User talk:N738139

Gravitation

\Delta \tau _{g}={\frac {g}{c^{2}}}\sum _{i=1}^{k}(h_{i}-h_{0})\Delta t_{i}

How the difference between 0m and 5000m on Earth should be today:

\Delta \tau _{g}={\frac {~10}{9*10^{16}}}(5000m-0m)4.5*10^{9}years=21.9hours

Why general relativity doesn't match with positions of the moon between 0m and 5000m (synchronization of the earth rotational period) ?N738139 (talk) 00:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not important, thanks anyway

Hi, I guess you noticed I withdrew my statement. I apologise again for my mistake. Nil Einne (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Criticism of the theory of relativity, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Relativity of simultaneity. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Criticism of the theory of relativity. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - DVdm (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Relativity of simultaneity. DVdm (talk) 16:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also

2A02:120B:C3C4:29C0:842A:C3AE:430F:EC90 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
2A02:120B:C3C4:29C0:D850:7EDC:8B41:3E41 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

- DVdm (talk) 16:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Relativity of simultaneity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Katie^talk 21:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:N738139 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: ). Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 01:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing and abuse of multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Pushing a WP:FRINGE point of view into relativity articles, one that appears to be original research. See WP:MADEUP. EdJohnston (talk) 05:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for having written that sun rising on earth is synchronized at all altitudes

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N738139 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know my behavior is limit out of border (disruptive editing), but I did the same as DVdm. He first violated the 3RR and nobody stopped him. I tried only to add a point of view (see last removed sentences by DVdm on wiki talk "Relativity of simultaneity"). I appologize (abuse of multiple accounts) a lot about what happenend (I am not used to always connect with my account and write as a wiki professional), but I think Wikipedia could accept all comments (mine seems quite simple and in accordance with Wiki rules). My point of view is that there is a vandetta by user VQuakr and DVdm in order to maintain the orthodox view that theory of relativity should not be questionned. I hope you will take time to analyse the path of events AND CONTENTS that happened relative to my blocking account. My only wish is to be heard by reason and not by procedures. Sincerely. P.S. I was blocked after everything went fine. N738139

Decline reason:

I know my behavior is limit out of border (disruptive editing) -- that's all I need to read. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.