User talk:Naomikrate

Stephen Charles Mott

Just for future reference, if you sequester an article into draftspace, as you did at Draft:Stephen Charles Mott, then you need to also either remove or disable the category declarations on it, because draftspace pages can't be filed in articlespace categories per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. There's no policy mandating whether you disable or remove, so you're free to do either one — but if you opt to disable the categories, you can do it by placing a colon before the word "Category" in each category link or by wrapping all of the categories inside the {{Draft categories}} template. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this wonderful piece of information, I felt the need to go through several special guideline and policy pages. Still, I think it will take time before I get the know-how of uploading and moving pages on Wikipedia. Naomikrate (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drafting articles

Rather than move long time articles into draft space you should tag them for the problems. You should also send them to WP:AfD. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will remember that. How long would you suggest an article has to remain on Wikipedia to be considered a "long-time articles"? Naomikrate (talk) 05:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Village pump (policy), articles more than 90 days old should not be draftified. There was a policy proposal for 30 days, but that did not reach consensus. David notMD (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Naomikrate, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias Liz! I'll join the Teahouse soon! What's the fastest way to become a Wikipedia admin? Naomikrate (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Velasquez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Velasquez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Velasquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spicy (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Velasquez

Hello Naomikrate,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nick Velasquez for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Nick Velasquez to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

firefly ( t · c ) 20:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]