User talk:NEThomasYoung

License tagging for Image:6265 Sabre Island.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:6265 Sabre Island.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

New article: Usakhelauri

Nice job! If you added a few more paragraphs it could be nominated for Did you know? and appear on the main page. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 17:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually... is that your blog - [1]? --Fang Aili ^talk 17:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cool. Can you ask him to put a note on his blog that he releases the content to GFDL? This way it can stay on Wikipedia (otherwise, technically it's a copyright violation). Thanks!! --Fang Aili ^talk 17:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blogspam

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Vsmith 22:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ojaleshi

A tag has been placed on Ojaleshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merzbow (talk) 07:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monroe Street House

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Monroe Street House, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable student residence, no third party references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG (talk) 09:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I merged it into Quincy House (Brookland). Bearian (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hoodstock

The article Hoodstock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced for three years, and there is no indication as to why this event is notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 10:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]