User talk:NadirAli/Archive 3

"A New Hope" wasn't added in the first "Star Wars" film until its re-release on April 10, 1981.

I really hate to break this to you, but the title "A New Hope" wasn't added in the first "Star Wars" film until its re-release on April 10, 1981. So I suggest that you change the year from 1979 to 1981. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for my own reading interest

Articles/pages I created since I re-joined Wikipedia

User:Nadirali/articles and other pages I created since I re-joined Wiki

Nomination of Trash Bag Bunch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trash Bag Bunch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash Bag Bunch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Euryalus (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Requested move on original Star Wars films

How does it work? Where do I go?--00717F (talk) 04:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of Star Trek and Star Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Alexander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cat coat genetics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are a high quality source. Please see WP:MEDRS. People can have constipation at any time. If you are trying to say that menstruation causes constipation you will need a proper reference. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trash Bag Bunch

Please stop reverting the redirect link on this article as has been done here and here. The decision reached by discussion of other wikipedia editors was that the article did not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion but should not be deleted and should be redirected to the parent page instead. The result was not to "keep" the article as your reverts claim. Also please do not alter the note on the article's talk page as was done here. This will not change the outcome of that AFD. If you disagree with the outcome, you may initiate a new discussion and gain a different consensus for that article . --RadioFan (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RadioFan is correct in his comments. The AfD was closed as redirect, and that decision cannot be overturned unless you take it to deletion review. Please do not change it to "keep". Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (discuss) @ 15:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, NadirAli. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RadioFan (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 30 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi Nadirali. This and this were very inappropriate edits. You deliberately altered someone else's AfD close to make it look like the AfD closed as keep in order to revert the article to its pre-discussion version. Don't do that again. Sam Walton (talk) 21:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Though I stand by my above comment - you definitely shouldn't have attempted to deceive another editor like that - I just wanted to let you know that I agree that the AfD should have closed as keep, and have changed the outcome of the discussion since the original was a non-admin closure. Sam Walton (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helsinki Central Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Your recent editing history at Pseudoscience shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mackenzee Wittke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mackenzee Wittke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzee Wittke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests

If the matter (on Star Wars) was brought up again, wouldn't it just be rejected in a land slide? I have even began making preparations for a future RM but it would likely be rejected because the consensus last time seems to be hostile towards the situation. Are you sure it would be able to get a larger amount of participants if it was brought up on WikiProject Star Wars next time? Cheers. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 22:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assalam Alaikum

Hello brother: are u sindhi please reply on my talk page please brother..--محمد مجیب (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corruption in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hero worship. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christopher's Dairy: Echoes of Dollanganger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're gonna bring up star wars

You have to talk about the hero's journey. Since Star Wars was modelled on the Hero's Journey, it's impossible to talk about its potential influences without accounting for the Hero's Journey first. Serendi ^pod ous 23:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted on the article's talk page

I expect you to respect the WP:BRD guideline and be constructive. Serendi ^pod ous 23:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I undid some Star Wars edits you did because you didn't provide sources ,per wikipedia policy ^{[verification needed]} . Please add them in here is one source you can add http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/george-lucas-and-the-cult-of-darth-vader-20050602 RbAxM33320 (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Doniago. Your recent edit to the page Superman III appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A New Hope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Technology in Star Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decompression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Star wars concussion missile.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Star wars concussion missile.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Daniel Radcliffe dresses up as Boba Fett on The Ellen DeGeneres Show.png

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Radcliffe dresses up as Boba Fett on The Ellen DeGeneres Show.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward move

I see I missed your comment on my talk page asking to discuss the X-wing move, although you missed my initial request on the actual article talk page to discuss the move. Per WP:BRD, your move should be reverted, and I'm asking you please to do that yourself until a broader consensus can emerge. I've requested additional input at the Star Wars wikiproject page. In the meantime, please respond to the points I raise on the article talk page (a far more appropriate venue for discussing this than either of our's talk page). --EEMIV (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NadirAli. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eric Walker (entertainer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Less Than Zero. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Destroyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A New Hope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fantasy violence

added links pointing to Cause and effect, Magical creatures and Horror

Science fiction violence

added a link pointing to Red Planet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Star Trek and Star Wars

I checked on Comparison of Star Trek and Star Wars of out interest as I last edited it when it was up for deletion some years ago. I found that the content had degraded somewhat. There was overuse of templates, the content was in bullet points (the WP:MOS says "Do not use lists if a passage is read easily as plain paragraphs", also see WP:PROSE), the text was bitty and had lost flow, some referenced content had been lost, and some of the content was really original research, i.e. was not based on sources comparing the two but was editors' own comparisons, e.g. the "Criticisms of both franchises" section (which could expand indefinitely and has nothing to do with a direct comparison of the two) and the "Future" section, which is not relevant to the topic. Some of the content was also in the wrong section, e.g. people who have worked on each is not a "similarity". A section title of "Comic relief" is not appropriate, and is really trivia - we should avoid sections on trivia (see WP:TRIVIA). Of course you can continue to edit, but please do not revert back to your preferred version. Fences&Windows 20:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I note another editor removed the "Criticism of both franchises" section in August 2014 and you restored it without discussion. Please read WP:OWN and WP:OR. Fences&Windows 20:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For ST vs SW

[1][2][3][4][5]

[6][7][8]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bully, the Bullied, and the Bystander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bystanders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Refs for physics and SW for a later time

[9] [10] [11]

Articles to improve with

Death Star [12]

Arbitration motion proposed regarding you

Hi Nadirali, just letting you know that a motion to suspended your topic ban has been proposed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images for possible use

[13][14]- darth vader vs link (legend of zelda)

[15]-wierd science fantasy

[16]- star wars concept art

[17][18]- a depiction of a science fictional civilization living an ancient Earth-like existence; a concept which Star Wars is a major example of.

[19] classic science fantasy films

[20] another depiction of a science fictional civilization living an ancient Earth-like existence; a concept which Star Wars is a major example of.

[21] a sketch and helmet based on the original concept design of boba fett.

[22] a statue of boba fett based on the original concept design

[23][24]- Pakistan Rangers

[25]- Pakistan Rangers (editorial use only photos)

[26] Artist’s comparison of the Dawn spacecraft, which has three ion engines, and a "Star Wars" TIE (Two Ion Engine) Fighter. Image credit: NASA/JPL

For Technology in Star Wars

[27] weapons and technology guide. [28]

Alex Jones (radio host)

See WP:EL#Official links. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Star Wars: Force for Change

added a link pointing to Cameo

Star Wars sources and analogues

added a link pointing to Celtic folklore

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration motion regarding you

By motion of the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment:

Nadirali (talk · contribs)'s topic ban from "India, Pakistan and Afghanistan broadly construed" that is part of their unban conditions is suspended for a period of one year. During the period of suspension, this topic ban may be reinstated by any uninvolved administrator as an arbitration enforcement action should Nadirali fail to adhere to Wikipedia editing standards in the area previously covered by the topic ban. Appeal of such a reinstatement would follow the normal arbitration enforcement appeals process. After one year from the date of passage of this motion, if the topic ban has not been reinstated or any reinstatements have been successfully appealed, the topic ban will be lifted.

This message also serves to notify you that your amendment request has also been archived, and can now be found here

For the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 21:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Understood--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 00:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For my own reading interest

[29][30][31][32][33][34][35]

December 2015

Your addition to File:Frontier Corps commando.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

useful templates for article improvements

{Friendly search suggestions}
{clear}
{notelist}

Moves

User:Nadirali/Star Wars - Science Fair. This is not ready. DS (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To create and improve

Create

Star Wars : Evolution of the Lightsaber Duel
Fantasy fandom
Dr. Akhtar Husain
Iran-Saudi Arabia proxy conflict
Philosophy and religion in Star Trek

Improve

The Force is not magic

[36]

January 2016

Your recent editing history at BB-8 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — TAnthony^Talk 22:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Physics and Star Wars may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

most of which were mysteriously built. At the time the [[Rebel Alliance (Star Wars)|Rebel Alliance)]] used territory on Yavin as their hidden base, the only thing left on the moon was plant, insect

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Something I could use later on

NadirAli is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tatooine

added a link pointing to Droid

Technology in Star Wars

added a link pointing to Danish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Languages of Pakistan

The laws haven't changed yet. There is no amendment to the constitution. The court judgement was simply to promote Urdu in the government. This is correct for now. I read the sources and this is what it said. I know the headlines that say "English is to replace Urdu" is misleading to what was actually done and they are just shock headlines. For a reliable source, please go by what it says in the constitution.-Akhila3151996 (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/no-english-please-were-pakistani/. Also please read the actual body of the other sources you mentioned instead of just the headline. It hasn't said that the law was changed. I can't change it unless the laws in the constitution change.-Akhila3151996 (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For ST vs SW

On Learning Science and Pseudoscience from Prime-Time Television Programming by Christopher Henry Whittle

Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy edited by William F. Williams

[37]

Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker by Jonathan C. Smith

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Physics and Star Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of Star Trek and Star Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canonical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Your recent editing history at Tatooine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 21:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Partition of India does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sindh Police, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abduction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

So, you did it. Despite multiple warnings, you have continued making bad image uploads. This time (File:Pakistan police vehicle.jpg), it was a blatant copyright violation, a commercial press photo [38] fraudulently claimed to be your own work. I have accordingly re-blocked you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

NadirAli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

While I was wrong to upload an archived picture in my computer from years back without a proper license, I do not believe it justifies an indefinite block. If I was blocked multiple times for copyright violations, then an indefinite would be arguably justified. At the least this administrator should have sought community consensus at ANI for such a block. Also given is that I have not been blocked prior to this in almost two years. I intend to work on: -Physics and Star Wars -History of Hindustani -Hindustani language -The X-Files Sources and Analogues -The Force (Star Wars) -Private military company And to create: -Iran-Saudi Arabia proxy conflict -Star Wars: Evolution of the Lightsaber Duel -Philosophy and Religion in Star Trek -Dr Akhtar Husain (Raipuri) My unblock request on my talkpage has not been reviewed in more than 24 hours. -Images uploaded by me have at times been successful (infact at least half the time), including topics that I was previously banned from such as Frontier Corps, Indo-Iranian languages and Paramilitary forces of Pakistan. -I had also successfully uploaded an important chart that I created just before I was blocked (also previously covered by the topic ban) and it was a major contribution to the article. I have also found additional scholarly sources for articles requiring citations covered in this topic area. That is why I don't believe that an entire topic ban reinstatement is a good idea at this time because there are several pages requiring my attention and updating (which I have successfully accomplished since the ban was lifted) in addition to the fact that I have uploaded images in the past under the wrong terms of use, but on articles not covered by my previous topic ban. When I appealed this topic ban, I suggested the arbcom a restriction of one revert per week in this area, but they were generous to suspend the topic ban altogether with the option of re-enforcing it within a year of it being lifted.

Accept reason:

I am unblocking you under the following conditions:

You are hereby topic banned from uploading images on Wikipedia indefinitely.
- Should you wish to ask for this ban to be suspended, you may do so at WP:AN after not violating the ban for 1 year.
- If you violate this ban, you will be blocked indefinitely and a siteban will be proposed at WP:ANI (considering your past actions).

Please take the proper precautions to ensure you do not violate this ban, and I hope you realize that we are being very generous to lift this block at all. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative note - The official log of this conditional unblock topic ban can be seen at WP:ER/UC, and a formal notification was made at WP:AN (diff). Thank you, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]