User talk:N1h1l

Welcome!

Hello, N1h1l, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 23:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism

Thank you for your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism. I have closed the debate as no consensus. Per the recommendation from you and others that the article was US-centric, the {{Globalize}} tag was added to the article. Please do help to improve the article or contribute further to discussion on what ought to be done with it. Again, thanks! -- Jonel | Speak 03:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Anna Mae Aquash

Yesterday I greeted a new user and made a remark not to put in a direct commercial link in the document and she was trying to create a nice addition, but it's clear that is very much a newbie, because she asked me how to make a link etc. It's clear that you are a lot more advanced already and just reverted all of her changes. The point is that she is not going to understand of course. So could please try to inform her on her talk page ( User_talk:Antoinettenora ) because she is potentially a good editor and I think that she will be of benefit for the page, but she is not going to notice the edit summary or the talk page of the document and stuff like that. Dr Debug (Talk) 22:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sarvodaya

I meant to add it as a topic related to anarchism, but in light of a better place to put it, added it there. I didn't think it was out of line considering Swadeshi's inclusion in the list, but maybe neither belong. The sarvodaya system is closely related to anarchism though, and its article is pretty miserable. However, I think that the topic is of interest to anarchists because sarvodaya is a village democracy system built around "swadeshi, bread labour, non-possession, trusteeship, non-exploitation, and equality". Its five main principles are "cooperation, serving those in need, satisfying work, participation, and nonviolence". The only thing that really keeps it from being anarchism is that it doesn't necessarily reject the state, but nor does it necessary accept it. If you have any ideas for a better placement, I'd be happy to entertain them. Sarge Baldy 16:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think that's the best thing to do. Sarge Baldy 16:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swadeshi, syndicalism, pacifism (?), anarchism and the arts, anarchist symbolism, neo-luddism, veganism/freeganism. I'm sure once we have a section we can fill it up. It might also make sense to put anarchist economics and anarchist law there, because those aren't really anarchist concepts, they're more articles about various anarchist concepts. Sarge Baldy 20:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Savin's exclusion from the PGA

This is a source on Savin's exclusion.Harrypotter 19:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ward Churchill misconduct allegations summary

I would prefer in the summary blurb that points to the child article, Ward Churchill misconduct allegations, to avoid the direct quote from Churchill. I believe the same quote would be useful in that child article, but there's a problem with leaving it in the summary pointer, to my mind.

I do not know if you've looked at the edit history and talk page of the article(s); but in fact, over the last six months or so, I've been the chief editor trying to maintain the sanity of the coverage against frequent new and single-purpose editors who wish to put in long and vindictive editorial statements about just how very much they dislike Churchill. Not always material that is factually inaccurate, but always a problem of tone and "undue weight".

My belief is that if you try to leave in the Counterpunch direct quote from Churchill in the section summary, that will just invite other editors to find some long and hate-filled comment about Churchill from another source, and insert it next to the Churchill quote. That editor will make a spurious argument that the quote is verifiable, and therefore must be included. The middle ground to walk is to leave the summary strictly in the neutral third-person, rather than let this "war of quotes" grow there. Churchill's statement is fairly emotional in tone, and I believe we're better with a more plainly factual tone in that section (I recognize, of course, that reporting a quote isn't the same as endorsing it's tone; but I still feel that material better belongs in the child article).

If you'd like to do something really, really helpful, you can keep an eye on the Ward Churchill misconduct allegations article, where an anonymous editor has been repeatedly blanking multiple paragraphs, essentially trying to remove any seciton or topic that might seem vaguely favorable to Churchill. It would be really nice to have at least one other editor watching for that, rather than have to do all the reverts of the blanking myself. LotLE×talk 17:24, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask you a favor: go over and revert the blanking that User:70.114.205.215 just did again, over at Ward Churchill misconduct allegations. I think a good argument exists that the change qualifies as vandalism, but I don't want to violate 3RR by restoring the deletions a fourth time. The help would be really.... well, helpful. LotLE×talk 21:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are wrong. The change was valid and appropriate. Also, your comments about my edits are way off the mark. I'm only focusing on the slanderous/libelous comments of Churchill toward other professors who happen to disagree with him. I believe from your comments that you want to work with Lulu to simply find a way to stop my editing. Churchill has been found by a committee at the University of Colorado to have engaged in serious research misconduct and the quotes that I am attempting to remove are focused on his personal attacks on these good professors. You have not attempted to discuss the topic with me directly, but rather you have recruiter Lulu to work with you to shut me down. I have commented on the talk page and neither you or Lulu have attempted to have a discussion with me even though I have asked both of you (anyone) to discuss the topic and I have not had any response. You have already decided that my good faith efforts to edit the document are "vandalism" as you state right here. You are not editing in good faith. Why have you decided that only you and Lulu are allowed to make edits to the article? And why have you decided to leave in Churchill's personal attacks on other professors? That is not the way that Wikipedia is suppose to work. It is supposed to be a colaborative effort but from the actions of you and Lulu it is clear that together you both have decided to just ignore my comments on the Talk Page and just reverse anything that I do and then, instead of debating and discussing the topice with me, you just state that if I don't agree with you then my work in just "vandalism." Please edit in good faith, based upon your discussion with Lulu above it is clear to me that you aren't. --- --70.114.205.215 22:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC) ---[reply]

More on POV-changes to lead

I'm not sure how much you're around WP, or if Ward Churchill misconduct allegations is on your watchlist. But User:Verklempt has lately been trying repeatedly to insert some POV nonsense into the lead. I guess you can see what it is yourself from the edit history, but basically it's: (a) insert misleading phrase "compared victims to Nazis"; (b) invent brand new claim that Churchill "plagiarized" "little Eichmann" phrase from Zerzan; (c) remove the actual characterization of what Churchill's essay is about to substitute a short caricature. Anyway, if you feel like watching... way cool. LotLE×talk 04:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal case

Hello there, N1h1l. I have volunteered to mediate the case regarding Peoples' Global Action. Please voice any opinions and evidence you have supporting your stance at the relevant page. Only with your cooperation can the case be resolved peacefully. Thanks. --physicq210 17:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Anti-authoritarian; Workers Solidarity Alliance; Social Revolutionary Anarchist Federation; The Angry Brigade; Rhizome Collective; Solidarity Federation; Alternative Media Project; Autonomedia; Agitator; Green Anarchy; Institute for Anarchist Studies; Practical Anarchy; White Panther Party; Curious George Brigade; Victor Yarros; Melbourne Anarchist Communist Group; Anarchist Prisoners' Legal Aid Network; Wendy McElroy; Black anarchism

Cleanup: Red & Anarchist Action Network; Steve Booth; Abe Bluestein
Merge: Nationalist anarchism; Property is theft!; Red and Anarchist Action Network
Add Sources: Anarchism and society; List of the most popular names in the 1910s in the United States; Love and Rage Network
Wikify: Praxeology; Giambattista Vico; Jolly Rogers Cookbook
Expand: Anarchism and Marxism; Political compass; List of United States presidential electors, 2000

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:ElishaShapiro.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ElishaShapiro.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin A. Carson

The removed content is redundant on earlier text within the same article. Please do not revert again.--Jsorens 16:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2010 February 3-4: I inserted "In response to these criticisms...," not in response "to Carson" as you wrote (when you were citing your reason for undoing my edit); please don't misread/misquote me. The Chicago economists are addressing Carson's (& others') criticisms re: Latin America & regula'n.

1. Carson (an economics blogger who barely met WP's notability guidelines) is mocking individuals & groups that are Nobel-prize/economics winners, so their responses to Carson's criticism(s) really are more notable (WP:due). WP:due also says that when both sides' positions are available, both are to be given. Otherwise, someone deleting content that supports only one side might appear to be attempting to give a one-sided argument to advance a POV.

2. These economists would be reasonable to consider Carson too insignificant and uncredentialed for them to take time to give him (and every blog that criticizes them) a personal response, but Carson makes criticisms that many others (often of similar ideology to Carson) have made.

3. The "Vulgar Libertarianism" section (which you added, or at least re-added) brings up Carson's criticisms of Chicago, and these economists have addressed such criticisms.

i.e. These economists' commentary are perfectly _relevant_ to this section of the article, in regards to WP policies and in regards to the critiques that K Carson has made, even if they are not addressing Carson personally-- and of course they come from a verifiable, RS source, and meet all other WP stds I can think of (e.g. like Carson's bias, their bias is duly disclosed to the reader (rather than stating a biased source's opinion in an 'encyclopedic voice' as if it were fact).

If you have further objections, please:

A.) before deleting any content, note actual WP policies that justify any deletion (and in accord with WP policies, please move deleted content to the 'talk' page unless it is "obvious vandalism" or similar cases),

B.) or at least suggest ways that you think the content would no longer be misleading, instead of a wholesale deletion.

P.S. Note that I could just delete the whole Vulgar Libertarianism section because it's unsourced material being attributed to a Living Person: The only link in the section (before I edited it) to support the credibility of parts you've added (or re-added) is not only a deadlink, it also appears to have been a newslist or blog (often those aren't WP:V, even when it was an active link); additionally it was located in a position that suggests it only supported the 1st paragraph's content not the 2nd (so even if it wasn't a deadlink & was WP:V, I could delete half the content in the section (IIRC, added by you). e.g. In the 1st sentence, "Carson credits himself with coining the pejorative term...," it is unclear whether Carson himself has called it pejorative, or if that's just your (quite reasonable) interpretation; unlike my additions that you deleted, I can't even fact-check that b/c you have no reliable/verifiable source. 24.155.209.101 (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous, you seem to be unfamiliar with the use of quotation marks. No one is misquoting you and it is clear that your original edit implied a response to Carson. Thanks for correcting it. If you'd like to source the rest of the section, please go right ahead. Its not my article, I'm just one of a dozen editors who have worked on it. - N1h1l (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just Things

A tag has been placed on Just Things, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Just Things. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 00:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

avtomatz reply

search eco-radicals on google or somethin u'll c stuff bout them there

I predict the following. RE: the terroist portal

A known sockpuppet supporting Verklempt's position may show up in a day or 2. It happened to me on the Ward Churchill misconduct issues page just a few days ago. I think we can gain enough support to have that portal deleted and stay deleted without an edit war. Albion moonlight 03:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AAW.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AAW.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DivaNTrainin

Hey, have you reported this user for the constant refactoring of the Copwatch talk page? Do you think it's necessary? Murderbike 20:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if you nominate DivaNTraining for another ban and I will gladly support it. This woman is super annoying. I left a comment on her talk page asking nicely to follow Wiki rules... she logged on 6 hours later, blanked the comment, and then resubmitted the same unsourced edit to Copwatch for about the 30th time.Factchecker atyourservice 15:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Mycota 04:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lucifer849.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucifer849.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Up Against the Wall Motherfuckers fact tag

The source is provided as "January 1969 Get Back Sessions at Twickenham Studios in London." Now, I have no idea whether the quote is accurate, but in any case it's a citation, so that the fact tag is the wrong one. There's another tag, for citations whose accuracy is doubted, but I forget what it is. Personally, I don't care whether this tag is there or not, but it doesn't make sense for it to be. —Jemmy_tc 22:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I looked it up and the correct tag is {{verify source}}. - N1h1l (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WIR-bank.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WIR-bank.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zencart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zencart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Btmural067indybay2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Btmural067indybay2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ElishaShapiro.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ElishaShapiro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MP 2 tapa grande.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:MP 2 tapa grande.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:ElishaShapiro.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ElishaShapiro.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. скоморохъ 18:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Snog-adventuresincapitalism.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Snog-adventuresincapitalism.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Individual reclamation

Yo, nice work on the article; I'm just wondering where you got the title from? I had never come across it in English before, and none of the first (10 of 733) Google hits except the Wikipedia article seem to use the term in this sense. I'm wondering if we should move the article to reprise individuelle? скоморохъ 02:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at Talk:Individual reclamation.

Speedy deletion of Image:Lucifer849.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Lucifer849.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Lucifer849.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BJ^Talk 12:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Yo, great work writing the Keith Preston article; we've being missing that for a long time. Solidarity, Skomorokh 03:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kevin Carson

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kevin Carson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Carson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Coal scrip.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Coal scrip.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. εω (talk) 22:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Snog-adventuresincapitalism.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snog-adventuresincapitalism.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

expropiative anarchism

i think that the main reason for the unavailability of information on expropriative anarchism in english is the fact that it was based in Spain and Argentina. if you know spanish you could very well visit the webpage archive of expropriative anarchism. It is clear that Buenaventura Durruti was an important anarchist in spain to be too much of an illegalist a la bande a bonnot.--Eduen (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cybernetic Culture Research Unit

Hello N1h1l, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Cybernetic Culture Research Unit, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Jstriker. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Jstriker. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Jstriker (talk · contribs) 01:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Infoshop (disambiguation)

The article Infoshop (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this page does not meet WP:DAB. all entries in this page do not have Wikipedia articles, and the entries are linked to external sites (see WP:D3)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amsaim (talk) 12:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Btmural067indybay2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Btmural067indybay2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:VoluntarySocialism.png

Thank you for uploading File:VoluntarySocialism.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keith Preston

The article Keith Preston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, poorly sourced promotional BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MBisanz ^talk 06:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Demisexuality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Demisexuality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demisexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WIR-bank.png

A tag has been placed on File:WIR-bank.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. FeralOink (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VirtueMart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VirtueMart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VirtueMart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bulwersator (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coal scrip or Company scrip, can we work together?

Hey there, I have submitted an article on coal scrip and of course came across the article called Company Scrip. I saw that you have a image from the Olga coal co, very nice by the way. Anyway, I wanted to know if some expansion could be done on this article so that folsk will know what coal scrip or company scrip actually is as opposed to the pseudo post structural socialist dogma that is there now. I am cool with that, but as I actually have relatives and ancestors that used scrip and died in coal mines, I thought, wjhy not start from a bare bones perspective and actually tell them, what the item is and then, YES, by all means, how it was used. Looking forward to hearing a replyCoal town guy (talk) 13:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fishbook.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbook.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fishbook.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbook.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:WIR-bank.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:WIR-bank.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SCUM Manifesto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea Hotel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clamor (ministry)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clamor (ministry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Horselover Frost (talk · edits) 11:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Leda Rafanelli

added links pointing to Italian, Interventionists, Avanti and Red Week

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Queers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darren Wilson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Euthanasia AfD, Chris Korda merge proposed

Hi, it seems appropriate to notify you of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Euthanasia. The CoE's notability was challenged, but then substantiated via significant coverage in reliable third party sources. However a merge is also being discussed: it's alleged that Chris Korda isn't sufficiently notable independent of the CoE, despite Korda's musical career, co-founding of Unabomber for President, software development etc. Victimofleisure (talk) 03:31, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Demisexuality

Hello, N1h1l. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Demisexuality".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elisha Shapiro

The article Elisha Shapiro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anonym.OS.

Un p’tit minou pour vous !

JrEvans (talk) 02:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fourth Corner Exchange

The article Fourth Corner Exchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Coverage is sparse and not-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tooncool64 (talk) 07:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]