User talk:Narayan2024

This is Narayan2024's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxila Business School (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sungodtemple were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two of the sources are just inclusion on an arbitrary list, and the other two are PR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taxila Business School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 21:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback on the Taxila Business School Wikipedia draft. We appreciate your time and attention to detail in reviewing our submission.

We acknowledge the concerns raised regarding the lack of in-depth, reliable, secondary, and strictly independent references in the draft. We understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability and notability. We will work diligently to address these issues by incorporating additional references that meet the specified criteria.

We also take note of the observation that the submission reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia entry. We apologize for any oversight in maintaining a neutral point of view, and we are committed to revising the content to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia's standards. Our intention is to provide a balanced and informative article that contributes positively to the Wikipedia community.

We appreciate your guidance and will carefully review and rewrite the submission, keeping in mind the mistakes to avoid and the policies outlined in your feedback. If there are any specific areas that require particular attention or clarification, please feel free to provide further guidance.

Once the necessary revisions are complete, we will resubmit the draft for your review. Thank you for your understanding and assistance in ensuring the quality and compliance of our Wikipedia article.

Best regards, Narayan2024 (talk) 21:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we" in what you say?

What is your relationship with this organisation? I will post a separate message below about paid editing, please read it and respond as necessary. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Narayan2024! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 21:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello Narayan2024. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Taxila Business School, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Narayan2024. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Narayan2024|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DoubleGrazing,

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention, and I appreciate your dedication to upholding Wikipedia's standards.

I want to clarify that I do not have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting the topic of Taxila Business School, and I am not receiving any form of compensation for my edits, broadly construed. I am here as a Wikipedia contributor to share unbiased and valuable information.

To address your concerns, I have added the

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

template to my user page with the relevant disclosure information:

Narayan2024, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Taxila Business School on behalf of Kishor Sharma for their contributions to Wikipedia.

If you have any further questions or if there are additional steps I need to take, please let me know. I am committed to ensuring transparency and compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards,

Narayan2024 Narayan2024 (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxila Business School (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not one of the sources cited contributes towards notability per WP:GNG / WP:ORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taxila Business School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Taxila Business School

Hello Narayan2024, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Taxila Business School, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxila Business School (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadette^Edit! 09:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anant Mukesh Ambani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anant Mukesh Ambani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Previously deleted, attempt to workaround the redirect at Anant Ambani. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my submission on Anant Mukesh Ambani and for your feedback. I understand your concerns about the article's tone and potential conflict of interest. I apologize if the initial draft came across as promotional.

I will take some time to revise the article and address the issues you've raised. Specifically, I will:

Revise the language: I will carefully review the wording to ensure a neutral and encyclopedic tone, removing any language that may be perceived as promotional or celebratory.

Focus on factual information: I will prioritize factual details about Anant Ambani's life, career, and activities, avoiding any subjective opinions or interpretations.

Strengthen sourcing: I will add more citations from reliable and independent sources to support the information presented, ensuring verifiability and neutrality.

Address the redirect issue: I understand the previous deletion and will ensure the article does not attempt to circumvent any redirects.

I appreciate the opportunity to improve the draft and will resubmit it for review once I have addressed these concerns. I am committed to creating a neutral and informative article that meets Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you for your guidance and support. Narayan2024 (talk) 05:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello Narayan2024. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Narayan2024. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Narayan2024|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Above, you have shown that you are aware of and prepared to comply with WP:PAID; please make sure to disclose every paid contribution,and to do it before you edit a topic you are paid to edit rather than wait until you are asked about it. bonadea contributions talk 06:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out and bringing this to my attention. I understand the concerns you've raised regarding my edits and the impression they may have given.

I want to assure you that I am not receiving any compensation, directly or indirectly, for my contributions to Wikipedia. My edits on Anant Mukesh Ambani, and any other topic, are purely voluntary and driven by my own interest in the subject matter.

I am committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia and value the integrity of this platform. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. Narayan2024 (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You claim above that you are not paid to edit. Since you used an AI for that response it's a little difficult to believe it, especially since you then keep recreating and resubmitting drafts for articles that have been previously created for pay, and have been deleted (usually more than once). bonadea contributions talk 09:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What is your connection to Tarunwikiindia? --bonadea contributions talk 09:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anant Ambani (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero indication of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anant Ambani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 06:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivek Bindra (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Plenty of unsourced content, very few independent sources, no credible claim of notability, and full of promotional hype (such as the entire awards/recognition section which lists only non-notable awards and non-awards such as his registering various activities with Guinness Book of Records). There's quite a substantial history of spammy articles about him being created by various UPE accounts, many of them blocked for socking.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivek Bindra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Narayan2024! Your additions to Salasar Balaji Temple have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 05:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivek Bindra (October 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 07:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bizcolumnist per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pcmishradigital. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]