User talk:Mythdon/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mythdon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Templates
Please stay away from templates for a while. An infobox for franchises is really unnecessary and esoteric, and a template just for your user talk page is highly unnecessary. Please work on writing articles and not making them prettier or easier to navigate with templates.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Is User:Mythdon/talk pages break any policies or guidelines?. Mythdon (talk) 07:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, because it is in your user space as a subpage. Subpages can be made with a slash anywhere but the article space where slashes can be part of titles. Going to /Sandbox will let you work on your own code and whatnot. My suggestion is because there is no need to make infoboxes just for the sake of having infoboxes. There are uses for them, and there are also times when one is not needed whatsoever.
- Also, there is no way that the archive box will be kept at the bottom of the page due to how the editting software works. That is why most users simply have links or sideboxes instead of navboxes.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with the reason you changed the navbox i made from a template to a subpage as the navbox i made uses the exact purpose of a subpage and not in any way a template whatsoever. Mythdon (talk) 22:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Several months prior
I honestly don't remember, since this was two years ago. I just recall that I was editing with only my IP for some time (a few months at least, possibly more) before I finally registered this account. Arrowned (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Could that be fall of 2005 to March of 2006?. Mythdon (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think it was that long. Maybe two or three months at the most. But again, I don't recall exactly. Arrowned (talk) 06:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Why not search your IP (if you remember) at the Special:Contributions page. Mythdon (talk) 05:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think it was that long. Maybe two or three months at the most. But again, I don't recall exactly. Arrowned (talk) 06:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Infobox Move
I think you should just move the thing and change all the pages to reflect the new template name. You know, WP:BE BOLD and all. Serves me well, at least. If the usual template format would have an infobox for a character have "character" in the name, then move it, since you're obviously correct in your thinking on this matter. Just be exceedingly thorough, and make sure you change every last page. Howa0082 (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of User:Mythdon/user info
An editor has nominated User:Mythdon/user info, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Mythdon/user info
User:Mythdon/user info, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mythdon/user info during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info
You listed this in the wrong venue -- userspace should be taken to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion instead. I've transferred the listing for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Centralized TV Episode Discussion
Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 16:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
merge discussion
that means there is not decision to delete, and if ppl want to merge, they should hold a separate discussion on the talk pages, as appropriate. -- Y not be working? 19:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Name
It's pronounced My-Zoo, I think you spelled it My-Zu in that pronounciation, if I might ask, why do you ask? XD Myzou (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes
I have nominated List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TrUCo9311 17:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Episode number
I'm tired of doing this in that short little line.
We do not need to continually update an episode number in that infobox. That section is either for series that are over or series that are known to have a set amount of episodes. It is easier to just say "This series is ongoing" rather than working on updating that one number every episode airing. It also gets confusing when there are more episodes in a section rather than in that little number. Right now, we have five episode titles, but we're only saying that there are three episodes? That is why it is easier to say "Ongoing" rather than a definite number.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Are you crazy? There has to be some part in the article that specifically makes it clear about the current number of aired episodes. Mythdon (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where does it say that, if I may ask?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean?. Mythdon (talk) 06:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where does it say that, if I may ask?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{prod}}
template to the article Sally Campbell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}}
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)