User talk:N5rh

Welcome!

Hello, N5rh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Lim Wee-Chai, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lim Wee-Chai without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CLCStudent: Hi CLCStudent, thank you for reaching out to us on your concerns https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:N5rh. We are from Top Glove's Corporate Communications department who are in charge in updating the company's and founder's (lim wee chai) page as and when necessary information are obtained. Our aim is to update accurate developments accordingly. Our edits are genuine and are not tests in any way. In line with this, we wish to clarify the edits we made on Lim Wee Chai's Universiti Malaya resignation reflects accurate information as we have cited. Lim Wee Chai's directorship was not at all politically linked and we have also clarified this with Malaysian Insights (https://www.themalaysianinsight.com/s/84170). However, we noticed the edits we made were reverted to the previous information which was not accurate. We hope this clarifies. Please advise on how our changes can be maintained. Thank you. N5rh (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, anytime you delete a significant amount of content, you should provide an edit summary, which you can find the box for if you look beneath the window you use to edit a page. I don't doubt that you are acting in good faith, but I will need to see edit summaries for significant deletions. CLCStudent (talk) 01:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lim Wee-Chai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dirkbb: Hi Dirkbb, thank you for reaching out to us on your concerns https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:N5rh. We are from Top Glove's Corporate Communications department who are in charge in updating this page as and when necessary information are obtained. Our aim is to update accurate developments on the company's and founder's page accordingly. Our edits are genuine and are not tests in any way. In line with this, we wish to clarify the edits we made on Lim Wee Chai's Universiti Malaya resignation reflects accurate information as we have cited. Lim Wee Chai's directorship was not at all politically linked and we have also clarified this with Malaysian Insights (https://www.themalaysianinsight.com/s/84170). However, we noticed the edits we made were reverted to the previous information which was not accurate. We hope this clarifies. Please advise on how our changes can be maintained. Thank you. N5rh (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the thing. That link to Malaysian Insights is to a letter to the editor written by you or another of Lim's representatives. It does not meet Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. MI has not updated their original story—had they done that, then we would also update the article. Since they have not, Wikipedia guidelines are very clear: our article needs to stick to what is stated in independent, reliable sources. This is true when any editor tries to change the article, but is especially true when a paid editor with a conflict of interest, like yourself, is editing. —C.Fred (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Top Glove, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello N5rh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:N5rh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=N5rh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 21:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 08:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. SmartSE (talk) 08:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse:: Hi there, just to disclose there is no paid advocates or any compensation received. Apologies if there is a misunderstanding. We are from Top Glove's Corporate Communications department who are in charge in updating this page as and when necessary information are obtained. Our aim is to update accurate developments on the company's and founder's page accordingly. Our edits are genuine and are not tests in any way. However, we noticed the edits we made were reverted to the previous information which was not accurate. We hope this clarifies. Please advise on how our changes can be maintained. Thank you.N5rh (talk) 01:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are from Top Glove's Corporate Communications department I presume you are paid for this job no? If so, that's paid editing. Also does "We" mean that multiple people use this account? SmartSE (talk) 10:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: Yes, I am getting paid for this job. Again I apologize, as i am confuse with the regulations. However, I've disclose on my user account as per request. Is there anything else required? "We" as in Top Glove, but actually only me. Anyway, thank you for your assistance, appreciate it. N5rh (talk) 01:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: Hi there, can i resume to edit/add information now? N5rh (talk) 04:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making the required disclosures and clarifying that "we" is just you. You can make edits, but please do so by making requests using {{request edit}} on Talk:Top Glove rather than editing the article directly. Any changes you wish to make need to be supported by a source that is ideally independent of the company (i.e. newspapers etc. rather than the corporate website). Let me know if you have any other questions. SmartSE (talk) 08:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: Thank you for your response. However, certain information are based on the corporate website (i.e. market capitalization, production capacity). what do you suggest i do about that? N5rh (talk) 01:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

most of the information of Top Glove are based on corporate website. Please advice on what should i do. Thank you N5rh (talk) 01:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! As suggested above, please make any suggestions for the Top Glove article by using {{request edit}} on Talk:Top Glove. If you can provide independent reliable sources, you can do so on Talk:Top Glove as well. Good luck! GoingBatty (talk) 02:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hi there, who can I liaise with on the update of Top_Glove ? We'd like to update on the ILO Indicators, you may refer to here; https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/top-glove-resolves-all-11-ilo-forced-labour-indicators N5rh (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC) N5rh (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can request changes on the talk page, ideally using a "change X to Y per [reference]" format. Also, who is "we"? Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 11:31, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User: Giraffer: thank you for your suggestion. Referring to your question, we as in Top Glove. N5rh (talk) 01:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok – is this account being used by one person on behalf of the company, or being shared among various individuals? Thanks, Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 08:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User: Giraffer: just by one person on behalf of the company. thank you N5rh (talk) 09:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. (I was concerned because accounts are not permitted to be operated by more than one person, largely due to the issues that can arise with copyright attribution, and "we" implies that more than one person is operating an account.) Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 09:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from RFZYNSPY

This is to notify you that I responded to your edit request. Click the blue "Talk:Top Glove" button above. RFZYNSPY ^talk 01:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:RFZYNSPY, thank you for your feedback. Please find my amended edits on "Talk: Top Glove" as suggested by you for your review please N5rh (talk) 03:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/N5rh. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]