eSytes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Changing username as requested.

Decline reason:

Since you say you "quit" below, there is no need to take action on this unblock request. Note that you will be unable to delete anything as you are not an administrator, and you can't request something be deleted until you are unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

globally renamed Esytesinc to Nariman of eSytes

Per user request globally renamed Esytesinc to Nariman of eSytes --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Username changed. Unblock pls. Thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nariman of eSytes (talk • contribs)

You only need one open unblock request at a time. You still need to address the rest of the block, such as why you denied being paid until finally admitting that you are the owner of the company, and you will need to describe your understanding of the policies described to you and how your future edits will be consistent with them, as well as telling what topics you will edit about that are unrelated to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hey I never admitted that we are being paid. As mentioned earlier this was a part of an experiement to create new wiki articles and editing some things here and there trying to contribute and learning more about Wikipedia however you are forcing me to admit that we are being paid so I will let this be here. You may not unblock or whatsoever. It won't stop me creating another wiki user. Let me tell you, you have been framing the wrong person and hence people come up with fake accounts when the real one's are played with. You really messed with a wrong person. I'm not one of those what you call spammers / scammers. I'm good people. I needn't explain you bully anymore. I quit. Thanks.

PS: Also if I am being paid then let me ensure that I delete the article about Gurmeet Singh Jolly and others which may have been accepted. I am going to Google how to delete these articles. Just for my satisfaction that "I was never paid." This was an experiement and the article got accepted. Let me still try deleting it. Thanks once again.

Oh yes, do you even know I created another account and am happy making edits and adding posts. It is cause of "Stupid and Stubborn Jerks" like you that people have to create new accounts despite them not being guilty for anything. Anyways bye now.

NOTICE TO READERS: A USELESS ADMIN HAS CAUSED UNNECESSARY BLOCKS AND HAS FORCED ME TO CLOSE THIS ID AND OPERATE FROM ANOTHER ONE. HE IS PUSHING ME TO ACCEPT THAT I HAVE BEEN PAID FOR THE ARTICLES AND EXPECTS ME TO RUN DOWN THE GUILTY LANE. WORST 1ST EXPERIENCE ON WIKIPEDIA BUT THAT DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT THERE ARE BETTER SENSIBLE ADMINS.

VIEWERS ESYTES INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED IS A COMPANY BASED IN INDIA AND WE WILL HELP YOU UPLOAD / ADD NEW ARTICLES FOR YOU IF YOU ARE NOTABLE WITHOUT ANY COST. I AM OPERATING UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME AND DIFFERENT IP ADDRESS. OUR EMAIL ADDRESS WIKIPEDIA@ESYTES.COM REMAINS THE SAME. THANK YOU.

@Nariman of eSytes: Please stop harassing administrators. The reason they kept on adding warning templates on your talk page and blocked you was because of spam or promotion. treekangaroos (talk) 15:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are choosing to evade your block, there is nothing more to discuss. 331dot (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Madhukar Mahadev Raut

Hello, Nariman of eSytes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Madhukar Mahadev Raut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]