User talk:Nanten
Welcome
[edit]
|
Cool. Thanks. --Nanten 02:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Music
[edit]Hi! I was just wondering if most of [Special:Contributions/James_Epstein these songs] are notable under WP:MUSIC or the like? Some of the articles are just a single sentence, and would probably fit better into the article for their respective albums. What are your thoughts? HawkerTyphoon 03:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
They probably aren't notable, but I edited one of them into a form that isn't unreadable. I have no strong opinion about whether they should be kept or not, and if they are eventually deleted, I wouldn't mind too much. --Nanten 02:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Notability of Ian McElroy
[edit]A tag has been placed on Ian McElroy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Raerth 22:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Reverting vandalism
[edit]You said in your edit to Viking that you were reverting vandalism. In fact that editor made many vandal changes in the same edit, and you only fixed one of them. See Help:Reverting to find out how to revert vandalism correctly. If you stumble upon an article where the first part is vandalism, you can safely assume the rest has been vandalised in some way and try to find a good version to revert to, or the correct edits to undo, as the case may be. Because of your intervening spelling and link fixes (which were good edits on their own), the fact that I was tired from a day at university, the fact that I am blind and use speech to access Wikipedia and therefore couldn't believe that all the changes were made by one vandal, it took me 42 minutes to clean the article up and reintroduce all your changes. Graham87 10:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
FFCompendium text
[edit]Hello,
I noticed that you made an edit to Characters of Final Fantasy Tactics on November 18th, involving the description of Zalbag/Zalbaag. It seems that most of the text for that edit was taken almost word-for-word from my site, FFCompendium.com. I have reverted that part of the edit, and ask that you please do not take descriptions from my site in the future. My site's uniqueness is almost entirely dependent on its text rather than its images and I almost never give permission for that text to be used. I have not had time to look at other changes you have made, but I ask that you please respect my wishes and remove any content that was mainly taken from my site.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cidolfas (talk • contribs) 23:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but I didn't copy any text. I spent several hours that day working on that article, never once consulted your site, and only corrected spelling and fixed style issues in the section on Zalbag. In fact, you've got the wrong person. The information that you removed has been in this article for an extremely long time. This is what the page looked like immediately after being split from the FFT article in July of 2005. In the future, do not accuse me of something I didn't do. Nanten (talk) 03:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC) (Cross-posted onto Cidolfas' talk page.)
My apologies. I had no way of knowing what page it was originally part of; I simply looked at the history of this particular page and looked to see who was responsible for adding the content in question. I may have read the diff wrong as well. 8-( You're right, the change has been around for years. I'm very sorry for the misconception. Cidolfas (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of post-grunge bands, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Here and Now and Dark Horse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Nanten. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Survey about How Historical Knowledge is Produced on Wikipedia
[edit]Hi Nanten,
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)