User talk:NYCKNP

Speedy deletion of Eros International Ltd.

A tag has been placed on Eros International Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

spam + a clear cut copyvio of the company's website.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pascal.Tesson 02:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sudeep Saahir

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sudeep Saahir, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DP 23:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Red Chillies Entertainment

A tag has been placed on Red Chillies Entertainment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Pc0332700fu8.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pc0332700fu8.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Imgm1TV6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Imgm1TV6.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Nehaflix 1948 128581464.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nehaflix 1948 128581464.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image policy

Hi. I noticed that you seem unsure about Wikipedia's policies about uploading images. If you read the following, it should help you understand more about images on Wikipedia:

The image policy on Wikipedia encourages administrators to delete images if they meet certain requirements. Many administrators delete a lot of images according to this policy, so many new Wikipedians have many questions about it. Here are the most common reasons that a particular image might have been deleted.

Did the image have a copyright tag? On Wikipedia, all images have to have a valid copyright tag. This lets us know whether you made the image or not, what its copyright status is, etc. Wikipedia:Image copyright tags will tell you all you need to know about these tags. If your image didn't have a copyright tag, just reupload it with a correct tag. I'd be glad to help you with this if need be.
Was the image "fair-use replaceable"? On Wikipedia, an image is "non-free" if it's copyrighted and not explicitly released under a free license. (Almost all the images you find on the Web are non-free.) We can only use non-free images under a strict set of criteria. The first of these is, if a free image exists or could be created that could replace this image, then we can't use the non-free image. For example, a non-free photo of a living celebrity or a particular model of car would probably be replaceable, since the subject of the photo still exists and could be photographed by a Wikipedian. These images wouldn't be allowed on Wikipedia. However, if the subject is no longer available (because the person depicted is dead, for example), then the image might be allowed.
Was the image "non-commercial only"? Wikipedia is non-commercial, so it might seem that we can use images that say they are free to use for non-commercial purposes only. But this is not the case. Wikipedia is a "free" encyclopedia, so it's important to us that anyone (even commercial companies) be able to reuse all our content. For this reason, we can only use an image if another website could also use the image, even for commercial purposes.

Hope this helps you understand. Thank You. - Bhavesh.Chauhan ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 15:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in UTV Motion Pictures

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on UTV Motion Pictures, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because UTV Motion Pictures is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting UTV Motion Pictures, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]