User talk:Nabinluhagun

This is Nabinluhagun's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabin Luhagun (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EchidnaLives were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabin Luhagun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nabinluhagun! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nabin Luhagun

Nabin Luhagun 202.51.84.50 (talk) 08:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Nabinluhagun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Bipin Karki. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 12:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nabinluhagun. For marking this page only Lemonaka (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nabinluhagun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to request that my Wikipedia account be unblocked. I previously requested this from another account, but you told me to request from my real account, so I am now doing so.I was banned a few months ago for making a number of mistakes on Wikipedia. I have since learned from my mistakes. At the time, I was not aware of the Wikipedia policies, but I am now confident that I can contribute to Wikipedia in a positive and compliant way.I have removed my other fake accounts and would like to ask for a last chance. If I make only one mistake, I understand that I could be permanently blocked. However, I believe that I have learned from my mistakes and that I can now be a valuable contributor to Wikipedia.I would be grateful if you would consider unblocking my account so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration. Nabinluhagun (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your last sockpuppet was blocked less than two months ago; the general expectation is that you will wait at least six months with no sockpuppeting before an unblock can be considered. I see no reason to make an exception here. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nabinluhagun (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nabinluhagun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrator, I hope you are doing well. In February 2022, I was blocked from editing English Wikipedia because of checkuser had confirmed to me that I was using multiple accounts. In January earlier this year, I had made an unblock request but declined as block evasion, after that I have waited for six months without zero evasion on my account and contributed on Nepali Wikipedia. In this period, I have made no edits on English Wikipedia, believing that I will deserve a second chance. I will keep making productive and constructive contributions on Wikipedia with my account and I have disclosed all those accounts which I had created before. Best regards.

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion as WikipedianRam, despite your attempt to mislead us. You are now considered banned by the community (WP:CBAN) under WP:3X. No administrator is free to unilaterally lift your block. Yamla (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.