User talk:NASDitGuy

NASDitGuy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NASDitGuy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello NASDitGuy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NASDitGuy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NASDitGuy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 15:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, User talk:GSS -- added. Not sure if this really qualifies as the relationship to Cambium isn't at all direct, but -- better safe than sorry. NASDitGuy (talk) 02:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status. As per WP:Paid, please provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services e.g. your Upwork account etc. Thank you. GSS ^💬 02:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; none. Cambium told us they had a lot of difficulty getting on Wikipedia. I'm helping out. I'm not actually paid by Cambium -- but it is a NASDAQ-listed company. Clear? NASDitGuy (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then how and where you were hired by Cambium? how did they get to know about you? and are you sure this wasn't on Upwork? GSS ^💬 03:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cambium company logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cambium company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In light of certain off-wiki evidence

I do not believe that you have been truthful w.r.t your paid-editing disclosures, pursuant to the highly legitimate queries by GSS. Can you re-attempt them lest you end up blocked? ∯WBG^converse 17:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cambium Networks has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cambium Networks. Thanks! Andy Dingley (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambium Networks (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All coverage is either WP:ROUTINE or not significant. If the company is notable, it is not shown by the sources provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cambium Networks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cambium Networks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cambium Networks

Hello, NASDitGuy. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cambium Networks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cambium Networks

Hello, NASDitGuy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cambium Networks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]