User talk:NVNCVL

This is NVNCVL's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: NVNCVL (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NVNCVL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NVNCVL! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 10:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Per your posts at the Teahouse and your threat on User talk:Jimfbleak, you have been blocked indefinitely as not being here to build an encyclopedia. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 08:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

oh come on, it was OBVIOUSLY satire when i "threatened" him. and that "unblock your reason here thing" is needlessly complicated.

You're STILL SILENCING A VICTIM OF POLICE BRUTALITY. I was even on the last Dr. Drew. NVNCVL (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not Dr Drew, and not for righting great wrongs altogether; it's an encyclopedia. If you have trouble finding the curly brackets or the pipe on your keyboard, just type your unblock request below and I'll put it into the complicated (?) template for you. (When I wake up.) The template contains code that calls an uninvolved admin to the page, so it's not needless. Bishonen | tålk 22:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

You should read what Bishonen has said carefully, she is an experienced administrator, and she is giving you an opportunity to continue to make positive contributions here, if you wish. I'm not bothered by your post on my talk, but you must accept that you can't use Wikipedia as a platform for your grievances. This is an encyclopaedia, that's not appropriate Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:42, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no, she has completely removed my ability to contribute anything. And encyclopedias are used for disseminating important information, right? I'd like to be able to editorialize on abuse against females *in general* because I've witnessed so much of it. Stop silencing victims and start listening. NVNCVL (talk) 11:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NVNCVL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because you don't like some of my submissions doesn't mean I have nothing to contribute. Hell, I've got a LOT to report about abusive institutions. I can start with those. Heck, Havenwyck Hospital *doesn't even have a page yet.* There needs to be one. You have no idea how many of my friends have been abused in that institution. Let me write the page. I can be unbiased.

Decline reason:

Please find some other place to air your grievances. None of this is appropriate for Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NVNCVL (talk) 22:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been hassled by bureaucracy for the past two years since my ex husband kidnapped my child. I'm even up on felony charges because I keep demanding to be allowed to speak with her.

Maybe it's time for you to wake up. NVNCVL (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NVNCVL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because it's the only decent choice you have

Decline reason:

Wikipedia isn't a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Please find some other site to pursue your grievances. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.